Earthlink Announces It Must Honor Comcast Cap
LostCluster writes "For those in Comcast territory, a popular way to get around Comcast's 250 GB monthly cap was to sign up for EarthLink Powered by Comcast Service, where there was no cap. Forget about that.... Earthlink just posted an FAQ explaining that Comcast will enforce the cap against Earthlink customers starting July 1."
According to TFA, they won't notify if you approach the limit, and the only way to find out your current usage is to call them. Now that's handy.
I just checked my Comcast usage. I practically live on the internet. Here's my usage:
15 GB so far this month.
17 GB for April
22 GB for March
15 GB for February
On the list of things I'm going to spend the effort to care about, people who have trouble with a 250 GB cap is far enough down the list I'm afraid I'll never get around to it.
Then you had jackshit for bandwidth. My math might be off, but 250GB 24/7 per month is like a constant 100 kb/s.
"Which was purchased by Comcast after they went bankrupt."
-1, Inaccurate
No, Charter Communications was not bought by Comcast
my karma will be here long after I'm gone
...a massively high data cap, such as a quarter of a terabyte per month?
That depends on who is doing the defining of "massively high" and for how long into the future we're talking, doesn't it?
As many have already mentioned in other posts, 250GB/mo isn't that much these days even without p2p, and I sure don't see that trend reversing or even slowing. I wonder how "cloud computing" and bandwidth caps will work out?
Strat
Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
"good enough for England"
I said UK. England is just one of four countries in the UK, and it's not the one that I live in.
UK != England as USA != California :-)
Not always. My O2 connection is unlimited, for example. It's usually the BT resellers that have the low limits.
Even so, I probably average about 25 GB/month. I don't know what people are doing to go over 250.