Slashdot Mirror


Venture Capitalists Lobby Against Software Patents

ciaran_o_riordan writes "No matter which side the US Supreme Court's Bilski decision pleases, it will be just the beginning of the software patent debate in the USA — the other side will start a legislative battle. The lobbying has already begun, with venture capitalist Brad Feld arguing against software patents, mailing a copy of Patent Absurdity to 200 patent policy setters. As Feld puts it, 'Specifically, I'm hoping the film will bring you to an understanding of why patents on software are a massive tax on and retardant of innovation in the US.' The patent lawyers and big patent holders often tell us that patents are needed to secure investment, so it's interesting to see now that venture capitalists are refuting that. And Brad Feld isn't the only vocal one; there's a growing list."

5 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory link by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Against intellectual monopoly" by Boldrin and Levine:
    http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm

    This book nicely sums up the arguments against patents :-)

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  2. Re:American regulation. by burnin1965 · · Score: 5, Informative

    America just doesn't understand how to do proper regulation. Every attempt at regulation ends up causing more problems than it manages to fix, or the lack of regulation ends up allowing horrid behavior to occur.

    Every now and again the United States does get it right.

    Before the United States government forced aircraft manufacturers and patent holders into the Manufacturers Aircraft Association there was a patent war that resulted in lots of litigation in the United States but no aircraft manufacturing or innovation once the patent war started.

    When a real war broke out, WW1, the United States had to buy aircraft from France because the United States business ventures were more interested in lawsuits than making aircraft.

    After ending the patent war by forcing everyone into a patent pool the aircraft industry in the United States took off.

    There are other similar cases that plainly show how the patent system has been a failure from the beginning in serving the Constitutional requirements. To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.

  3. Re:Absurdly obvious by burnin1965 · · Score: 4, Informative

    they usually create innovations independently then pay protection money to the trolls

    Actually it works both ways.

    While their primary function is not as a patent troll Apple, Microsoft and Amazon have in turn played the role of the frivilous patent litigant with the biggest difference being in their objective of halting the "Progress of Science and useful Arts" to the betterment of their bottom line.

  4. Re:American regulation. by burnin1965 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980
    Say hello to risky and out of control lending

    Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act, 1982
    Enjoy the savings and loan crisis

    Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 would do away with restrictions on the integration of banking, insurance and stock trading imposed by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933
    Welcome the age of "too big to fail"

  5. Re:Absurdly obvious by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The start-up is first to market (by definition)"

    That's just wrong. A start-up is simply a new company.