Slashdot Mirror


Turkey Has Reportedly Banned Google

oxide7 and a number of other readers sent word (from mostly non-authoritative sources as yet) that Turkey had imposed an indefinite ban on some Google properties. "Turkey's Telecommunications Presidency said it has banned access to many of Google IP addresses without assigning clear reasons. The statement did not confirm if the ban is temporary or permanent. Google's translation and document sharing sites have also been banned indefinitely along with YouTube and Facebook in the country. Other services such as AppEngine, FeedBurner, Analytics, etc., have also been reportedly banned." Some real-time commentary (much of it in Turkish) can be found at Twitter hashtag #TurkeyCensoringGoogle. We have noted in past years the censorious ways of Turkish courts.

12 of 531 comments (clear)

  1. Flow of Information by headkase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this quote applies here:

    As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.

    Commissioner Pravin Lal
    "U.N. Declaration of Rights"

    source

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Flow of Information by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Au contraire. The quote, or rather it's use, is all the more impressive (though not in a good way) for what it represents, the death of conventional literacy.

    2. Re:Flow of Information by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yet, Turkey is/was a charter nation in the creation of the United Nations; they've also been a member in NATO since the Cold War.

      Somehow, something has changed. It's interesting that this so closely coincides with the "blockade" incident with Israel, on account of many of the participants having been Turkish citizens.

      I wonder if either of these events have anything to do with the recent (2002) elections in Turkey, where the AKP party (a 'religiously conservative' party with strong Islamic 'influence') won the seats of government in overwhelming numbers. It would certainly explain socio-political events since that time, if indeed they're moving closer towards the Islamic "center" (as Iran claims having done themselves).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Flow of Information by Bartab · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet, Turkey is/was a charter nation in the creation of the United Nations; they've also been a member in NATO since the Cold War.

      The UN is populated more by dictatorships than anything approaching "free countries", and NATO broke down into a "sign this paper against communism and the US will give you money" almost instantly.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    4. Re:Flow of Information by Bartab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is indeed to do with the AKP party - but that is nothing new for turkey - what is new that this time the army has not responded with a coup as it normally does when religious folk get out of control in turkey. I think it has happened at least 3 or 4 times so far.

      This is true, and entirely the fault of the EU. The -people- of Turkey want a religious, sharia law based, dictatorship. It's a foreign thought to western minds, but as you point out they've pressured for such a gov't several times. At which point the, highly secular, military comes out in a minor coup and re-establishes what was the second freest nation in the area.

      The EU didn't like that, so as such a gov't is being implemented now the military is holding back and not correcting the situation, and we get headlines like this one.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    5. Re:Flow of Information by gordoste · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apparently "democracy" in America means the tyranny of the rich minority runs unchecked. In the absence of something to provide a moral compass, money has filled the vacuum and now anything is OK as long as it makes money.

    6. Re:Flow of Information by tsm_sf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The quote, or rather it's use, is all the more impressive (though not in a good way) for what it represents, the death of conventional literacy.

      Where do you get off talking about "conventional" literacy? The form has been living and evolving for more than five thousand years, and certainly wasn't destined to peak "when you were younger". The quote you're bitching about contains a specific point of view that was communicated effectively enough that at least one reader(whatever) was able to apply it in a manner that conveyed his thinking on a similar but unrelated topic.

      How many authors have failed to hit that mark?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    7. Re:Flow of Information by macshit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The -people- of Turkey want a religious, sharia law based, dictatorship. It's a foreign thought to western minds, but as you point out they've pressured for such a gov't several times. At which point the, highly secular, military comes out in a minor coup and re-establishes what was the second freest nation in the area.

      No, some people in Turkey want a religious government, some would like sharia law, and a few would like a dictatorship. The number of people that actually want all those things together is probably rather small.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    8. Re:Flow of Information by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because a country under Sharia law is never in practice a democracy. Also there is no such thing as a liberal reading of Sharia law, the people who are liberals dont want sharia law, and the people who do want it, certainly are not going to water it down. So the only possible liberal reading of sharia law is one where its not read at all.

      As an aside, to all the people who bring the US into unrelated conversations - take a look at its history - the US is by a wide margin the historically the best (in terms of how they treat others) superpower of all time. They make mistakes a-plenty (some on purpose too) - but bringing them into comparisons of islamists or the like as if you would not care if a country like Iran replaced the US as the main superpower in the world is just plain and simple stupid. Please take a step back and consider what you are saying.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    9. Re:Flow of Information by chrb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The -people- of Turkey want a religious, sharia law based, dictatorship.

      I take it you have never met any of the Turkish people, or ever travelling to Turkey? I have, and found that most people do not want anything to do with the kind of ultra-conservative views you attribute to them.

      Basically, your position is the same as saying "The -people- of the United States want a religious, Ten Commandments law based, dictatorship", based on the government of George Bush being overtly Fundamentalist Christian, and being elected by the people of the U.S.

      In fact, what the people of Turkey mostly want is good government and an end to corruption, security and prosperity, and for much of the youth, to be E.U. citizens so that they can freely study and travel in the rest of Europe. The election of AKP was more to do with rejecting the policies of the previous administration than endorsing Islamism.

  2. Re:Seriously by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NATO doesn't care about dictators, look at how many right-wing military coups we've supported. Heck, look at how most of NATO supported just about everyone who was anti-Soviet. They don't care about human rights, just as long as they aren't communist or allied with Russia.

    All NATO stands for is opposing Russia and its allies, if you think it stands for human rights or anything you should look at the conflicts in the cold war and which side the US supported.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  3. Re:Or, put another way... by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I dunno, but it seems to me that dogmatic, xenophobic, recidivist behaviour is on the rise
    > worldwide -- Islam certainly has no corner on the market for running amok, not now, and not
    > historically, and the term "Christian" probably carries as much negative baggage through
    > the years as "Muslim" does.

    This quote is a good example of an all too common species of politically correct fool. So much wrong with it. It assumes time is immaterial. That events in the dark past are indisinguishable from current events and carry the exact same moral weight. That persons, events and movements must be judged with the exact same modern politically correct intolerant eye.

    We are still crawling up from the muck, people and events must be viewed from the perspective of the time they occured in. For example the US Founders lived in a time when slavery was accepted as normal and had been since recorded history began. Individual liberty of any sort was a REVOLUTIONARY idea. After exhausting peaceful means they became violent revolutionaries. And most of them understood the inherent conflict between slavery and "All Men are created equal..." but also realized the new nation wasn't ready to follow where that line of thought lead. But notice that less than a century later the only places still practicing slavery were parts of Africa and the Middle East outside the range of the British Navy. Christianity did some nasty things but went through the Enlightenment, pretending that didn't happen and judging it as if that didn't happen and that the religion of the Inquisition still exists unchanged is daft.

    Islam didn't experience the Enlightenment and rejects it today. The past is just that, past; we have a problem in the here and now as a result. Islam's rejection of the foundational principles of modern civilization is a problem NOW. Coexistance isn't even possible because of their expansionist and supremisist ideas. We in the West either abandon our civilization and accept Sharia or sooner or later (and with Nukes spreading it better be sooner) we are going to be forced to end Islam as it is currently known and practiced. That means Ann Coulter's solution of "Invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." It will be the worst human rights atrocity in recorded history but I'm damned if I see a better solution. We just don't have the time left to embark on a psyops action to slowly pervert their religion so as to remove the nastier bits.

    So if it comes down to them or me I'm picking me and mine. Politically incorrect selfish bastard that I am. Future generations can flagelate themselves like the modern campus set do now about the American Indians, the Monroe Doctrine, ending WWII with the Bomb, the Cold War or any of that other stuff. So long as it IS civilization having that discussion in the future and not some starving primitives worshiping an insane child molester in a radioactive wasteland. And they will be sort of 'right' in that by the more advanced civilization our hard choices will allow them to build what we will do in our day will BE wrong... but still making the same mistake modern scholars keep making of judging us by their standards. So be it.

    --
    Democrat delenda est