Slashdot Mirror


Safari 5 Released

pknoll writes "Apple has released the fifth version of the Safari web browser, which adds several new features. Reader mode detects multiple-page articles and displays them in their entirety at the click of a button, and most importantly, there is now an official extension API."

16 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It's fully functional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Opera is the best porn browser.

  2. Re:Same as Readable App by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The content extraction feature sounds a lot like the Readable Bookmarlet that I've been running across browsers for the last year.

    With the addition of being able to extract data from a multi-page article.

  3. Re:For your safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    pretty much every device supports AAC you retard.

  4. Re:Refuse to test it by SassyDave · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chrome does have adblocking now. Does it not work for you?

  5. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any sufficiently advanced program is indistinguishable from Emacs.

  6. Re:Haha by LaminatorX · · Score: 2, Informative

    ctl+meta+shift+/+.

  7. Re:Apple, take your proprietary browser and stuffi by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a joke, right? HTML5 is a W3C standard, and WebKit is an open-source rendering engine with Apple contributing the most development. Get a clue.

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
  8. Re:Refuse to test it by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Chrome does have adblocking now. Does it not work for you?

    Another poster explained that Chrome's ad-blocking still downloads the ad, but doesn't display it. This is a problem for anybody on a metered or low-bandwidth connection (e.g. tethering through a cell phone, as I'm doing now) who don't want to download the ads, regardless of whether or not they get displayed. Of course, most people have broadband connections and don't care what gets downloaded in the background, as long as they don't have to see it.

    In theory, web sites could try to detect whether an ad was downloaded or not, and refuse to display content unless you've also downloaded the ads. In practice, this isn't normally done, but if it were, with Chrome the web site would still work.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  9. Re:Still no volume control by TheCycoONE · · Score: 4, Informative

    Per-application volume control is typically a sound system option; supported through Vista, Windows 7, Pulse Audio, OSS, and I assume OSX. Putting a volume control in the application itself would be redundant at this point.

  10. Re:"The worlds fastest browser" by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    The difference is that while the webkit boys are making their javascript engine faster.. the opera boys are also making the browser faster.

    webkit has a slight edge on javascript speed, I guess.. some benchmarks say so anyways..

    ..but opera (and chrome) are so much snappier than safari, at least on windows, and its not even a contest. We don't need benchmarks to see how poorly safari is running on windows compared to opera and chrome... the difference is visually apparent.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  11. Re:Still no volume control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Per-application volume control is typically a sound system option; supported through Vista, Windows 7, Pulse Audio, OSS, and I assume OSX.

    Wow, you're wrong on so many levels. You presume OS X has per app volume controls outside of apps, but didn't bother to check? Guess what, it does not. Each app is responsible for it's own sound controls and Safari has none. And even if it did have a control in the OS configurations, that's not very useful. Would you make the same argument that Songbird should not have a volume control, because you can just go turn it off in the OS config? That's more than a bit inconvenient don't you think?

  12. Re:OK, so extensions... by vlueboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you don't like the adverts on a site, don't go to the site. Just spare the couple of KB, and get the site you admittedly appreciate some revenue to offset the bandwidth costs they incur to give you the information you want.

    Sadly, this was OK 10 years ago. These days, websites have 1-3 flash ads with unoptimized animations. The result is that my laptop heats up and performance degrades considerably even when I'm not watching the ad.

    All my local OS's block a few like ads.doubleclick.net, clk.atdmt.com, qksrv.net and ads.x10.com.

  13. Re:If you're not on OSX by soppsa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Safari 2 maybe. Safari has not had 'funky rendering problems' in a *long* time. Where do you think Chrome's rendering engine comes from?

  14. Re:OK, so extensions... by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well plugins like ClickToFlash still work.

    Extension details can be seen here:
    http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/Tools/Conceptual/SafariExtensionGuide/Introduction/Introduction.html

    An awesome demonstration of what they're capable of:
    http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/06/coda-notes-previe/

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  15. Safari 5 fixes 48 security holes! by 200_success · · Score: 2, Informative

    Users should also be aware that Safari 5 fixes 48 security holes in Safari 4.0. Therefore, if you are using Safari 4.0, you should upgrade as soon as possible. For Mac OS 10.4, there is Safari 4.1 available instead of Safari 5.0.

  16. Re:Still no volume control by prockcore · · Score: 2, Informative

    OSX doesn't.. but Linux and Windows both have per-application volume management... and using chrome, that becomes per-tab volume management.