Slashdot Mirror


Studies Prove BPA Can Cross Placenta To Fetuses

Totes McGotes writes "From canned food to plastic bottles, Bisphenol-A seems to be cropping up everywhere, and now two new studies show that BPA freely crosses the placenta from pregnant mother to fetus. Plus, the research found that chemical transformations occur in the fetus allowing inactive BPA to be converted to the active form."

5 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Great description by camperdave · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bisphenol A is a component in polycarbonate plastics, used to make stuff like baby and water bottles, sports equipment, medical and dental devices, dental fillings and sealants, eyeglass lenses, CDs and DVDs, and household electronics. It is also used in thermal and carbonless paper, and as a protective coating on the inside of tin cans. BPA has been linked to obesity and many cancers, and worst of all (dumm, dumm, DAHHHH) adult male sexual dysfunction.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  2. Sort of by Benfea · · Score: 4, Informative

    It acts like female hormones once it gets inside the human body. Not good for adults, but really bad for babies.

  3. Re:Enough with the "Proof" by thePig · · Score: 4, Informative

    There has been quite a bit of scientific literature regarding BPA - see the links from Wikipedia.

    --
    rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  4. Re:Aaaand... by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, they're all bad.

    Say what now? Nylon? Polyethylene? Nothing bad about them at all.

    As a rule, it's usually the additives and trace chemicals from production that cause problems. All plastics are large chain molecules (and thus not absorbed by the body) and most are quite stable and do not break into monamers that could very easily (which is why most plastics are not biodegradable, and the very reason they are used).

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  5. Does it though? by snowwrestler · · Score: 4, Informative

    BPA as a chemical was discovered in the 19th century and it was investigated as a synthetic estrogen in the 1930s. However, it was never pursued as a production estrogen replacement (unlike DES). The question is, why not? Try to find an answer online--it's very difficult.

    My understanding is that while it appeared to act like estrogen in the test tube, it turned out to have very little measurable estrogen-like effect in humans. My understanding is based on reading I did on BPA several years ago, but I have misplaced the citations. If anyone has a link to a detailed history of the pharma research involving BPA in the early 20th century, I'd be interested to read it. The Wikipedia article, for instance, is pretty much silent on anything involving BPA before a few years ago.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.