2 In 3 Misunderstand Gas Mileage; Here's Why
thecarchik sends in this piece, which was published last March but remains timely: "OK, so here's a little test: Which saves more gasoline, going from 10 to 20 mpg, or going from 33 to 50 mpg? If you're like most Americans, you picked the second one. But, in fact, that's exactly backwards. Over any given mileage, replacing a 10-mpg vehicle with one that gets 20 mpg saves five times the gasoline that replacing a 33-mpg vehicle with one that gets 50 does. Last summer, Duke University's Fuqua School of Business released a study that shows how much damage comes from using MPG instead of consumption to measure how green a car is. Management professors Richard Larick and Jack Soll's experiments proved that consumers thought fuel consumption was cut at an even rate as mileage increased."
News at 11!
True, but you're one of those people who want to use the metric system and hate America, so I won't listen to what you say.
No. Here is why. I consider it a stupid tax. Like the lottery. We need more stupid taxes. Down with the stupid.
Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
It's not like that? It's exactly like that. Your car has made you into an idiot.
"Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
Clearly, what we need here is a car analogy!
Anyone?
Cheers,
"What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
"A four-foot prune."
My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it.