Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft a Weak Link In Possible Cyber War

climenole writes 'Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods,' says former White House advisor Richard Clarke in a recent book. Microsoft makes the list of risks because so many people have installed its software for critical systems.

4 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. Clark is all right by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember, he was the guy who warned Rice and President Cheney about an imminent Al Qaeda attack. Or depending how you view it, failed to convince them of it. Still, as ass covering goes, his was iron clad.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  2. Re:He said what? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Clarke is not on the "White House team". He retired a few years ago. Come on, people, would it hurt you to at least read the summary?

  3. Re:Summary misdirected by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    While true, by the time MS became an expensive option it no longer mattered - millions of people were already locked in.

    Back in the days, MS (and the cheap hardware they ran on) were a cheap option compared to Novell, Sun, DEC, SGI, IBM, Apple and all the other highend vendors... MS and x86 were massively inferior to everything else on the market, but with such a huge price differential they were able to make it up on volume...

    Ford cars are clearly inferior to Rolls Royce or Ferrari, however you see a lot more Fords on the roads for the same reason. However, cars are standardised enough that its impossible to lock someone in, thus ensuring there is a healthy level of competition in the industry.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  4. Re:Windows, vs. LINUX, vs. MacOS X (security vulns by erroneus · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a frequently used troll post. It has been completely debunked in the past several times. All of the critical bugs listed for the Linux kernel, for example, were local exploits only -- NONE were remote. In contrast, Microsoft's exploitable bugs are famously remote exploits meaning they can be done over a network connection. Mac OS X is another bag of worms... but thankfully, Apple controls and limits its users such that it will never be big or ubiquitous enough for large scale general use like Windows and will never likely get used in critical government or business operations.