Slashdot Mirror


Google Introduces, Then Scraps, Bing-Style Background Images

NIN1385 writes "Google has scrapped the now infamous background image option on its homepage. After 14 hours of a scheduled 24-hour experiment to see how people liked (or disliked) the new homepage layout, the company must have found out it was very disliked. I guess the fact that 'remove Google background' was the seventh most searched for phrase today might have had something to do with it."

11 of 466 comments (clear)

  1. Microsoft Responds by eihab · · Score: 4, Funny

    There were also a couple of snarky tweets from Microsoft regarding the "bing-style" backgrounds.

    --
    If you can't mod them join them.
  2. Didn't even notice by by+(1706743) · · Score: 5, Funny

    I only use the Pac-Man page.

    1. Re:Didn't even notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh thanks. What was once ONE day of lost productivity has now become an ETERNITY.

  3. slow on uptake by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought this was just a one-day thing they were doing to show they're aware of the oilpocalypse. Bing has pretty pictures but I don't actually use it for anything. As Stephen Colbert said "Bing is the best search engine. I know because I googled it."

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  4. Re:Thanks god. by DriedClexler · · Score: 3, Funny

    What text fading? I don't see any text fading. You must have done something wrong. Especially if you wouldn't even know how to modify that feature. [/typical enthusiast forum response]

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  5. Re:Fire that marketroid! by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google has said in the past that they use an empirical, incremental approach to UI design where user actions are studied and these guide decisions

    I have google set as my home page, and the first thing I did when I got to work was search for what is this shite, Bing?! So, google reverting to a lightweight UI -- that was my idea!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  6. Re:Opera users didnt have a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Quick playin' Battlefield: Bad Company 2, finish Fallout 3 dammit.

    5 of 50 achievements! Yeesh!

  7. Re:How clever of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If life gives you marmals, make marmalade.

    The repercussions of being given mammals is terrifying.

  8. Clever on Google's Part by dmomo · · Score: 1, Funny

    1) Emulate absurd feature of competitor
    2) Wait for public upheaval
    3) Concede to users' outrage
    4) Make it into a news story
    5) ...
    6) Profit!

    What many people may have gotten from this:
    "Wow, Bing still does that? Google was good enough to axe it. Google cares about users. Bing is Tacky"

  9. Re:Resistance to change by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

    > I recall reading that they would like to remove the "I'm feeling lucky"
    > button (because no one uses it), but they can't. Users simply can't
    > handle large changes.

    Well that's an easy one to handle. Just remove it gradually. Every week, take off 1 letter.

    I'm Feeling Lucky
    I'm Feeling Luck
    I'm Feeling Luc
    I'm Feeling Lu
    I'm Feeling L
    etc.

    In just a few short months the button will be worn down to a nub and can then be safely removed without causing stress for users.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  10. Re:Opera users didnt have a problem by shiftless · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do I even want to know what the background in question looked like? I bet I don't. In fact, here's me explicitly *not* even asking. Whatever it was, I'm glad I missed it.

    It was some hot ass chick bent over a bike getting it from the biker. It's a good thing you missed it, it was pretty sinful.