Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Replaces F-Spot With Shotwell

climenole writes "Finally! The much discussed F-Spot vs. Shotwell battle is over. The new default image organizer app for Ubuntu Maverick 10.10 is going to be Shotwell. This is a much-needed change; F-Spot was simply not enough. Most of the times when I tried F-Spot, it just keeps crashing on me. Shotwell on the other hand feels a lot more solid and is better integrated with the GNOME desktop. Shotwell is also completely devoid of Mono."

16 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. If someone integrates F-spot into gnome..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't it then be named G-spot? If a program of such a name were to exist, would any male users be able to find it, let alone use it?

    1. Re:If someone integrates F-spot into gnome..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shot well... a well that you shoot into... I don't think any males in the FOSS community will be able to open the program, much less add files to it.

    2. Re:If someone integrates F-spot into gnome..... by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it's got Mono, I'm not touching it. No wonder it's slow and tired.

  2. Re:On the other hand... by lexDysic · · Score: 5, Funny

    For fuck sake, editors.

    EDIT!

    You must be new he... wait, your UID is 5551? And you're complaining about this now?

    Sir, I am in awe of your patience. Carry on.

    --
    Think! It ain't illegal yet!
    George Clinton
  3. Re:On the other hand... by Improv · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pah. People with four or less numbers in their UID are just a myth.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  4. Re:Stupid remarks by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm using Kubuntu btw, so I couldn't care less about F-Spot.

    Well, thanks for taking the time to post a comment in an article about a product you "couldn't care less about". That's very generous of you, and I'm sure we're all better for reading your insightful words.

  5. Re:On the other hand... by ultrapenguin · · Score: 5, Funny

    really?

  6. Re:Stupid remarks by hedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, that was intentional. He tried it several months ago and it's still crashing.

  7. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, "/usr/bin/vi"

  8. Re:On the other hand... by GraZZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to your mom I'm more of a legend...

  9. Re:On the other hand... by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, I guess that works until you can install Emacs, but I'd hardly call it a real editor....

  10. Re:who cares if it uses mon or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is anyone _really_ wondering... about either?

  11. Re:Great, now get rid of XSANE by JohnBailey · · Score: 2, Funny

    XSANE should never be made available. The GUI is a complete mess, looking like something that belongs on the Amiga. Also, it has yet to work with a single scanner or webcam I throw at it.

    I think I see your problem.. Stop throwing stuff. Peripherals tend to last longer without sudden impact.

    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  12. Re:On the other hand... by whoop · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've heard of these 4-digiters, but never seen one myself...

  13. Re:On the other hand... by grrussel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes.

  14. Re:On the other hand... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Re:On the other hand... (Score:5, Funny)
    by whoop (194) writes: Alter Relationship on Mon Jun 14, '10 05:48 AM (#32562604) Homepage

    I've heard of these 4-digiters, but never seen one myself...

    Ah, the irony of Slashdot UID's - it's the only dick measuring contest where the winner is the smallest one...

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson