Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Replaces F-Spot With Shotwell

climenole writes "Finally! The much discussed F-Spot vs. Shotwell battle is over. The new default image organizer app for Ubuntu Maverick 10.10 is going to be Shotwell. This is a much-needed change; F-Spot was simply not enough. Most of the times when I tried F-Spot, it just keeps crashing on me. Shotwell on the other hand feels a lot more solid and is better integrated with the GNOME desktop. Shotwell is also completely devoid of Mono."

3 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. Re:who cares if it uses mon or not by retchdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    just had the same experience. png support will be added in 0.6. it's kind of ridiculous, but whatever, it's in 0.x. also going to fullscreen and then back appears to totally fuck the interface (ubuntu lucid).

    also: no way (?) to zoom into images.

    I don't know if I like the event paradigm. They should combine it with a date-based view like f-spot. My pictures are a combination of daily snapshots and events. Also I'd like a "random crap from the internet" dumppile which is totally separate from my life... Kind of like keeping Playboys away from the family photo album. :-/

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  2. Re:Isn't it all about options? by ratboy666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are a few developers who I feel indebted to. Icaza is one. I use Midnight Commander every day. I give these developers "the benefit of the doubt". Icaza is up there with Bram Moolenaar (VIM). VIM is more important, but MC also "gets it done". And has for almost 15 years.

    So, when Icaza said "Mono is important", I tried to suspend my disbelief. And, it was difficult for me; the JVM also had a 15 year history for me.

    I'm STILL trying to see it. I "dutifully" installed Moonlight into Firefox. I've tried F-Spot. But, there appears to be no broad-base support for the CLR, even now. No CLR support for Unix... To quote a Microsoft MVP

    "Shinma,

    I would not recommend trying to run .NET on a unix platform. While
    there are attempts (there is a CLR based on a source project released by MS
    named ROTOR, and there is also the MONO project), not all of the
    functionality is there.

    What are you trying to do? Which parts of the framework do you want to
    leverage? I think that there might be an ASP.NET implementation up and
    running.

    --
    - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]"

    Now, MONO claims to have Solaris support, but I haven't yet tried it (can you get support for this from Novell?) And what about AIX and HP-UX?

    JAVA supports these platforms, and so appears to be a more universal delivery system.

    Was Icaza wrong? Maybe. It is possible that the CLR offers features that are not possible with the JVM (I don't know, the only thing I have personally done in this space is a COBOL to JVM system, and I haven't ever really looked at CLR -- after all Alchemy offers a commercial COBOL to CLR compiler already).

    Now, I have never stressed F-Spot, but what I did try appeared to work just fine. I'm all for competition, and if the CLR is superior to the JVM, let it win! I just don't understand why it hasn't been pushed into the Unix space. Are IBM, HP and Oracle wrong?

    Just curious on the thoughts of some fellow developers here. Especially from those companies. Some insight would be valuable.

    Thanks, Ratboy666

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  3. gthumb by roalt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been following developments of gthumb lately and I've seem a significant increase in improvements the last year. I'm pretty sure it's triggered by competition with F-Spot and possibly Shotwell. The main reason for me to use gthumb is the superior import facility for your digital photos. You can store them in your own hierarchy/folders in the way you like it.