Slashdot Mirror


Uwe Boll, Other Filmmakers Sue Thousands of Movie Pirates

linzeal writes "Directors whose films have done poorly at the box office are increasingly being solicited by high-powered law firms to file lawsuits with offers of settlement. This practice, which the EFF has been calling extortive and 'mafia-like', has resulted in courts starting to rule in favor of the consumer, and in some cases throwing out the lawsuits. This is all fine and dandy, however, when you are considered the world's worst director and you largely finance films through your own holding company. At that point, the rhetoric and ridicule gets ratcheted up rather quickly."

24 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry, I don't buy it. by Kelson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they seriously trying to convince me that someone would want to pirate Uwe Boll's movies?

    1. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by aquila.solo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they're being sued for bad taste?

    2. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, filmgoers damage Uwe Boll!

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    3. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are plenty of people who are into light to severe masochism out there, easily in the thousands.

      It's a gateway really. You watch Uwe Boll movies, and maybe Street Fighter, and tell yourself "It's so bad, its funny!" Eventually though, the crappulence gets boring, you move to harder stuff, like the Mortal Kombat movie (not the new proof of concept one). Before you know it, you're living in a gutter, offering sexual favors for a copy of the Star Wars Holiday special.

      I applaud Herr Boll for trying to clean up the streets and atone for his past actions.

    4. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by aevan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I misread it as Uwe Boll being sued BY thousands of movie pirates, demanding time and bandwidth back. Shouldn't be hard to prove watching the movie was damaging.

    5. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haven't they been punished enough for watching an Uwe Boll film?

    6. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by Surt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which Mortal Kombat movie? The first one was awesome. They had a pretty skilled fight choreographer who clearly had some actual MA experience.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_Kombat_(film)

      Even claims it is among the best VG->Movie films ever.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by selven · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're not just watching, they're distributing it too. Sorry, but putting those bits online is capital treason against the internet.

    8. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even claims it is among the best VG->Movie films ever.

      Being amongst the best VG->Movie films isn't saying that much.

    9. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      BloodRayne was absolute garbage. The only film I've seen that was worse was BloodRayne 2.

      I'll give Uwe Boll a point for accuracy. The movies were just as shitty as the games.

    10. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by mcvos · · Score: 2, Funny

      It also had Christopher Lambert.

      The guy is seriously underrated

      Underrated? There can be only one!

    11. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more than a little embarrassed to admit that I quite enjoyed Rampage. Boll's bad cinematography actually makes the movie work in a way I didn't expect.

      Really?
      Can you post a link to a torrent? ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  2. Let's solve the real problem by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hereby declare that on July 1st through July 4th we will celebrate the Independence of these United States by having a four day hunting season on trial lawyers. No bag limit! We do need certain rules to ensure fair chase:
    1. No hunting within 200 feet of an Ambulance.
    2. No standing on a corner yelling "Free Scotch".

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:Let's solve the real problem by BCW2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hunting Rules

      1. Any person with a valid State hunting license may harvest attorneys.

      2. Taking of attorneys with traps or dead falls is permitted. The use of currency as bait is prohibited.

      3. Killing of attorneys with a vehicle is prohibited. If accidentally struck, remove dead attorney to roadside and proceed to nearest car wash.

      4. It is unlawful to chase, herd, or harvest attorneys from a snow machine, helicopter, or aircraft.

      5. It shall be unlawful to shout “whiplash”, “ambulance”, or “free Perrier” for the purpose of trapping attorneys.

      6. It shall be unlawful to hunt attorneys within 100 yards of BMW dealerships.

      7. It shall be unlawful to use cocaine, young boys, $100 bills, prostitutes, or vehicle accidents to attract attorneys.

      8. It shall be unlawful to hunt attorneys within 200 yards of courtrooms, law libraries, health spas, gay bars, ambulances, or hospitals.

      9. If an attorney is elected to government office, it shall be a felony to hunt, trap, or possess it.

      10. Stuffed or mounted attorneys must have a state health department inspection for AIDS, rabies, and vermin.

      11. It shall be illegal for a hunter to disguise himself as a reporter, drug dealer, pimp, female legal clerk, sheep, accident victim, bookie, or tax accountant for the purpose of hunting attorneys.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  3. Alone in the Dark by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Uwe Boll's wikipedia entry (this is priceless): "Another reviewer wrote that Alone in the Dark was "so poorly built, so horribly acted and so sloppily stitched together that it's not even at the straight-to-DVD level."[16] For example, in one scene a character who was "killed" can visibly be seen getting up as the actor prematurely made the move to get off the set."

  4. a broken record? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    got a torrent?

  5. Re:Take that pirates! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the one hand, we have people who copy data without paying the creator. They have a small impact on the creators' financial incentive to create, and potentially reduce the cultural output.

    On the other hand, we have Uwe Boll, who produces films that are so mind shatteringly bad that people need weeks of expensive therapy after watching them, taking money away from competent film makers and causing an entire generation to lose respect for the cinematic medium.

    Finally, we have people who pirate Uwe Boll movies, intentionally spreading them to a large unsuspecting population.

    People in category one are selfish. The person in category two is unfortunate. The people in category three are dangerous sociopaths.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Re:Sure fire 100% guaranteed way by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure fire 100% guaranteed way to not get sued for pirating movies.

    Don't pirate movies.

    Hhhm, tell that to the printer at UW that got literally hundreds of DMCA notices.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  7. Boll has a big job ahead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Trying to win these cases. He has to convince a jury his movies are worth paying for.

  8. Re:Old news by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wouldn't want to see Stephen Wolfram without his robes, either.

  9. Re:This Slashdot Article Is Libel by Landshark17 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "None of these people are proven to be pirates. Uwe Boll claims they are."

    Uwe Boll also claims to be a film-maker, so I think it's clear we should take anything he says with a grain of salt.

    --
    This sig is false.
  10. Re:Sometimes I just want to watch a bad movie. by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Funny

    What exactly were you expecting?

    Shakespeare being recited in Latin, while the other persons head was being beaten in? Blood splatters everywhere...with a touch of humanism.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  11. Re:Rampage definitely worth your attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am not embarrassed at all regarding Rampage. I was pleasantly surprised and I sincerely think that anybody interested in a study of the origins of violence should give it a try.

    I'm downloading it as I type this

  12. Re:Old news by dylan_- · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wouldn't want to see Stephen Wolfram without his robes, either.

    And what about his wizard hat?

    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat