Slashdot Mirror


Uwe Boll, Other Filmmakers Sue Thousands of Movie Pirates

linzeal writes "Directors whose films have done poorly at the box office are increasingly being solicited by high-powered law firms to file lawsuits with offers of settlement. This practice, which the EFF has been calling extortive and 'mafia-like', has resulted in courts starting to rule in favor of the consumer, and in some cases throwing out the lawsuits. This is all fine and dandy, however, when you are considered the world's worst director and you largely finance films through your own holding company. At that point, the rhetoric and ridicule gets ratcheted up rather quickly."

13 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry, I don't buy it. by Kelson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they seriously trying to convince me that someone would want to pirate Uwe Boll's movies?

    1. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by aquila.solo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they're being sued for bad taste?

    2. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, filmgoers damage Uwe Boll!

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    3. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are plenty of people who are into light to severe masochism out there, easily in the thousands.

      It's a gateway really. You watch Uwe Boll movies, and maybe Street Fighter, and tell yourself "It's so bad, its funny!" Eventually though, the crappulence gets boring, you move to harder stuff, like the Mortal Kombat movie (not the new proof of concept one). Before you know it, you're living in a gutter, offering sexual favors for a copy of the Star Wars Holiday special.

      I applaud Herr Boll for trying to clean up the streets and atone for his past actions.

    4. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by aevan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I misread it as Uwe Boll being sued BY thousands of movie pirates, demanding time and bandwidth back. Shouldn't be hard to prove watching the movie was damaging.

    5. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haven't they been punished enough for watching an Uwe Boll film?

    6. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by Surt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which Mortal Kombat movie? The first one was awesome. They had a pretty skilled fight choreographer who clearly had some actual MA experience.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_Kombat_(film)

      Even claims it is among the best VG->Movie films ever.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by selven · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're not just watching, they're distributing it too. Sorry, but putting those bits online is capital treason against the internet.

    8. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even claims it is among the best VG->Movie films ever.

      Being amongst the best VG->Movie films isn't saying that much.

    9. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      BloodRayne was absolute garbage. The only film I've seen that was worse was BloodRayne 2.

      I'll give Uwe Boll a point for accuracy. The movies were just as shitty as the games.

  2. Alone in the Dark by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Uwe Boll's wikipedia entry (this is priceless): "Another reviewer wrote that Alone in the Dark was "so poorly built, so horribly acted and so sloppily stitched together that it's not even at the straight-to-DVD level."[16] For example, in one scene a character who was "killed" can visibly be seen getting up as the actor prematurely made the move to get off the set."

  3. Re:Take that pirates! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the one hand, we have people who copy data without paying the creator. They have a small impact on the creators' financial incentive to create, and potentially reduce the cultural output.

    On the other hand, we have Uwe Boll, who produces films that are so mind shatteringly bad that people need weeks of expensive therapy after watching them, taking money away from competent film makers and causing an entire generation to lose respect for the cinematic medium.

    Finally, we have people who pirate Uwe Boll movies, intentionally spreading them to a large unsuspecting population.

    People in category one are selfish. The person in category two is unfortunate. The people in category three are dangerous sociopaths.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Re:This Slashdot Article Is Libel by Landshark17 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "None of these people are proven to be pirates. Uwe Boll claims they are."

    Uwe Boll also claims to be a film-maker, so I think it's clear we should take anything he says with a grain of salt.

    --
    This sig is false.