Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia To Unlock Frequently Vandalized Pages

netbuzz writes "In an effort to encourage greater participation, Wikipedia, the self-described 'online encyclopedia that anyone can edit,' is turning to tighter editorial control as a substitute for simply 'locking' those entries that frequently attract mischief makers and ideologues. The new system, which will apply to a maximum of 2,000 most-vulnerable pages, is sure to create controversies of its own."

7 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, "ideology" is why the page on electrolytes gets replaced with the words "what plants crave" every damn week.

  2. Re:Which pages? by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's an alarmingly high number of World of Warcraft pages on that list. I think I've finally lost all faith in humanity.

  3. Re:Hypocrisy by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who gets to define neutral though?

    If you can't define 'Neutral', just look it up.

    Duh.

  4. Re:Hypocrisy by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll save you a click: For Neutral Point of View on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:NPOV.

    And I'll save you another click. The text on that page has been changed fifteen times by six different people over the last twenty-four hours.

  5. Re:Yep by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't be daft. Obviously George W. Bush is a human being, not Satan or some evil presence that has haunted man since the dawn of time.

    Dick Cheney, however...

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. Re:Hypocrisy by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, what makes a Wikipedia editor go neutral? Is it lust for gold? Power? Or were they just born with a heart full of neutrality?

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  7. Re:Oh really? Then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Irregardless...