Slashdot Mirror


Spamhaus Fine Reduced From $11.7M To $27K

eldavojohn writes "In 2006, anti-spam crusader Spamhaus was sued for 'defamation, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and interference with existing contracts' after blocking 'promotional e-mails' from e360. What with the case being in Illinois and Spamhaus being a British outfit, Spamhaus didn't bloody care. So, e360 was awarded $11.7 million in damages, which was later thrown out in an appeals court with a request for the lower court to come up with actual damage estimates instead of the ridiculous $11.7 million. (e360 had originally stated $135M, then $122M, and then $30M as sums of damages.) As a result, the actual damages were estimated to be just $27,002. While this is a massive reduction in the fine and a little bit more realistic, I think it is important to note that Spamhaus is a service that people proactively utilize. They don't force you to use their anti-spam identification system — it's totally opt-in. And now they're being fined what a foreign judge found to be 'one month of additional work on behalf of the customers' to a company they allegedly incorrectly identified as spam. Sad and scary precedent."

1 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Spamhaus was right to ignore it... by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You do not get to ignore any court for any reason just because you A) do not live near there

    Yes you fucking do. Try suing somebody in India or China (I can guess where you live, fatty) and see how far you get.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."