Slashdot Mirror


Afghan Tech Minerals — Cure, Curse, Or Hype?

Gooseygoose writes "The Pentagon revealed recently that Afghanistan has as much as $1 trillion in mineral wealth, a potential game changer in the ongoing conflict there. Many news outlets have picked up this story, some simply repeating the official talking points, while others raise serious concerns. Is this 'discovery' just hype, or will it truly alter the landscape of the Afghan war? Perhaps more importantly, can this mineral wealth (whether real or illusory) pave the way to a peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan, or is it more likely to drive geopolitical feedback loops that plunge the region further into turmoil?" Relatedly, Marc Ambinder wrote a few days ago in the Atlantic that the US had knowledge of vast mineral deposits in Afghanistan several years ago, giving the recent announcement the appearance of a PR campaign.

4 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. It is just PR... by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 5, Informative

    El Reg just thinks it is a complete PR exercise.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/18/afghanistan_mineral_report/

    Extracting the wealth is neither simple or sensible.

    --
    wot no sig
  2. Wealth won't help by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Poor religious nutballs will just become rich religious nutballs. And if anyone thinks that the Afghan mainstream aren't a bunch of religious nutballs, go rent a documentary called Afghan Star (about the Afghan equivalent of "American Idol") and watch what happens when a female contestant dares to dance on stage.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Wealth won't help by nyctopterus · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a problem both the left and the right don't seem to be able to face. The majority of people in a lot of middle eastern counties support a kind of religious tyranny whether they are wealthy or not. Not all people, by any means, but a majority. Bring democracy and wealth to these places without liberalism is not going to get the results we want. In fact it's going to bring disaster, by giving radical religious tyranny democratic legitimacy and the wealth to throw their weight around.

      The liberal part of rich liberal democracies is the most important ingredient. Democracy is more of a safety valve, the riches a by-product (and luck, of course).

  3. Re:We're forgetting someone by TDyl · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The Taliban were legitimate bad guys"

    These are the same "Taliban" that the US funded for decades and for whom they provided training and other non-munition resources. The history of the US is one of hypocrisy and so many double standards that I wonder if you are on no one elses side other than your own perverted sense of morality and ethics.

    --
    Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them