Slashdot Mirror


Tornado Scientists Butt Heads With Storm Chasers

An anonymous reader writes "Tornado researchers say amateurs — inspired by movies like Twister and shows like Storm Chasers — are getting in their way, hampering science and creating hazards. 'Hundreds of camera-toting amateurs in cars ended up chasing the same storms as a fleet of scientific vehicles during the high-profile research project, called Vortex2, which wrapped up data collection this week. At times the line of traffic caused the Midwestern roads to look like the freeways of Los Angeles, said Roger Wakimoto, director of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, during a briefing for reporters this week. "I worry about this as a safety hazard," Mr. Wakimoto said. "These people were blocking our escape routes because of the sheer number of cars."' Storm chasers say they have as much right to watch storms as Ph.D.s."

15 of 402 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Big fucking deal. by earls · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed, the scientists started somewhere, just because the "amateurs" aren't being compensated and don't have a million dollar chase vehicle doesn't mean they have any less right to follow the storms - fuck off.

  2. Re:Storm chasers say they have as much right to wa by brainboyz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if it does get them killed, every last one of the bunch stuck in traffic went there knowing they could get blocked in by other people. Who says the PhD types couldn't contribute to some amateurs getting killed? There's a storm that can put a toothpick through an oak tree: everyone running towards it is responsible for their own consequences.

  3. Re:Big fucking deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, but the chasers are just there to go "hyurp, issa terrnado!" while the scientists are there to learn about tornadoes and how they form so they can save thousands of lives.

  4. Just as much right? by theghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps, in a painfully literal sense, but claiming that your desire to seek an adrenaline high is just as valid as their desire to do research that will save lives is high asshattery.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    1. Re:Just as much right? by GooberToo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The entire thing about "storm chasing saves lives" is complete bunk to give the PhD's moral authority over the amateur chasers who are in it for the thrill.

      All I can say is, "WHOOOSH!"

      The entire point of the research is to better improve tornado detection, tracking, and analysis. As well as to better predict when and where they'll pop up. In short, they absolutely DO have moral authority on the scene. That's not to say every trip raises the bar for what science can do, but just the same, the entire purpose for them to be there absolutely establishes morale authority in hopes to further improve things for EVERYONE - including these thrill seeking fuck-tards. If this were not true, there would be no need for continued research. And at this time there exists a need for LOTS of continued research. In short, the fact that a need persists, in of itself, establishes morale authority.

      Anyone else who isn't contributing to the scientific body of knowledge has no right or need to be there. Even with established criminal laws, its illegal for them to be there; such that it hinders a scientist's ability to "safely" conduct research. This is called reckless endangerment. Should the worst happen, these idiots are setting themselves up for both criminal and civil prosecution - to wit I sincerely hope the law does so to its fullest extent possible. If you bother to read the provided link, you'll find this fuck-tard behavior of people who don't need to be there are the literal definition of reckless endangerment. So in short, morally and legally they shouldn't be there so long as they are creating these types of hazards for legitimate researchers.

  5. Re:Big fucking deal. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt that many of these folk will become scientists.
    Why they have the right to be stupid let's be honest.
    1. This is a dangerous activity.
    2. They have caused issues with scientists trying to do proper data collection.
    3. They could cause problems for first responders trying to help people.
    So yes the have the right but is it ethical or even morally right to get in the way of real scientists?
    I would say that most of these folk should get the heck off the rode and let the professionals have their crack at getting real data that might actually end up helping people.
    Otherwise they are just using their right to be dumb jerks to hurt the advancement of science for in exchange for some thrill seeking.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  6. Re:Storm chasers say they have as much right to wa by SleazyRidr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that the amateurs are just there for kicks, they should know and accept that they are willingly putting themselves into a risky situation.

    The PhDs also know that they are willingly putting themselves into a risky situation, but they are doing so to increase the sum of human knowledge, which makes it slightly more worthwhile.

  7. Dr. Joshua Wurman.... by malakai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What this article fails to mention is one of the reasons Vortex2 even got a go was partially because of the success and semi-stardom Dr. Josh Wurman got from participating in "Storm Chasers".

    The publicity that show generated for them no doubt helped lube the federal funding money chute.

    Besides, you can't just declare martial law and saw "No one can storm chase". There's no solution that will ever be enacted that ends with making it illegal, so you may as well stop bitching about it and simply work with the other guys. I'm amazed there isn't a federal call center or something for these chasers to all phone in to, and a website with realtime dopplar radar provided to them. The faster these guys report a tornado on a ground, the easier it is for the weather people to push a button for a siren or some other event.

    This just sounds like sour grapes. You could see the annoyance on the part of the "funded" scientist when that little no-name crew successfully flew a model airplane around a tornado and dropped sensors into it. The fact that was done on a budget put together by selling Tornado videos to news channels sounds like a win/win for me. Took none of my tax dollars, and reaped novel data.

  8. Re:Storm chasers say they have as much right to wa by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who says the PhD types couldn't contribute to some amateurs getting killed?

    Well, the PhDs have a little thing called KNOWING WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE DOING.

    There's a storm that can put a toothpick through an oak tree: everyone running towards it is responsible for their own consequences.

    But apparently not the consequences their ignorance and sense of entitlement force on others.

  9. Re:Storm chasers say they have as much right to wa by EricWright · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you sure? I have a PhD and sometimes, I don't know what the fuck I'm doing. I'm just making it up as I go along...

    Lucky for society my PhD isn't related to my job.

  10. Re:Big fucking deal. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He didn't say that, you stuffed your own definition in there.
    real scientist.
    Someone who collects data and applies the scientific method to it.

    Most of these amateur storm watchers don't do that. They get a camera and take photos. Hardly any of them will do any research.

    Those people are in the way.

    You have a right to stand around and gawk,, but when you get in the way you are being a dick.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Re:What a joke by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand this anti-intellectual campaign. Is it so hard to understand that if you don't have a degree then chances are you don't know what you are talking about?

    Actually the problem people have is with the arrogance and egotism of people who have pieces of paper. Simply because I don't have a piece of paper, doesn't mean I don't have a clue on how to plot my own weather maps and provide valid meteorological data to other sources. I can do both. But I've got no paper, but I have been studying weather since I was a kid. So 22 years give or take.

    The interesting thing is, I can say the same about people in many scientific fields. The reality is, many academia believe that if you have a piece of paper your knowledge is more worthy then the guy who doesn't. Even if your paper is from another distant field that isn't related.

    To sum it up, a 4 year education doesn't mean you have enough experience to understand more then the guy on the ground who's been doing it for 40 years without the same. You probably don't.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  12. Re:Big fucking deal. by Kreigaffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except you're missing a pretty important point.

    Sure, everyone's got a right to the road. Thing is these amateurs are getting in the way of people who are trying to study this shit so we can better understand and so better prepare and warn people of disaster.

    In other words, the amateurs have their heads up their asses. Yeah, they have as much right as the PhDs to be there, but what they SHOULD do, were they decent people, is concede that people other than themselves are better able to do better work and that because of this they should allow them better access.

    If someone's choking to death, only an asshole would stand in the way of trained paramedics and claim that they have just as much right to stand there as the paramedic. That's a thin analogy but still works -- get the hell out of the way of the professionals, they know what they're doing more than you do.

    --
    ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
  13. Re:Storm chasers say they have as much right to wa by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you sure? I have a PhD and sometimes, I don't know what the fuck I'm doing. I'm just making it up as I go along...

    When you graduate from high school you know everything.

    When you graduate from college you realize you don't actually know everything.

    When you get a masters' degree you realize you don't know *anything*.

    When you get a PhD you realize nobody else does, either.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  14. Re:Storm chasers say they have as much right to wa by Vasheron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As Einstein famously pointed out, "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?"