Slashdot Mirror


Home Computers Equal Lower Test Scores

An anonymous reader writes "Politicians and education activists have long sought to eliminate the 'digital divide' by guaranteeing universal access to home computers, and in some cases to high-speed Internet service. But a Duke University study finds these efforts would actually widen the achievement gap in math and reading scores. Students in grades five through eight, particularly those from disadvantaged families, tend to post lower scores once these technologies arrive in their homes."

9 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Well, no shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without a computer you have to learn how to think.

    1. Re:Well, no shit by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      higher test scores != learning more

      More and more school districts and states are moving towards using standardized tests to measure "learning". If you only teach students to score well on those tests then they aren't "learning" as much as they are "memorizing facts". Teaching kids how to think, critical thinking, reasoning, etc will benefit them (and the rest of us) much more in the long run ... there just aren't any easy ways to measure that kind of performance.

      You teach a kid 'how to think' and then sit them in front of 'World of Goo', 'Gears', etc and you'll see they can 'think'.

    2. Re:Well, no shit by blankinthefill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Standardized test scores are not, in and of themselves, evil. They are actually pretty useful tools for measuring the performance a student is capable of when used in moderation. It's the increasing focus put on standardized testing in the US that is creating the problem. When everything from school funding to teacher performance is dependent on these tests, it becomes more and more important for the SCHOOL how the kids do on the test. This leads to a huge increase in teaching specifically to the test, from what types of questions will be on it to testing techniques. There is also a lot of pressure on students to perform well. This leads to less general teaching, which would allow most students to pass the test just fine, and give better numbers, and more teaching to the test, which is good for the scores on one test, and good for the school, but terrible for the student.

  2. Re:from the article by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >>In disadvantaged households, parents are less likely to monitor children's computer use and guide children in using computers for educational purposes.

    Which is why the entire digital divide issue is stupid, in my opinion.

    Unless a kid is growing up without any exposure to computers at all, he'll be technologically proficient by the time he graduates. Study after study show that using technology often hurts, instead of helps, student performance.

    I say this as someone who teaches teachers how to use technology in the classroom, and I start every lecture by saying, "Only use it when there's a damn good reason to do so."

    And there *are* good reasons to do so. Sometimes. But the way that most schools use computers is nothing short of neglect.

  3. The focus has to be on guiding students by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Young children are thirsty for knnowledge. Anyone who has had any exposure to a 6-8 year old in the "why daddy" stage knows this. The problem is this is not fostered in many kids. If, at this stage, children are taught how to answer their own questions, using the tools available to them, then it will foster a lifetime of learning.

    This is what my parents did with me, although in my day it was "why don't you go get the encyclopedia and we will look it up together?". Nowadays it should be "why don't we go look at the computer together". Guided by a parent, from a YOUNG AGE, this helps in several ways

    - It teaches kids that, if they have questions, the materials are available to help them. They don't have to sit in ignorance just because they don't know the answer.

    - It teaches kids how to find information when they need it

    - It teaches kids how to think critically about that information, and discard the good from the bad.

     

  4. Re:from the article by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find there's often no good reason to use a computer. I see people with their $200 PalmPilots and it takes them twice as long to make notes as I do with a free pencil-and-paper. I see students carry laptops into classsrooms and same deal - they are slower than old fashioned note taking

    Internet-capable devices are good for lookups of wikipedia, but I doubt that's needed in a classroom setting below grade 9. The computer becomes a way to goof-off.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  5. No quite by arpad1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not the computer that's at fault but the people who are responsible for the idea.

    The "activists" contribute their moral outrage but don't much care if the kids actually get an education. It's the opportunity to display moral outrage that's the pay off for the activists. If the kids don't learn anything that's another opportunity to display moral outrage.

    The politicians want to look like they're doing something and preferably with other people's money - getting something for nothing, even something useless, is politically worthwhile. Does it matter if the kids learn? Obviously not.

    There's really only one group that has an unquestionable claim to be concerned primarily with education and that's the parents. They're not consulted because they might ask uncomfortable questions like "Will the computer do anything worthwhile?" Neither the activists nor the politicians are interested in having to answer questions like that.

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  6. Computers are tools, not miracles by whizbang77045 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We somehow take technology, and expect miracles from it, far beyond what the users are capable of doing. Computers are tools, and they are only going to produce what the users are willing to invest in them of their time and effort. Disadvantaged kids need to learn how to study and investigate, before they will be able to use a computer to its potential as a learning aid. If they don't read or investigate now, computers aren't going to produce some sort of overnight change.

  7. This shows the uselessness of test scores by mantis2009 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's more important in life? Computer skills or getting high test scores?