Slashdot Mirror


Australia Gets Its First Female Prime Minister

An anonymous reader writes "Julia Gillard has been elected unopposed to the Labor leadership, seizing power in a bloodless Parliament House coup after Prime Minister Kevin Rudd decided not to contest this morning's leadership ballot. Ms. Gillard will now be sworn in as Australia's first female prime minister. Emerging from this morning's meeting, she said she felt 'very honored' and said she would be making a statement shortly. Treasurer Wayne Swan now steps up as deputy prime minister. He was also elected unopposed."

17 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Please by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone tell me if i should hate her or not, the internet has failed me so far

    1. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      She has been one of the 4 key players in setting the governments policy, The disasterous and disgusting waste of money on the education scheme is her botched piece of shit. If Labour were serious about change then they would have dumped her along with Rudd. So different anme, same shit but even more extreme.

    2. Re:Please by bloodhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess it depends. If you thought Rudd was doing a bad job then you should hate her too, she is just as responsible for the current state of the government as he is as she is one of the core policy setting pollies. You could also wait a few days to see if she drops conroy, if she doesn't then you should view her with the same disdain we all view him with as a vote her her is a vote for his state driven censorship.

  2. Re:"First Female PM" is not news. by Zonnald · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's not forget that in Sydney we have a Female Lord-Mayor, NSW has a Female Premier and Governor. So really this is not new ground for Australia - least NSW.

  3. Re:"First Female PM" is not news. by MishgoDog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, what's more interesting is the manner in which she was appointed (as opposed to elected). Internal party politics ousted Kevin Rudd, and appointed Gillard in his place - a few months before a likely Federal election.
    It's in interesting idea!

  4. Re:I for one... by H0D_G · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wrong. first redheaded PM was James Scullin

    --
    Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your home!
  5. Re:The Aussie public had no say . . . by mabinogi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The did have a say - they had their say in 2007, and will have another say in only a couple of months.

    Australians vote for their local members, and the party (or coalition) with the most members forms government.
    The party then elects their leader, who becomes prime minister.

    Labor elected Rudd initially, and now they decided to elect Gillard instead.
    Also, she was deputy Prime Minister, and went as such into the election, so it's not like people were voting for Labor without the knowledge that she would have some power - and that she'd be filling in as PM from time to time anyway.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  6. Re:"First Female PM" is not news. by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Agreed. There are two reasons why this should be a story on Slashdot, and neither of them relate to Ms. Gillard's gender.

    1. This is the first time that a serving Prime Minister has been deposed by his own party without even having completed his first term of office (not counting those that died in office, or were temporary caretaker PMs such as Forde). That alone is newsworthy and will make today a notable day in Australian poltical history. What's more, it would have to also be the most rapid fall from grace of a PM in living memory - Kevin Rudd, as recently as three months ago, was enjoying one of the highest approval ratings of any PM, ever. And now he is gone, removed by the very colleagues who as little as 48 hours ago were voicing complete support for him.

    2. More relevant to Slashdot as a technology-related site, this coup means that there will be a ministerial reshuffle and a new Cabinet. Which means there is a good chance that Senator Conroy will be dumped as Communications Minister. Perhaps in favour of Kate Lundy (although this is far from certain). Given that the internet filter proposal was already on shaky ground (Labor has quietly been putting it on the backburner as being "too toxic a topic" for an election year), this may be the extra push needed to make sure it sinks into oblivion (and good riddance!).

    Whatever happens, it certainly has been a dramatic day in politics. It has made the upcoming election, which was looking to be one of the most boring in recent history, into something a little bit more interesting ;)

  7. Re:The Aussie public had no say . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They do. Westminster system. We do not elect the prime minister, we elect the parliament. The parliament elects the prime minister. If a political party holds more than 50% of the parliament, then this will be the (party-)elected leader of that party. The only non-members of parliament who voted for Kevin Rudd are the labour voters in his local electorate in QLD. Might wanna read up on how our democracy works sometime...

  8. Re:"First Female PM" is not news. by Cimexus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Newcastle Sydney Wollongong, obviously. The limits of the known world.

  9. Re:The Aussie public had no say . . . by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm going to assume the parent is American and thus doesn't realise what the office of Prime Minister actually represents. If the parent is Australian, then, I don't know what to say :P

    The Prime Minister is the almost-exact equivalent of the House Majority Leader in the US. The leader of the political party currently holding the most seats in the lower house/chamber.

    In the US, the House Majority Leader is not directly elected. Similarly, neither is the Prime Minister in the UK, Canada, Australia, NZ, or any other Westminster system country. This does not mean those countries are not democracies.

  10. Re:Strewth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  11. Need +1 evil by ynotds · · Score: 5, Informative

    Never has anything more inappropriate been said by accident.

    (Julia has been attacked by a notorious opposition ratbag for being childless by choice.)

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  12. Re:Interesting Historical Fact by weicco · · Score: 2, Informative

    Technically speaking, no. We vote the parliament, not the cabinet. The parliament elected Kiviniemi to run the cabinet last week. The parliament is perfectly capable to do this with the mandate we gave them back in 2007.

    --
    You don't know what you don't know.
  13. Re:Interesting Historical Fact by macron1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah of course. I was pointing out that NZs first female PM got in without winning an election, just like Canada, just like Australia.

  14. Re:"First Female PM" is not news. by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reptilians in human bodies don't count.

  15. Re:"First Female PM" is not news. by VJ42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The fact that it is our first female PM is what makes it news.

    Why? Because at least you got your first female head of state before the USA? Instead of years after dozens of other countries did? Including at least one Islamic country?

    Australia's head of State is the Queen, not the PM; their PM is merely the head of government.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me