Sending Data In Bursts of SMS Messages
An anonymous reader writes "Canadian carrier Rogers has been experiencing some extreme loads of late, as researchers at the University of Waterloo investigate the potential for sending data spread across bursts of hundreds of text messages. They sent around 80,000 messages in the course of a project testing a new protocol able to cram 32KB into 250 messages sent from a BlackBerry, reaching a rate of 20 bytes per second. The group thinks its protocol could be useful in rural areas of the developing world where text messaging is the only affordable, reliable link."
Make sure you get the "unlimited" text messaging plan before trying this...
...and got to feel the thrill of competition again.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
In a completely unrelated story, the University of Waterloo has an unexpected ~$16,000 shortfall this quarter.
I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
Text messages are one of the most awful forms of data on the cell network. On a 3G type network, they are just data, so hey, if you can do TXT on 3G, just do data. So what?
But on older networks, such as the proposed usage, they take up CONTROL channel space, and too much SMS is a DOS attack!
See Exploiting Open Functionality in SMS-Capable Cellular Networks:
Test your net with Netalyzr
If it's anything else, drive to Starbucks for free wifi.
Because Starbucks is so commonplace in the "rural areas of the developing world."
... next year's April 1 RFC -- "IP over SMS Carrier".
I think this is more a case of "Look mama, IP over SMS! With No hands!" than a solution for any real world problem.
WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
In emerging economies SMS is dirt cheap. In Philippines: $0.50, 24 hour all you can eat (on-net only) deals are common.
This is a bad idea for a large number of technical reasons : very inefficient use of the GSM channel because of all of the excessive handshaking and control just to transmit a 140 byte data packet for one (sms is 7bit per character. 160 chars = 140bytes) and rubbish throughput & latency. But economically it makes sense. Also accessibility of 2G mobile phones is very high in such environments, 3G wireless or twisted pair copper not so much. Depends where you deploy it, for what eventual purpose and actual real bandwidth requirements.
This is good news (everyone), by the time you have torrented your bluray rip, it will be out of copyright.
Or not.
They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
Maximum carrying load of a Yak: 70kg
Weight of a 32GB micro sd card. 0.5g
Having your own 3rd world petabit network: priceless.
Maybe they should just make normal data transfer reasonably priced instead of jacking up SMS pricing...