Slashdot Mirror


Google Considers China's "Web Mapping License"

eldavojohn writes "Back in May, China rolled out new laws requiring online mapping services to be 'certified' by the State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping. The laws appear to go into effect this month. Today an AFP article outlines Google's consideration of these rules and notes that it's unlikely Google will meet the qualifications to become certified as all of its servers holding the mapping data are outside of China. The AFP also reported that 'Foreign firms wanting to provide mapping and surveying services in China are required to set up joint ventures or partnerships with local firms.' Unless large changes are made, Google's services might get a lot more stunted as China regulates onward."

17 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Some Additional Speculation by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The AFP also reported that 'Foreign firms wanting to provide mapping and surveying services in China are required to set up joint ventures or partnerships with local firms.'

    I omitted my commentary on this particular clause as it's pretty much just speculation but I would claim that the government is encouraging/requiring/enabling corporate espionage. Not to mention the probably very sensitive close up data Google may or may not have of areal images of the United States. Now, it might just be that the government wants to foster local businesses but I would argue that it has more to do with strategy and espionage. I know I'd be uncomfortable.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Some Additional Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      bending laws to benefit local companies is something the US does every day through import restrictions, excise etc etc, why exactly should china behave different? (note: I don't support this, but if it is good for the goose then it's good for the gander)

    2. Re:Some Additional Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, no, no, bending local laws is the worst thing and US doesn't do it; US bends foreign laws, I guess that's quite noble.

    3. Re:Some Additional Speculation by Xest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Whether the motivation is espionage or "encouraging growth of domestic companies", the results are similar. China has no problems bending the laws to benefit their companies at the expense of foreign ones."

      Sorry, but how is this different from the US exactly?

      - The current BP leak is a fine example, BP is being held to higher standards than the US companies that are responsible for Exxon Valdez sized leaks every single year in Nigeria, and well, Bhopal is a fine example of US environmental hypocrisy too

      - BAE was fined by the US over a bribery scandal in the Saudi Eurofighter deal, yet US companies do this exact same thing all the time

      - Boeing was given massively unfair advantage in the next generation tanker deal

      Other examples where the US has acted illegaly in a similar respect include lumber (Complainant: Canada), cotton (Complainant: Brazil), steel (Complainant: Britain), online gambling (Complainant: Antigua).

      It's a bit rich for an American company to complain about an overseas company bending the law to favour local companies when the US is one of the worst offenders internationally for this sort of thing.

      It's hard to look badly at China when they do this- at least they're open and honest about it, which is more than can be said about the US' hush hush attitude to turning a blind eye to corrupt practices for local companies, and the environmental irresponsibility of US companies overseas. It's hard to even blame China when they look across the Pacific and see the US doing exactly the same sort of thing.

  2. This is a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is designed to simply drain the IP from western companies into Chinese ones. This is on top of China having their money fixed against the dollar.Yes, they said that they would change it a bit, but inside of 2 days, they rolled back the change. Quit honestly, China is an a cold war with the west via economic means. At this time, the west needs to tell CHina to either obey their agreements (float their money, drop their trade barriers, quit dumping/subsidizing, follow through on their international agreements such as CLintons as well as IMF) OR simply impose a slowly increasing tariff on ALL GOODS coming from China. If the west, India, and Brazil will follow through on this, then China WILL obey their agreements.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      simply impose a slowly increasing tariff

      No need. China is about to experience a labor revolution such as has never occurred anywhere in Asia. Major manufacturers (Toyota, Nissan, Foxconn, etc.) are experiencing labor strikes and capitulating with large wage increases. The best thing we can do is continue to buy their stuff and fuel their demand for labor. Once their working class feels its oats it will overrun the county and China will cease to provide an endless horizon of subsistence wages.

      This won't be students in a square with microphones. It will be angry workers with pipes and accelerants.

    2. Re:This is a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      China is building 1-2 new Boomer and 1-2 new attack subs each year. They are now regularly patrol every ocean except Atlantic (and they just cut a deal with Venezuela for docking rights for their nuke subs). In addition, they have re-started their nuke warhead production lines.
      They have multiple space stations going up, all controlled by the PLA. Only the first one will allow none chinese on-board. The others are said to only allow Chinese military on-board.
      They are hard at work on Lasers on the ground for anti-sats and apparently some smaller ones as well (think that will fit in their space stations).

      China does not believe in MAD. MAD is a defensive idea. China's PLA is on the offensive.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:This is a joke by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That all sounds very interesting, do you have a link for where to read more on it?

  3. US should respond by should_be_linear · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In such case of foreign government blackmailing Google, US should respond with serious measures towards China companies and their operations in US. However, knowing how weak Obama is when it comes to nations he cannot mindlessly bomb all day using drones, nothing will happen.

    --
    839*929
  4. Another Grab at intellectual property by Tisha_AH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not even a very well veiled attempt to get any company that wants to do business in China to open up all of their source code and "hand the keys to the kingdom" to the Chinese government.

    Ironically I bet there are companies that carry a big IP hammer to beat up the rest of the world with will be beating down the doors to become slavering lapdogs of China for a chance at the profits pie. Of course China will say "you companies just do not understand China so we need to repackage everything you do to fit our "culture"". What they are really meaning is that "Give us all of the stuff and we will let you play in our sandbox... until we can reverse engineer your application or system and stick a "Made in China" label on it. The we will give you the boot or make the conditions so impossible for you to do business you will run out with your tails between your legs".

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:Another Grab at intellectual property by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The irony is that companies that do everything China wants often get little in return. Look at Microsoft. They gave China the source code to their software. Gave them nearly free licensing of Windows and they hardly make any money there at all!

      http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/1832381/Gates-Lets-China-Peek-Through-Windows.htm

      February 28, 2003
      By Mark Berniker: More stories by this author:
      Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates on a tour in China said his company will allow the Chinese government partial access to the source code of its Windows operating system.

      Microsoft said it would only share some details about its proprietary source code, but it's considered a major win for Microsoft to have China join its Government Security Program (GSP). China is one of several countries, including Russia, NATO and the United Kingdom, participating in the recently launched Microsoft program aimed, at part, in trying to reverse negative perceptions of the company.

      At issue, is whether Microsoft's software provides adequate security for governments, and their classified data. Piracy of Microsoft software in China is also a huge problem, and the Chinese government and Microsoft are keen to jointly stem its tide.

      Microsoft has clearly made a decision that China, the world's biggest market with immense potential for growth over the next decade, is a place it will be putting considerable resources towards. Microsoft has said it will invest $750 million in China from 2003-2005.

      and now in 2010....

      http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-24/microsoft-s-ballmer-says-china-piracy-is-a-problem-update1-.html

      Lack of progress in protecting intellectual property has led China, which may overtake the U.S. as the world’s biggest personal-computer market in a year, to generate less revenue for Microsoft than India and South Korea, Ballmer said. China’s gross domestic product is twice the two economies combined.

  5. Re:Good ol protectionism by AdamCa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pretty much, this is the face of world diplomacy, with the control of information they are free to accuse the world of things like protectionism while keeping their own internal appearance clean. Doesn't really matter what the world thinks of them.

  6. Re:Good ol protectionism by wealthychef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your aim is not to make the world fair for everyone but to make it best for yourself. Learn to politic.

    I can see how that would work out great for the world. The only reason that appeals to fairness have any effect is that people actually care about actual fairness. Cynicism and resignation have never gotten anything worthwhile in this world. Diplomacy aside, protectionism is bullshit by and large, and China needs to be called on it just like we do.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  7. Re:Wait! -- What's that? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People too cowardly to tear every Communist Party member's head off deserve the kind of rule the Party gives them.

    What a brutish approach to politics."So a few million die" - so why haven't you resorted to violence against anything your government does that you don't like? I'm sure you could drum up enough of a local militia to send a message. I mean you clearly don't fear death or arrest or abuse.

    When the strong oppress the weak, saying the weak deserve it because they are weak makes you sound like the biggest bigot ever and is incredibly short-sighted. That's the kind of attitude that promotes slavery and abuse of women. If you don't want to be grouped with those people, you better find a way to defend that claim or retract it.

  8. Re:Two Words... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once their money comes back into balance with the dollar, they will collapse

    Once their money comes back into balance with the dollar, you'll find the US economy will collapse as a major amount of the US national debt is held by the Chinese. It started off as a cheap way to fund American consumerism without having to worry - after all, China buys your bonds and you spend the cash they just gave you on Chinese goods - wins all round!

    But.. that means they hold an enormous amount on US debt. If they decided to sell it on, both Yuan and the dollar would take an almighty hit - enough to pretty much collapse the US economy. Fortunately the Yuan is pegged to the dollar and doesn't float about - which could cause a bit of a collapse in either currency depending on which way it moved,

    See, if the Yuan devalued against the dollar, they'd stop buying US debt. And so the cost of selling that debt would increase - the US needs to keep selling debt partly to fund the previous debt repayments - if the interest payments went up... you can see that wouldn't be good for the US. Considering how huge the debt is, that wouldn't be good at all.

    Also, if the dollar didn't buy as much yuan as before, that would mean inflation for the US - no more cheap goods to buy.

    So really, the US needs China to keep the dollar high. If they stop, you, them, and almost everybody is screwed. (Ok, maybe the Eurozone would come out of it better - assuming it doesn't collapse itself)

  9. Re:Good ol protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's ironic, really. While China manages to get away with murder by clamping down on internet freedoms, America's international reputation is constantly battered by American citizens handing over embarrassing secrets to sites like Wikileaks.

    It seems that encouraging people to think of themselves as free is, ultimately, a self-defeating policy. Americans have no sense of what is responsible. I'll believe Wikileaks is doing the world a favor when I see it leaking information about an actual oppressive freedom-hating regime like Russia or China, instead of only hurting open democracies while the dictators laugh.

  10. Tibet by kievit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All comments so far are about economic/IP aspects. What about the political/cultural aspect of mapping? China could use this policy to enforce its preferred representation of the Tibet area. Like: replace all traditional Tibet names with new Chinese ones.