Slashdot Mirror


A Professional Perspective On Apple's Retina Display

Reader BWJones, who is a retinal scientist, sends in this detailed analysis of the iPhone 4's "retinal display," which includes photomicrographs of the display pixels of earlier generations of iPhone as well as the iPad. Well worth a read. "... as you can see from these images of the displays I captured under a microscope, the pixels are not square. Rather they are rectangular, and while the short axis is 78 microns, the long axis on the iPhone 4 pixel is somewhere in the neighborhood of 102 microns. ... While [an earlier analysis by] Dr. Soneira was partially correct with respect to the retina, Apple's Retina Display adequately represents the resolution at which images fall upon our retina. ... [I] find Apple's claims stand up to what the human eye can perceive."

1 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. DPI is irrelevant, it's just TOO SMALL by petes_PoV · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    It's only a 4 inch display at 800x400. That wasn't big enough for even the lowliest laptops 25 years ago and it isn't enough now. It doesn't matter how you try to spin it, market it or come up with some magical new terms to flummox the gullible. It just isn't large enough.

    With displays big is good, bigger is better and huge is best. There is no alternative.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons