Slashdot Mirror


iOS Update May Tackle iPhone 4's Antenna Problems

DJRumpy was one of several readers to point out rumors that Apple will soon be deploying an update to iOS 4 to combat the iPhone 4 antenna problems we discussed last week. This could be good news for users of the 1.7 million iPhone 4s purchased during the first three days of its release. (And no, Daily Mail, Steve didn't announce a recall, though there's speculation that this problem could be a boon for Android.) An anonymous reader notes an analysis of a teardown of the phone, which found that its parts collectively cost about $188, with the most expensive part — the LCD screen — costing $28.50 by itself. In other Apple news, Germany has demanded that the company "immediately make clear" what data it collects from customers, and what use it makes of that data (perhaps spurred by Google's Wi-Fi sniffing debacle).

6 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Interested to know... by jsveiga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It won't but it will change the refresh rate of the antenna signal strength meter so you won't notice the signal going down anymore.

    ...so when the call quality gets bad, you'll be able to blame the network, not Apple.

    ...and on the transmit side, the software will pump up more average power than what the network power control requests, so your battery life will get worse, and overall network (WCDMA) performance will be degraded for all users in the neighborhood.

  2. Re:Steve responds by Tisha_AH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes good old Stevie was claiming the problem was with the operators and demanded a modification of the UOS (user operating system).

    Sorry dude but it will be a few years before you can implant all of that Apple hardware directly into our brains.

    When I read his rather terse reply about "well, hold the phone differently" I was surprised. And this is from the company that made its riches by making hardware and software adapt to the users needs.

    Now it's like "the hell with you, we are omnipresent and omnipotent, you will bow down and kiss my ass".

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  3. Re:Interested to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And I suppose you have taken classes in waves & fields to justify your claimed expertise on this subject?

    The problem is, according to the theory, that the two antennae are short-circuited by your sweaty palm, resulting in a different overall antenna length, thus shifting its best frequency response to a different frequency than the one for which Apple tuned its reception.

    As such, both antennae are always in use, and if they are short-circuited, "temporarily cutting off the antenna not in use" is not only impossible but would not change the problem: the antennae are effectively one due to the short-circuit. Cutting one of them off wouldn't fix the short-circuit.

  4. Re:Interested to know... by Stick32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Easy... You get the icon to always display 3-5 bars. Then everyone can go back to blaming AT&T's network for dropped calls, as usual...

  5. Re:IOS == Cisco Internetworking Operating System by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I call name collision. Please refer to the iPhone/iPad operating system as something other than IOS because Cisco used it first.

    You're about a month behind. The complaint that's currently fashionable is the antenna issue. In about two weeks it's gonna move on to something else, so try to keep up.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. Re:Steve responds by mikael_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds to me like you cherry-picked the puck mouse example (also, this is a product from 1998 you're talking about).

    As for OS X, all my experience with it, previous versions of Mac OS, practically every desktop Windows version since 3.x and a boatload of X11 window managers (including but not limited to: PWM, FVWM1/2, Openstep, Enlightenment, Metacity, IceWM, 4DWM, Blackbox, Fluxbox...) tells me that it's better than most if not all of the competitors in many ways (although if you have a very specialized workflow then you may benefit from another UI but as a general desktop OS it's definitely one of the better and sure beats previous incarnations of Mac OS).

    Can't speak for the Time Capsule as I have never even seen one of those IRL but it does sound like you're confusing "shiny" with "easy to handle", the average user (the kind of person who would buy a turnkey backup unit like the Time Capsule) doesn't want extra cables and power bricks, they want something dead simple.

    Finally, the iPhone 4. Yeah, this does seem like a bit of an issue but for all we know they did usability research and found that only 0.003% of all users they tested it on actually held the phone in a way that shorted out the antenna. Still, does seem like a bad bug to let out in the open (but I'm not yet convinced they won't be able to fix it in software, there were a few other glitches with the iPhone 3G that had the anti-Apple crowd screaming "DEFECTIVE HARDWARE UNPOSSIBLE TO FIX IRREPARABLY BORKEN BUY A BLACKBERRY AND ZUNE INSTAED!!1" yet they were fixed in the 3.0.1 release of the OS).

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4