Do Scientists Understand the Public?
Mab_Mass writes "The American Academy of Arts & Sciences has an interesting article on the relationship between scientists and the public. [Here's the paper itself, as a PDF.] Rather than point the finger at an 'ignorant' public, this article chastises the scientists for a poor understanding of how to communicate with non-technical people. With a look at the issues of climate change, nuclear waste disposal, genetics, and the future of the Internet, the article provides examples of how the experts in these fields are failing to present their message in a way that encourages public discussion and support."
to find out if its true.
the experts in these fields are failing to present their message in a way that encourages public discussion and support
Isn't that what Slashdot is for?
and what's with this metric system. Why can't scientists use standard measurements like football fields, ping-pong balls, "around the Earth," and "to the moon and back," like our brilliant news media?
It's not really that simple. They construct models of the public, which can be disproven by counter-example, but never proven.
This approach is being questioned, however, as the scientific community is growing increasingly discontent with not getting laid.
Give all the scientists breast implants. The public will have no choice but to love them.
You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
From the article, "Republicans who are college graduates are considerably less likely to accept the scientific consensus on climate change than those who have received less education."
All I can say is, "Dang."
I find myself considerably less likely to accept the scientific consensus that there are Republicans who are college graduates.
I think I could probably explain SVD to a 6-year old. Of course, it would probably take 20 or so years...
I'm having a hard time figuring out how one would explain Special Relativity.
Have you tried using a car analogy?
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
So..*with* global warming we get NYC and DC flooded into oblivion?
I am trying but cannot see any negatives here...why again are we trying to stop global warming?
That was bit mean.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."