Ban On Photographing Near Gulf Oil Booms
boombaard writes "The day before yesterday CNN's Anderson Cooper reported that, from now on, there is a new rule in effect, which de facto bars photographers from coming within 65 feet of any deployed boom or response vessel around Deepwater Horizon (official announcement). The rule, announced by the US Coast Guard, forbids 'photographers and reporters and anyone else from coming within 65 feet of any response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches. In order to get closer, you have to get direct permission from the Coast Guard captain of the Port of New Orleans,' while 'violators could face a fine of $40,000 and Class D felony charges. What's even more extraordinary is that the Coast Guard tried to make the exclusion zone 300 feet, before scaling it back to 65 feet.'" Read below for the Coast Guard's statement on the new rule.
"The Coast Guard Captain of the Port of New Orleans has delegated authority to the Coast Guard Incident Commander in Houma to allow access to the safety zones placed around all Deepwater Horizon booming operations in Southeast Louisiana. The Coast Guard Incident Commander will ensure the safety of the members and equipment of the response before access is granted. The safety zone has been put in place to prevent vandalism to boom and to protect the members and equipment of the response effort by limiting access to, and through, deployed protective boom."
What's the problem? Not like anything interesting is going on around there.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
Obviously the Coast Guard, on the payroll of Big Oil, is trying to engage in a massive cover-up so no one can find out about this alleged "Oil Spill."
Coast Guard
Because we all can't be seamen!
I take from this that you don't live within 1000 miles of a body of water deep enough to float a rubber duckie.
Daily Kos is not a "news outlet". It's a partisan blog.
Well it started out that way, but clearly it has risen in stature to the point where it can now be compared to FoxNews in terms of reliability and integrity!
Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
Oil what?
I thought there was an agreement to refer to this as a "Whoopsie Daisy".
Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
What a crappy title. 65 feet ( 20m ) doesn't bar photography "near" a boom, it keeps idiots from bumping up against it. Unless photographers are using 1970 Instamatics, this should provide no obstacle to any serious photographer.
I beg to differ, I had planned to do a series of night shots of booms with a Holga and an LED flashlight. I insight my "right" to engage in dangerous night missions that may lead to equipment damage be respected!
Hey, some serious photographers use Holgas...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
That's very difficult to imagine - even Cthulhu has some principles.
Yeah, he's opposed to deep water drilling, for a start.
...is to file for copyright on millions of images and thousands of hours of video of oil spilled in the Gulf of Mexico. Followed shortly by hundreds of lawsuits against news agencies for copyright infringement.
I like the bit about being allowed to get close to the ground for landing. So considerate. Goverment press releases, they can't help but make you smile.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
"Oh no. Not again." - a bowl of petunias
Now if only we could figure out why the bowl of petunias said that? Anyway here's a LINK to CNN video where they compared this press censorship to when George Duh Bush blocked the press from documenting the Katrina flooding of New Orleans - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MC0NyinwQ6A#t=1m40s
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
It's not an oil spill. It's been renamed an "unplanned petroleum surplus."
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.