Slashdot Mirror


MeeGo, Zero To VT320 In Seventeen Seconds

muirhead writes "Installing MeeGo on an Eee PC 1000 netbook is quick, slick, and easy. The user interface is colorful and stylish with many quirky animations. MeeGo's features are easy to discover and it is fast and responsive. Underneath it all though there is still just a netbook. That means it's got a display screen that has no significant weight behind it. That means typing on an undersized keyboard that has no life. All of these undesirable features can, however, be fixed by adding 9kg (~20lbs) of VT320 video terminal."

150 comments

  1. Digital by deniable · · Score: 1

    At least they've used the 'Digital' icon right for once. For added value, he needs to install something like simh on the netbook and run a PDP emulator.

    1. Re:Digital by Kensai7 · · Score: 1

      Amazing. I never thought I would see it used (in the right way at least) again!

      --
      "Sum Ergo Cogito"
  2. news? by hjf · · Score: 4, Informative

    so this guy hooked up a terminal to a netbook. mad skillz.

    move along people, nothing to see here.

    1. Re:news? by blackpaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention he mistook a DB25 connector for a parallel port.

    2. Re:news? by blackpaw · · Score: 2

      And really, that the netbook is running meego is irrelevant, this can be done with any linux distro.

    3. Re:news? by c0lo · · Score: 1
      Hey, it is not everyday that en entire world can read (FTFA):

      I would like to thank Lightning Terminals for getting me a replacement keyboard so I could finish this article.

      when (at least, part of) his initial problem was:

      I am left typing on a undersized keyboard that has no life.

      But I do agree that the other part of it is surely solved

      I'm left facing a display screen that has no significant weight behind it

      Right... how to make a portable into a transportable.
      Or, you know, nothing beats a peer code review when the source code is presented on a listing (or punch cards) - at least the peer will be less inclined to criticise. The slight problem: keep the listing/punch cards from falling of your desk... you certainly need some weight there.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, many parallel ports from the 'good old days' were implemented with a db25 connection.

    5. Re:news? by BenFranske · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mod parent up, it's unfortunate that even reasonably skilled (compared to the general populous) computer users don't know that the type of communication is independent of the physical connector.

    6. Re:news? by BenFranske · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is this sad? What's wrong with implementing RS-232 on a 25 pin D-sub connector? In fact for real RS-232 support you need more than 9 pins and the 25 pin connector is really better suited. The fact that 9 pin connectors became the norm for RS-232 on PCs is the part that's more interesting.

    7. Re:news? by quenda · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, DB25 was standard for serial. the DB9 serial was an IBM oddity, as was the DB25 instead of Centronics for parallel. I guess it saved them a few bucks.
      However you just had to remember gender, Male DB25 was standard serial, and female was their non-standard parallel connector. Easy :-)

        The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from. - Andrew S. Tanenbaum

    8. Re:news? by andyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      DB9

      ITYM DE9.

    9. Re:news? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but let's face it - the same kind of story "On The Iphone" would be news. Hell, we've had stories which were basically "You can view this website On The Iphone".

      Of course, I'd rather that stories on Nokia's products (who are only the biggest seller in mobile phones and smartphones) were specifically on actual product news, given how rare coverage for them is. But still, I'd rather take a once in a blue moon story for MeeGo, than the usual three "Someone did something trivial On Their Iphone" stories we get every day.

      I'd also point out that it's interesting to know that MeeGo will run on things like netbooks, since I'd only heard it being planned for smartphones and tablets.

    10. Re:news? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I think if he made it a IP interface over serial and then used the DEC as a graphical terminal to the netbook that would be more interesting.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    11. Re:news? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's funny! My netbook has a video jack and three USB ports; plugging a monitor, mouse, and keyboard is beyond trivial; you could do it dead drunk.

      I don't have any problem at all seeing my Acer's screen, but then I have good eyes (well, one good one anyway; the cyborg eye I had the implant put in). The netbooks' keyboard is a little problematic, but USB keyboards are cheap.

      I plan on getting an S-Video adaptor to plug it into my TV, and can use my wireless mouse and keyboard from the couch. Honestly, my full sized PC is in the basement with the Hercules card and other obsolete parts; I haven't turned it on in a long time. Even with its lame keyboard I'd rather use my netbook than my work computer, which is woefully lacking in memory and has a slower CPU than the netbook.

    12. Re:news? by red_dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      However you just had to remember gender, Male DB25 was standard serial, and female was their non-standard parallel connector. Easy :-)

      But we're talking about RS-232 serial ports here, so in theory:

      • Male: DTE
      • Female: DCE

      But terminals are always DTEs even though they always seem to have a female connector so that the fragile pins are on the easily-replaceable cable; many non-PC computers follow the same logic. And then there are things like Cisco routers which are either DTE or DCE depending on the cable used or how it's attached.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    13. Re:news? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I think if he made it a IP interface over serial and then used the DEC as a graphical terminal to the netbook that would be more interesting.

      That would be interesting. Especially since TCP/IP is flatly impossible with an out-of-the-box serial terminal, such as a VT320.

      At best, it would have to be a lame-o casemod ("I have put this micro-ITX motherboard and an LCD display into the gutted case of a former VT320"). And that would render the matter uninteresting again.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    14. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A parallel port on a PC *is* a DB25 connector. DB25's were used for parallel AND serial ports.

      (Yes, I know what you meant.)

    15. Re:news? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Informative

      And don't forget DEC's version of the DB9 serial port, which was a bit earlier than IBM's and had a different pinout. So, if you have old DEC equipment with a DB9 that isn't talking to you, you may need a different cable than you expect.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    16. Re:news? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      That would be interesting. Especially since TCP/IP is flatly impossible with an out-of-the-box serial terminal, such as a VT320.

      Of course you are right.

      For some reason I thought this was an old unix machine and I forget how much things have changed. Long ago I actually wrote a /etc/termcap entry for a HP700/44. In the late 80's the company I worked for was importing the terminals and there was no support for them in Xenix. I wrote the termcap sent it back to SCO and they included it without even a thank you :-( of well I guess thats what I should of expected.

      I remember altering inittab files frequently do do this sort of thing, 300,1200 and 2400 baud modems. The bronze or iron age of computing perhaps?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    17. Re:news? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I still have a DB25 null modem in my toolkit - I just can't seem to throw it away.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    18. Re:news? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...actually, you can already ssh quite easily into a jailbroken iphone. The real danger there is reseting the default password so that everyone else can't.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    19. Re:news? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I always liked Vernor Vinge's concept of a "programmer-archaeologist", and his idea that the codebase of a starfaring trade civilization millenia in the future will still have components and artifacts dating back to Unix Version 1. MS Windows has received a lot of bad press in geekdom for perceived unnecessary legacy support ("holding it back and perpetuating old bugs and bad design decisions"), but Unix legacy support practically makes Microsoft a piker.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    20. Re:news? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I always liked Vernor Vinge's concept of a "programmer-archaeologist", and his idea that the codebase of a starfaring trade civilization millenia in the future will still have components and artifacts dating back to Unix Version 1.

      Is this where I make a joke about some pleasure model android thousands of years in the future not being able to ignore root commands?

      MS Windows has received a lot of bad press in geekdom for perceived unnecessary legacy support ("holding it back and perpetuating old bugs and bad design decisions"), but Unix legacy support practically makes Microsoft a piker.

      Again I agree with you but maybe this is a open vs closed source observation here.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  3. Hrmm by ahixon · · Score: 0

    Cool I guess, but why? Also interesting to note that the BIOS took the longest out of that entire boot process.

  4. Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by wandazulu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I rescued a Vax, complete with a VT320 from the garbage at work and while it all worked, I simply couldn't justify the electrical bill and the noise for a machine that had far less computing power than a Mac mini. So it finally met its end at the loading dock of an electronics recycling center.

    Thinking about the VT320 makes me feel old; I'm sitting in the computer room at the university, with its linoleum floor, coding away on a VT320 logged into an Ultrix machine, with my custom termcap that mapped the function keys to screen sessions, I felt like I was CODING. REAL. SOFTWARE. This was the BIG TIME. Nevermind that even vi slowed to a crawl when someone invoked the compiler. I wouldn't be surprised if the Meego was a slightly better machine than the Ultrix, performance-wise.

    Now get off my...aw, forget it.

    1. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by dcavanaugh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thinking about your post makes me feel even older. When I was in college the "new" terminals were VT-100. The lab was open 24 hours a day because there weren't enough terminals to go around. For those who knew where to look, there were a few VT-52s hiding in relative obscurity.

      Granted, the VAX had less power than a Mac mini, but it also had reliability that modern systems can't match.

    2. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Granted, the VAX had less power than a Mac mini, but it also had reliability that modern systems can't match.

      In my previous job we ran PDP 11/84s and 11/83s, VAX 11/750s and later various alphas. The PDPs running RSX11M had the greatest feeling of stability I have seen. You could get back to a system after a year and find it in exactly the same state you had left it. The architecture of RSX probably helped. Dynamic memory is discouraged. Many applications are effectively built into the kernel.

    3. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since we're feeling old, what I really miss about "those days" was the "communal" nature of a number of people all using the same machine at once. You were guaranteed that other folks would be logged in, and in pre-IM days a quick "talk" session with someone who knew C better than me solved many a tricky problem.

      Funny enough, I was "talk"-ing with someone I had not ever met face-to-face about how to solve some algorithm or something, and he said it would probably just be easier to write it down on paper. I agreed to meet him, and asked him which lab he was in; turned out he was sitting in the carel right in front of me!

      Good times. Good times.

    4. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      Thinking about your post makes me feel even older. When I was in college the "new" terminals were VT-100. The lab was open 24 hours a day because there weren't enough terminals to go around. For those who knew where to look, there were a few VT-52s hiding in relative obscurity.

      When I was in college the terminals hiding in relative obscurity were the decwriter hardcopy terminals. That is, they were ignored in a corner until someone started to use them. The noise turned out to be a good way of chasing at least one or two people from their VT-102s. (Also taught you 'ed', no fancy "visual" editing on a hardcopy terminal).

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    5. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by lxs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't feel old. According to Prince, both VAX and PDP machines are bound to make a comeback next year when the internet is obsolete.

    6. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I wouldn't be surprised if the Meego was a slightly better machine than the Ultrix, performance-wise.

      Slightly?

      Ultrix ran on a fairly wide range of hardware, but a typical machine would have a single MIPS CPU clocked at around 25MHz (i.e. 0.025 GHz). It probably would have about 32MB of RAM... the largest Ultrix server I ever used had 128MB, but that was far from typical. Many smaller DECstations that I used had only 16MB. The disk would be at most a 1GB SCSI-1 device. Workstations would more typically have a 200MB drive.

      A low-end netbook is probably going to have about 30x the CPU power, 16x the RAM, and several times the storage (except solid-state instead of an old slow hard drive)

      We really have an embarrassment of computational riches today.

    7. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      When I started university, the first time, the terminal was an ASR-33... 10cps tty... and a10cps paper tape punch. That or 80 col punch cards if you were using the mainframe. Of course there were machines you programmed by changing patch cords on circuit boards but they were starting to get old. And of course you didn't sort your data on a computer - you sorted it on a card sorter... made radix sorting very easy to understand :)

      The second time it was IBM Selectric terminals, some no-name crt terminals hooked up to a front end to IBM MFT to give text editing and job submission to the batch stream... and one Tek 4013 (iirc) storage tube terminal driven by an instance of APL. Oh yeah, good days!!!

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    8. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Awww fuckoff... I coded on punch cards, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    9. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Meh,

      My ADM-3a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM-3A) mumbles 'get off my lawn' in the general direction of your VT100.

      We had them hooked up to Intel Development systems, Gould SEL mainframes and some box or other than ran CP/M.

      The VT100s (and Wyse 120s) came later with the Vax 11/750.

      Funnily enough, a recycling company picked up some old WY120s from us a couple of weeks ago after we'd brought one of our veterinary clinics into the 21st Century and off an old THEOS multi-user system.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    10. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, we had one on a VAX 11/750 - great fun ensued one night when a faulty serial node on our coax network (something well obsolete called infaplugs) started to echo the login prompt, which was accepted by the 11/750 as the password - which resulted in the infaplug echoing that back etc. etc. and after a few duff logins the DECwriter started to print out intruder detection messages - it got through a whole box of listing paper overnight.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    11. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. IBM029. And whatever you do, don't drop the deck.

    12. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Your post makes me feel like a young whippersnapper. To me, vt100 is just a terminal emulation mode on minicom...

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    13. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Jees, you kids today. My first computer was a slide rule! ENIAC was patented about five years before I was born. I didn't grow up with computers, computers grew up with me.

      Should I invoke GOML? Now surely someone even more geezerly than me will chime in...

    14. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Shame you got rid of it, I'd like one of the larger noisier VAXen (I have a desktop size MicroVAX 3100). I don't run it all the time but I do take it to retro shows (complete with serial terminal) and use it as a file server for a network of Sinclair Spectrums. A larger VAX would be awesome.

    15. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel old too, but probably between you guys in age. I remember having X available on a few terminals, but in another room were a good amount of VT100 terminals. Even when those were full, I could always find a VT-52 languishing outside of a prof's office that wasn't used because people were not used to changing their TERM variable.

      Of course, the machine I was connecting to had less power than a decent Android device, and whose storage capacity was less than the 32GB memory card in the phone, but it was a different time back then.

    16. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by sconeu · · Score: 1

      My first terminal was a KP#26, you insensitive clod!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    17. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Bah!

      TV Typewriter!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_Typewriter

      Now get off my lawn unless you want to mow it.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    18. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a user interfaced that sucked big time...

      Now, *Multics*.....

    19. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how the GPs statement of "more stable than modern hardware" and the parent's statements about the "greatest feeling of stability I have seen" make any sense.

      Stable, by what metric? IOPS? MIPS? By neither of these measurements do the old systems hold up - only in "length of time running, untouched".

      Even then, it's not all that impressive by modern standards. How many people have Linux machines which have been left unattended for years on end - not just business machines in a back office, but millions of routers, cable modems, access points, and so on. There are many servers with similar characteristics, hidden away somewhere - I've seen FreeBSD and Linux machines serving the same role for as much as a decade without being touched by a human (or rebooted but maybe once or twice during that time by power outages and the like - 1800+ day uptime is incredible but not all that uncommon).

      Certainly people have heard the "old VAX bricked away behind an addition" story from years ago. I don't recall its origins but the basic idea is: old VAX served stuff up so reliably that it was forgotten, and they built it into the building. Well, I've seen this in a couple places myself, with modern stuff. In one, an embedded x86 router device (soekris) and DSL router got drywalled into the ceiling when an office was remodeled. This mistake was not found for several years, when the tenants moved out and another tenant (with a different service provider) needed to have things wired.

      Honestly, I "get" that machines used to be more reliable, in terms of "time left on uninterrupted", as a whole. But there are a lot more classes of computer now, and they're all millions of times more complex. Many are just as reliable, if not more so due to the improvements in manufacturing and material science.

      There are many things we make which have a due amount of deserved nostalgia - as it relates to their quality and performance (cars, handtools, woodworking, tools in general) - because we used to create these things stronger, simpler, etc. However, computing is not one of these things. I've got a half dozen computing devices in this house which can (and have) run for a year+ uninterrupted - and they are all commonplace and better than the old PDPs and VAX systems of old.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    20. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      A few examples of my definition of stabiity:

      • In FVWM with focus follows mouse, changes of focus are much faster. Focus changes don't seem to lag when system load increases.
      • When launching applications on my eeepc 701 the application startup time is more consistent than on other laptops which have hard disks. I put this down to SSDs having fewer variable which control read speed.
      • On the PDP 11s in question we ran a traffic signal application which controlled 120 traffic signals via 300 baud modems. Each modem had three LEDs TX, RX, and carrier. The modems updated on a regular cycle and we quickly got used to the way it looked. If something was wrong with communications the difference was quite apparent. But loading the system by copying files on disk made no difference to the LEDs. They just kept chugging away. This frequently continued for a year or so. Working with linux systems I don't always get the same feeling of consistency. The system occasionally stalls to update things. This is why linux has special purpose real time builds, and RSX is a real time system from the get go.

      These examples illustrate something about the way I (at least) interact with technology. Some things feel better engineered than others. They feel nice in the same way good food feels nice. Good technology has a feel. Thats all. Its hard to explain.

    21. Re:Sigh, I just threw out my VT320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG...this thread takes me back...I remember working as a student assistant at college when we got our VAX 11/750...VT-100 terminals...etc...man, I'm old :P

  5. We laugh at your puny VT320 by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's not hooking a classic terminal to a netbook. This is hooking a classic terminal to a netbook. (More pictures.)

    1. Re:We laugh at your puny VT320 by adolf · · Score: 1

      I was going to post something about my TI Silent 700, but there's no reason to do so now.

      Thanks for ruining everything.

  6. Security Breach in Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    He probably should change his login password now.

  7. DEC? Is that you? Alas, no. *sigh* by coaxial · · Score: 1

    I was all excited to see DEC back in the news. Oh how I missed you since that fateful day in 1998 when you got bought by Compaq, which inturn got bought by HP by the woman who now hopes to do for California and America, what she did for HP.

    But alas, no. You are gone and shall never return. I guess I'll just have to file your section next to Enlightenment's, and all the other sections that people have no idea what they're for. Can't someone over clock a a DEC Alpha or something?

    I'm really tempted to post some enlightenment news, but I wish it was something more than their most recent point release.

  8. Uses Lego Mindstorm by ojintoad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Connecting the video terminal to the netbook was fairly straight forward. Starting from the VT320 video terminal I used a Parallel to Serial Port converter plugged into the RS232 cable from a Lego Mindstorms set. The other end of Lego cable was plugged into a RS232 to USB adapter connected my netbook. (You could go straight for a Parallel to USB adapter cable, but I personally would not want to miss out on some excellent Lego.)

    What a blockhead.

    1. Re:Uses Lego Mindstorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can see the use of it. The Lego Mindstorm's is a null-modem cable, as for why they chose it to be is unknown to me, but hey, it means a DB9-DB9 null modem cable (female connectors on both ends, easy to connect to computer)

      However, calling a DB25-DB9 a "parallel to serial" converter....
      (Manual on the linked set for the VT320 talks about the 25 pin RS232 serial port, so I am really sure on that.)

  9. How about some graphics... by Zanthrox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll be impressed when I see a VT330 or VT340 showing a graphical web browser -- heck, you could go back as far as a VT125 to get monochrome graphics...Not that sending bitmaps over serial would be fun, but modern vector graphics might be..altered..to something ReGIS compatible. That'd be a cool hack.

    Neat to see a VT320 going again though, anyway -- been ages since I've seen one fired up.

    1. Re:How about some graphics... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Geez, I never had one that nice. Until about a year ago, I had a VT240 and a microVax on my desk, and used it daily.

                Brett

    2. Re:How about some graphics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried displaying sixel (~=bitmap) graphics on a VT330 or VT340? Even at 38400bps (the maximum those old terminals support) it takes an eternity to update the whole screen. I think it took me 20 minutes or so to display a Floyd/Steinberg dithered fullscreen photo. Too bad the power supply of my only VT330 caught fire an hour later, while I was away waiting for the second picture to display.

  10. I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

    Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

    There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

    1. Re:I'd just like to interject. by MightyMartian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Look Stallman. We've told you a hundred times, quit sleeping in the urinals. There's a perfectly good shelter down the street. Oh and do something about the body odor, unless you actually want to smell like someone who sleeps in a bathtub full of rotten egg yolks.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. One. Cares. Core tools are easily replaced. An operating system is not.

    3. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >Core tools are easily replaced.

      Then go for it, or start calling GNU/Linux by its proper name.

    4. Re:I'd just like to interject. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      No. One. Cares. Core tools are easily replaced. An operating system is not.

      At the risk of feeding the trolls...

      Yes, core tools are easily replaced, but usually they are NOT replaced - and when they are replaced, they are usually replaced with GNU tools, rather than vice versa. Writing a kernel is hard, but it would have been nigh on impossible without the GNU toolchain. And it WAS Stallman's GNU Public License that Linus chose as the license covering his then experimental OS kernel. So yes, RMS probably does deserve a little more credit than he gets for Linux. But then, so do hundreds, nay thousands, of other individuals who contributed.

      But do not expect me to call it "Guh-Noo slash Linux" and keep a straight face!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    5. Re:I'd just like to interject. by blackpaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you're referring to as Linux,

      Actually no, what I'm referring to is distro's as is quite clearly stated in my post in an attempt to forestall kneejerk Stallman pedantry. Obviously I failed.

    6. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use BSD tools, but why bother as the GNU ones are FREELY AVALIABLE TO USE and as such are FREELY USED by Linux. If Stallman didn't want his code to be FREELY USED without slapping GNU everywhere he shouldn't have made his code FREE TO USE without that condition.

    7. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe Stallman ever said "Call GNU/Linux GNU/Linux or you can't use it anymore," but one really should refer to GNU/Linux by its proper name, GNU/Linux.

    8. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then go for it

      A lot of embedded Linux distributions use Busybox. There is no requisite that a distribution use the GNU toolchain and utilities.

      or start calling GNU/Linux by its proper name.

      Even if this were technically the case in this instance (it's not) then why should you? You use GNU/Linux when exemplifying the importance of the GNU userland programs -- which is a situation that seldom occurs. Most people don't care what set of programs a Linux system is running with.

    9. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're forgetting one simple GNU/Fact - rms is GNU/God. He created the GNU/Heavens and the GNU/Earth!

    10. Re:I'd just like to interject. by the_womble · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually the proper name for what I use is:

      Mandriva GNU/Linux/xorg/KDE/Qt/Gtk

    11. Re:I'd just like to interject. by uglyduckling · · Score: 1, Insightful

      GNU/Linux is not its proper name, any more that Windows with Cygwin installed is called GNU/Windows. The OS is Linux, it always has been, the only person who wanted it called GNU/Linux is Stallman. In fact, there's probably more of X.org seen by the average end user than anything in the GNU toolchain, so maybe it should be called XOrg/Linux.

    12. Re:I'd just like to interject. by rishistar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is he also responsible for GNU/Metal?!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    13. Re:I'd just like to interject. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I don't think it needs to be called GNU/Linux either but Linux is not an operating system. Just saying Linux is perfectly reasonable short hand most of the time because those talkin about it either can make the distinction you are speaking about the operating system or platform from context or don't know enough about the subject to understand there is a difference between the kernel and an operating system.

      Operating systems manage resources and provide some method for the user to interact with the computer with a focus on loading and running other processes, and moving data; but not processing data. The kernel only manages resources.

      The name Windows for instance is alot more like calling GNU/Linux GNU than it is calling it Linux. If you apply the same reasoning that you call GNU/Linux to Windows you would call it Executive, or maybe NTKernel.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    14. Re:I'd just like to interject. by gparent · · Score: 1

      I like to call GNU/Linux by its proper name as well: Linux.

    15. Re:I'd just like to interject. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Actually no, what I'm referring to is distro's as is quite clearly stated in my post in an attempt to forestall kneejerk Stallman pedantry. Obviously I failed.

      Speaking of pedantry, "distro" is not a contaction. If it were a contraction, it would be distri' and not distro. And if it were a contraction, there would be an apostrophe whether it was singular or plural.
      </pedant>

    16. Re:I'd just like to interject. by uglyduckling · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To the vast majority of people, Linux is the OS, Linux Kernel is the Kernel, and most people are happy that there are many flavours to the OS, called distributions. The Stallman/Debian idea that "Debian GNU/Linux" is the OS and Linux is the kernel is a minority view.

    17. Re:I'd just like to interject. by stakovahflow · · Score: 1

      Off-topic, yes, but I just hope nobody wants to start calling out the BSD's for this p*ssing contest. I'd hate to see "GNU/FreeBSD" being thrown out there.

      EEEK!

      I like some of Stallman's work, but his attitude generally sucks! You kinda have to wonder...

      --
      Holy happy hippy crap!
    18. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      I think everytime we refer to Linux, we should really be calling it GNU/Linux/XOrg/KDE (or GNU/Linux/XOrg/Gnome if you prefer). I mean it's not a terribly useful desktop OS to the great unwashed without KDE or Gnome (or XFCE or Fluxbox or whatever).

      And anybody who calls it "GNU/Linux" without the XOrg and desktop environment hates freedom!

    19. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      contaction

      Pedantry fail.

    20. Re:I'd just like to interject. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Don't forget GNU/Coke!

    21. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you are troll but must point out to others why....

      GNU / Linux is not operating system but development platform. It is build by Linux operating system and GNU development tools.

      Linux is not microkernel, how much you, or RMS, would like it to be. It is a monolithic what is the original OS architecture. Kernel is the original name of the software what later started to be called as "operating system". Other names for that software among kernel and operating system was core, nucleos, master program and supervisor.

      The operating system is that portion of the software system what runs in kernel space or in supervisor mode.

      The operting system is responsible to control all the process, manage the memory, offer the networking, Input/Output, Filesystems and device drivers.

      Microkernel does only very small part of the operating system, while monolithic does all OS functions alone.

      And you are against yourself with same time. You are talking about GNU operating system but same time you are saying that GNU is not operating system because it needed a kernel. It is like you would be saying that Linux is part of GNU (that is something what RMS would LOVE TO SEE!).

      GNU is just a project, not a software! And GNU project has OWN operating system called HURD. HURD is server-client architecture operating system like Minix, NT, XNU and many other. HURD is not kernel, how much GNU fanatics like to call it (to protect the GNU/Linux propaganda). Because HURD is a Server-Client architecture, it has a microkernel. The microkernel in HURD is called GNU Mach. It is a derivation of the Mach. Mach 3.0 is btw microkernel used in XNU and many other Server-Client OS's.

      GNU developers are liers and fanatics who want to protect RMS's fantacy. They even have falsefied the standards what are based to computer science how computers work, not ethics, because they were against RMS's fantacies.

      Example, the uname is a program what prints by default operating system name. But gives operating system version, release and other infos as well. But GNU version of it got changed silently between many years so no one would not notice it. They added the non-standard -o option there and they changed "operating system" definition to be "kernel". But their added "-o" option shows the "operating system" what only prints out GNU/Linux. No other UNIX system use falsefied standard version of the uname. They print the real OS name when asked. They follow the technology standards how computer works, not how you or RMS likes to do it.

      And KDE SC has followed the standards more than GNU. KDE is group of people who cares about truth and facts and the computer science how it works. Even they know that Linux kernel is monolithic and so on it is operating system. If you dont trust, start the kinfocenter and check out.

      And other monolithic OS's are:

      SunOS (used in Solaris and OpenSolaris)
      FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD (FreeBSD has Server-Client architecture version called kFreeBSD)
      HP-UX

      There are lots of more.
      BSD was long time ago one OS. But it got forked three times (newest is dragon fly, what is server-client architectured) and all BSD OS's are different kinds.

      But then there is lots of Server-Client architectured OS's.

      NT (has microkernel)
      XNU (Mach microkernel)
      Minix
      kFreeBSD
      MkLinux (the base of the XNU)
      HURD
      Singularity
      L4

      etc etc

    22. Re:I'd just like to interject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just prooft yourself being a person who does not know what difference is between operating system and kernel.

      Just to give you hint. The monolithic kernel is not same thing as microkernel. The monolithic kernel is the first architecture for the operating system. Server-Client architecture is the second (or third, if layered was second) architecture and it changed the operating system functions so it could not anymore be called as kernel. After that the kernel name was abandoned meaning the operating system, and the operating system became the de-facto. After that the people have mistaken monolithic kernel being same thing as microkernel = just a kernel, OS being kernel + something else. While they have never understanded that the monolithic kernel has all the OS functions while microkernel has only the most important ones and all other is done by the servers (modules).

      The architecture between monolithic and server-client OS's are different, but the binary structure can be similar that they are multiple binary files.

      And NT is the operating system. It is not a kernel (unless you want to call it in same manner as OS was called as kernel in 60-70's). The NT has microkernel in it. If you do not trust, check NT architecture designers videos where they, as example, explains the singulartiy structure and compares it to NT itself how it has same way a microkernel but having better security.

      GNU software is meaningless for normal user. Linux is not. Linux rules all the hardware, all the software what can be ran. NONE of the GNU software does that because they are not part of the Linux OS.
      Xorg is even more important for normal user. But most important is the KDE SC or GNOME (LXDE, XFCE etc) and even more important are Firefox, OpenOffice.org, digiKam, Thunderbird, Banshee, Amarok etc.

      So we should call OS's with names of KDE SC and GNOME (GNOME IS PART OF GNU!).

  11. Um, any Linux distro? by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The pleasant surprise for me is that it was so simple to set up a thirty year old video terminal on a modern light weight host system. MeeGo has not forgotten its Unix heritage.

    Um, doesn't -every- Linux distro include this? I don't know of a single Linux distro with the exception of perhaps DSL and some embedded distros that wouldn't include basic command line tools. What do you expect with a Linux distro? That because your running Ubuntu all it does is boot a version of Windows XP in emulation via the Linux kernel?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Um, any Linux distro? by ranulf · · Score: 1
      Pretty much every unix variant too. I did this with my sparcs a good 15 years ago. It wasn't news then either, it was the standard way of connecting a text terminal.

      ObQuote: "Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it."

    2. Re:Um, any Linux distro? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      There are other lightweight systems that use the Linux kernel, but ignore GNU. We should be grateful that MeeGo is designed properly. Other real distros aren't marketed to consumers, whereas MeeGo devices will start appearing in stores soon. I'm looking forward to being able to buy devices that are immediately both usable and powerful.

      Even with Asus it was more like power on, overwrite their distro with Debian, mess around with drivers, start using the next day...

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    3. Re:Um, any Linux distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other lightweight systems that use the Linux kernel, but ignore GNU. We should be grateful that MeeGo is designed properly. Other real distros aren't marketed to consumers, whereas MeeGo devices will start appearing in stores soon. I'm looking forward to being able to buy devices that are immediately both usable and powerful.

      There's an OS out now that consumers have purchased plenty of, and they make phone calls. Alas, I forgot it's name - it's by a big search company whose search site is the same as their name. Bing? No, Microsoft owns that, and we don't "Microsoft it".

      Alas, I've fogtten the name of that OS. It supposedly competes against the iPhone. C3PO? R2D2? What was that line again? "These aren't the robots you're looking for?"

      Anyhow, it's got a completely non-GNU base, and its latest version was just released a couple of weeks ago...

  12. Terminals on an Apple IIGS by cbdougla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember borrowing an old Wyse terminal from work and hooking it up to my Apple IIGS running GNO/ME (GNO Multitasking Environment. Check here: http://www.hypermall.com/companies/procyon/gnome.html).

    It's kind of cool that all this still works in current-day Linux. There's not many dumb terminals around any more for sure unless you're using an IBM Mainframe I guess. I suspect they still use 3270's.

    1. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's not many dumb terminals around any more for sure

      The dumb terminals are the users these days, as demonstrated by this guy watkin5 who thinks it's such an incredible discovery that a Linux distro can handle a VT320 that he has to write an article about it (complete with a confusion between parallel and serial port DB25s that screams "I don't know what the heck I'm talking about but I'll talk about it anyway"), this other guy muirhead who think it's worthy of a Slashdot story and submits it, and kdawson who accepts the story.

      I guess in 15/20 years, we'll have a story on how Linux can still run keyboards and mice equipped with a PS2 plug originally invented by Sony...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's not many dumb terminals around any more for sure unless you're using an IBM Mainframe I guess. I suspect they still use 3270's.

      I guess I'm going to show my age here, but to me a VT320 is very far from a dumb terminal, having used a real glass tty (i.e. terminal that couldn't do e.g. cursor addressing, or even backspace).

      And the 3270 in particular is about as smart as a terminal ever got. The terminal itself did the input field text editing before shipping the whole screen input back to the mainframe. Even though there aren't many actual terminals around you'll still see them emulated on PCs in quite a number of applications.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    3. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by marqs · · Score: 1

      So what you say is that this will happen on Thursday the 7'th of April 2011?
      http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=15%2F20+years

    4. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by Silfax · · Score: 1

      And the 3270 in particular is about as smart as a terminal ever got. The terminal itself did the input field text editing before shipping the whole screen input back to the mainframe. Even though there aren't many actual terminals around you'll still see them emulated on PCs in quite a number of applications.

      They were damn near indestructible also. I have been a mainframer since the IBM360 days, and I still think the 3270's were the most comfortable keyboards to type on.

    5. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Linux is not just used on the desktop, it's pretty popular in the embedded world as well. Having to communicated with a single chip computer via a serial port is still a standard task in those setups.

    6. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There's not many dumb terminals around any more for sure unless you're using an IBM Mainframe

      I don't think we have any dumb terminals left, but they still have a big IBM mainframe. You log into it from your PC over the network using terminal emulation software.

    7. Re:Terminals on an Apple IIGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But It Has Electrolytes!

  13. Meh. Did that with an hp48 by caseih · · Score: 1

    I used to connect my HP 48 calculator to my linux machine via a serial port and used a terminal emulator on the 48 to log into the linux box and kill processes and stuff. Way more cool. And still portable!

  14. Re:Meh. Did that with an hp48 by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    So did you type

    -9
    [ENTER]
    process-name
    [ENTER]
    killall
    [ENTER]

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  15. We all have super computers now. by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    What most people don't realize is the machines most of us use every day are far more powerful than the Crays of the 80's. I think tomorrow I'll see if I can get the Lear-Seigler dumb terminal hooked up to on of my Linux machines. You will need a teletype to beat that!

    1. Re:We all have super computers now. by Barny · · Score: 1

      Guy above you beat it, he had a "steam punk" restored teletype machine hooked to a netbook.

      http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1710194&cid=32821368

      On a side note when I was in uni we hooked a Bordot teletype machine to a Motorola 68000 based machine via rs232, and built some assembler text editors to talk to them (wasn't too bad, just made a lookup table to convert from ASCII to Bordot).

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  16. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is coming from someone who used to have a dozen (or so) VT100 and VT220 terminals from various manufacturers running in his garage for a couple of years... why bother?

    1. Re:Why? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      If they were VT100's and VT220's, then they came from one manufacturer, DEC. There were knockoff's, of course, but they were usually given a slightly different part number. They were rarely exactly the same as a VT in terms of how they handled edge cases of escape sequences, which was a major source of problems when using their quirky varients.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Why? by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      One million instructions per what? The suspense is killing me!

  17. this is a story how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a story how?

  18. Poop dog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah baby!

  19. I log into machines over RS-232 daily. by mirix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    getty ain't going to be losing serial support anytime soon.

    But yes, serial console is awesome. Although not awesome enough to write an article about.

    People really need to learn that "D" subminiature connectors are not inherently serial or parallel. A DB-25 with RS-232 on it is still RS-232. Nothing parallel about it, apart from the fact that a lot of printer cards used the same connector.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:I log into machines over RS-232 daily. by deniable · · Score: 1

      I've seen DB25 used for for serial, parallel and SCSI. It gets around. Right now I'm trying to get thoughts of a DB25 parallel, 10Base2 network adapter out of my head.

    2. Re:I log into machines over RS-232 daily. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Not parallel (except in the sense as the original article's author's: "Any DB25 must be a parallel port")... but there's this. Old-sk00l Macintosh DB25 SCSI to 10Base2 or 10BaseT. I use one on my Mac SE for TCP/IP and Ethertalk on my LAN at home. It works quite well.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  20. Bah. by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 2, Funny

    A VT-100 should be plenty for anyone.

    1. Re:Bah. by Barny · · Score: 1

      A VT-100? LUXURY!

      We communicated with rock tablets, a chisel and a catapult!

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A VT-100 should be plenty for anyone

      ...and six of them should be plenty for Everyone!

    3. Re:Bah. by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      You had a chisel? We carved our messages with our PENIS! Kids these days, with their fancy tools...

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  21. Uh, yea... by HaeMaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guy calls a 25pin serial port "parallel" and is impressing us with is mad skillz using lego to "convert" it to 9 pin. The need for null-modem probably took him weeks to figure out.

    I think this kid should get off of my lawn.

    1. Re:Uh, yea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh Earl, you leave the poor kid be, he ain't hurting nothin', and you wouldn't'a' even known he was there but fer that kdawson feller raising a ruckus; he's the one yuh should be runnin' off. Want I should fetch yuh yer shotgun and some o' them rock-salt loads?

    2. Re:Uh, yea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Next up: 7eet Meego Hax0r runs ls and pipes output thru more.

    3. Re:Uh, yea... by makomk · · Score: 1

      The null modem cable is the Lego Mindstorms serial cable. (Yes, that's right, all original Lego Mindstorms kits included a null modem cable - it was used to connect up the IR transceiver tower.)

  22. heh by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    I remember doing something similar with a vt220 and dos back in the day. Now, what was the command to redirect console to the serial port? Something to do with con and pipes?
    copy con || com2:

    or something

    also some baud rate and Xon stuff.

    Anyway, the point being that my terminal had an amber phosphor and thus was far cooler than this guy's.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:heh by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      Add

      SHELL=C:\DOS\COMMAND.COM COM1

      to config.sys, plug in your terminal and reboot.

  23. Installation skillz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    His instructions are weird. You don't need ncurses to get a serial terminal working. serial port supporting getty (like agetty) is enough. and to activate changes in inittab you don't need to reboot your computer (it's not windows, you know..) just run "telinit q".

    1. Re:Installation skillz? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's interesting - I could repeat this with my Acer Aspire One netbook running fedora 13 and a Wyse 120 terminal then I could use it to ...er...um...well...maybe...

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  24. As Someone Who Worked On DEC PDP-11s... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    I can't claim to be a PDP-11 hero, I did a bit of programming and hardware faulting on them in the late 1980s in line with my jobs in telecoms and call centres, but the scary thing for me is realising the orders of magnitude of increased processing power that exists in a modern netbook than was in the DEC kit.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:As Someone Who Worked On DEC PDP-11s... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

      And where does all that power go? Seriously, where does it go? The address space of a PDP is 64K. That's it. It would be hard to do a "Hello World" in that space on the netbook.

    2. Re:As Someone Who Worked On DEC PDP-11s... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      I started off with computers in college (here in the UK) by assembly programming Z80 CPUs with LCD digit displays and probably no more than about 1K of memory - at the time we were amazed at what could be accomplished in that amount of memory...

      Of course, assembly programming has little interest these days because it just takes far too long to program anything in it and debugging is a pig - hence the need for programming languages, in-built libraries and layer upon layer of interfaces, APIs and whatever.

      And that's where your power goes! :-)

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  25. Thanks for the password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for giving us your password! (It requires slow motion and a bit of guessing to figure it out.)

  26. HOWTO by anti-NAT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Add the following to /etc/inittab

    # Serial tty in case console stuffs up
    s1:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -L -w 9600 ttyS0 vt100

    then

    telinit q

    and you're done. Now you too can have a vt100 plugged into your ttyS0 serial port (or an emulator via a null modem cable running at 9600bps, no parity, 8 bits, 1 stop bit, no flow control)

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  27. Ok guys, this is how to do it by deckardt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The sad guy mistook a db25 rs232 for a parallel port... sigh

    I've been doing this for years, since 1997... so this must be one of the oldest tricks in the book.
    Here is my 4 step recipe for Ubuntu, using USB serial adapters:

    1) hook up the stuff and config the terminals correctly (I used 9600 8n1 due to long cables, got weird chars at 19200+)
    2) Install Ubuntu on your system
    3) put the following in /etc/init/ttyUSB0.conf
    # ttyUSB0 - getty
    #
    # This service maintains a getty on tty1 from the point the system is
    # started until it is shut down again.

    #start on stopped rc RUNLEVEL=[2345]
    #stop on runlevel [!2345]

    respawn
    exec /sbin/getty -8 9600 ttyUSB0 vt100
    ---(repeat for as many terminals you have, incrementing the 0 of ttyUSB0 to 1 to 2 etc)---
    4a) reboot
      or
    4b) sudo service ttyUSB0 start
    (repeat for as many terminals you have, incrementing 0 to 1 to 2 etc) ...
    *) profit

    Here is my setup with a WYSE vt420 compatible and two vt320's
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/rickdeckardt/4748415699/

    Gee wiz, that was easy... So why is this on the frontpage of slashdot?

  28. I don't really understand by Rhaban · · Score: 1

    Could you clarify you point by using a FUEL/Car analogy?

    1. Re:I don't really understand by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      Yup!

      I run my car on Pirelli tires, and it's nigh impossible to drive a car properly without tires (just like you can't have a kernel without GNU). Therefore, I should really be referring to my car as a Pirelli/Mazda.

  29. VAX was about 1 MIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, a VAX had 1Mb of memory and about 1Mip of processing power, compared to todays top of the range processors (160,000 MIPS for a Core i7).

    My office desktop machine (the one I'm typing on now) has 16GB of RAM, i.e. 16000 times more ram, Quad Xeon processors, that's half a million times more processing power.

    My MOBILE PHONE, has 512 x the RAM and about 30,000 times the MIPS even.

    Yet some how I'm typing in text at 12 words a minute, not dissimilar to typing on JANET via a terminal.

  30. Netbook OS by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    I like the whole idea of putting linux on the netbook I think it helps keep cost down. Plus some Linux distro's like Ubuntu have a netbook version that are very light weight and easy to use. The distro he is using is command line driven does not get more light weight then that.

  31. Cards and Teletype model 37 by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 1

    Nah, you should program using cards (9-edge down of course) or UNIX's first character terminal (the teletype 37) to get a true retro feeling. Programming in cards where you submitted the deck to the attendents for processing, and sometime later picked your output, tended to make you check the program by hand before submitting, particularly if you didn't get the output back until the next day. I remember in my first high school having the 029 or 027 card punch in the next room to the computer, made it so convenient for doing those last minute changes (though in a pinch, tape and a portable hole punch would do), while my second high school had the 24-hour turn around.

  32. Byte8406 anyone ? by andycal · · Score: 1

    This whole discussion has overtones of byte8406. But this does get me thinking, if tech employees are considered old at 40, how much more common will the "I never saw a 25 pin rs232 port" type of mistake be in the future?

  33. Serial TTY is still a nice feature. by Spit · · Score: 1

    A long time ago I had a handmedown 386 I used to run Debian 1.3 on. At the time I was pretty poor and I didn't have a VGA display, so I used to borrow one from a friend when I needed one like for install or when I trashed it. The rest of the time I used a c64 running Novaterm with a mono display for clarity, worked great.

    The 386 is long gone but the c64 still comes in handy.

    --
    POKE 36879,8
  34. Not any Linux distro suitable for smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think the other distros in Meego's space (Android and ChromeOS) include ncurses or VTs. I could be very wrong, though.

  35. Where's the GUI output as ReGIS/Sixel graphics? by swb · · Score: 1

    That's when you've got something impressive. Text-mode output to a terminal isn't really that interesting.

    1. Re:Where's the GUI output as ReGIS/Sixel graphics? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      That gives you what, a 160 X 72 display? I'd like to see a xterm runing on a VT240. Maybe try it in an emulator sometime?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Where's the GUI output as ReGIS/Sixel graphics? by swb · · Score: 1

      According to the VT340 manual (yeah, I know, OP has a VT320...), 800x480 for ReGIS graphics. Sixel is probably less.

  36. VAX, PDP, rock solid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Best config of them all, MicroVAX 4000, VMS 5.5-2, DecNET Phase IV. Back in the 90s I used to set up a boxen for customers. When checking back years later, it wasn't unusual to find them still up and running from the point of initial setup.

    My weirdest client of them all still runs a Micro PDP-11 based comms system 24/7/365 with no downtime.

    Just so you kids know.

  37. The just don't build 'em like they used to by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    Now get it up on a Telex 33-ASR and I'll be really impressed.

    1. Re:The just don't build 'em like they used to by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 1

      Some time ago (probably 8-10 years ago), I noticed that getty lost the ability to automatically do stty -iuclc -olcuc if you logged in with a username all in caps, like the original UNIX getty used to do, and bash lost mapping ^ into |, both of which are needed to use an ASR-33 on a UNIX type system. I did use UNIX V6 on an ASR-33 for a bit in the 1970's.

    2. Re:The just don't build 'em like they used to by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the version of Unix nor the exact hardware it ran on, at this point, but I, too, was connected to a mini through a Model 33 in the early '70s. Fortran IV was what we ran at the time.

  38. You disappoint me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it finally met its end at the loading dock of an electronics recycling center.

    The proper way for an old VAX to meet its end is out in a field, at the receiving end of a couple dozen 12 gauge slugs fired at it.

    Son, I am disappoint.

  39. VAX 780 was 1 MIP by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 1

    In terms of MIPS (meaningless indicator of processor speed), the Vax 780 was the gold standard for benchmarks. As such, it became the measurement all of the super-minis measured themselves against, and the general concensus was it a 1MIP machine. Of course later VAXes came in at different speed/price points.

  40. Re:first post! by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    first post!

    So?

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  41. Got this beat by EriktheGreen · · Score: 1

    I remember sitting in our college computer lab watching one of my fellow students (who was a bit more advanced than me) start up the first version of Linux that would boot off of floppies... boot and root disk, no installer, no hard disk device driver either. It had a serial terminal emulation and some basic network capabilities, so we connected a telnet session from it to a 300 bps decwriter terminal nearby and chatted back and forth for a bit. For those not familiar with the Decwriter, it was a slowish bidirectional dot matrix printer connected to a tty keyboard... one of those terminals for which the early line based editors were state of the art, because they could print a line at a time.

    This article is pretty much pointless... I suppose all it does is underscore how skills that used to be mainstream (every computer person knew how to connect a terminal, or they didn't connect) are now "special"... I wonder if the guy who did this is one of the kids whose parents always told him he was a winner and gave him a trophy even if he lost?

    If you want to really impress me, find a way to create/modify a netbook so it has a real, usable keyboard that others can build. Improve the product, don't just connect old hard to find hardware to it for the sake of nostalgia.

  42. What I'm wondering is why you're so against it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I'm wondering is why you're so against it. Does it stop your BSD working? Does it stop Debian running? What's the problem? Why do you care?

    THAT is the attitude that generally sucks. And I kinda have to wonder...

  43. Takes me back - teletypes by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    For entertainment for the kids, I once built a teletype - 5 bit baudot code - interface to an early Commodore computer (kind of homage to the Manchester computer.) It was so noisy that my wife exiled it to the furthest point of our granny annexe, and it was still too loud. The hardest parts were (a)programming the stunts to switch the code converter and (b) the +/-75V translator.

    Those were the days when we discovered that our military grade Eprom programmer was actually an embedded PDP-8 and you could run code on it.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  44. done that by Eil · · Score: 1

    I did the same thing 5 years ago. I wanted a persistent IRC terminal next to my workstation because I was way to cool to just have an XChat window open all the time.

    I put it together out of a Wyse 160 terminal that I pulled out of a dumpster (the box had never been opened so it was effectively brand-new) and a Pentium 90 netbook-like computer that someone gave me.