Slashdot Mirror


OnLive Latency Tested

The Digital Foundry blog has done an analysis of recently launched cloud gaming service OnLive, measuring latency across several different games. Quoting: "In a best-case scenario, we counted 10 frames delay between button and response on-screen, giving a 150ms latency once the display's contribution to the measurement was removed. Unreal Tournament III worked pretty well in sustaining that response during gameplay. However, other tests were not so consistent, with DiRT 2 weighing in at 167ms-200ms while Assassin's Creed II operated at a wide range of between 150ms-216ms. ... OnLive says that the system works within 1000 miles of its datacenters on any broadband connection and recommends 5mbps or better. We gave OnLive the best possible ISP service we could find: Verizon FiOS, offering a direct fiber optic connection to the home. Latency was also reduced still further simply due to the masses of bandwidth FiOS offers compared to bog standard ADSL: in our case, 25mbps."

1 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Re:And that means...? by Krneki · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is bad, because we are talking about input lag, not response lag. And while it might be OK for Joe the console player, but it is unacceptable for competitive PC players, who tweak every single input device in order to lover lag.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.