Apple Censors Consumer Report iPhone4 Discussions
An anonymous reader writes "Apple has done it again. All threads about Consumer Report's iPhone4 non-recommendation are removed or deleted.
If it happened once, maybe you'd say it was a glitch. But what if it happened twice? Three times? Four times, five, six?"
If it happened once, maybe you'd say it was a glitch. But what if it happened twice? Three times? Four times, five, six?
Keep it up until your 32,768th post when they'll regret using a signed short int for the NUM_POSTS_CENSORED value in your forum profile.
My work here is dung.
Yeh, when Jobs said his control over every Apple-user's computing was about "freedom from porn", we could have guessed that "porn" was just being dragged up as a convenient excuse.
Expert in software patents or patent law? Contribute to the ESP wiki!
Well, that is what you do with bad apples, isn't it?
Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
Really you just paid $299 for your phone. You pay goodness knows how much a month for your 2 GB capped data plan. Just suck it up and buy the $30 bumper! what is the big deal!
(This message was sent from my Android phone on the Sprint network).
See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
Touche.
The price is always right if someone else is paying.
No... they're posting it wrong.
help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am
If someone says something, and you remove it, that's censorship.
No, it's not.
Censorship is:
: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable ; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable
There are plenty of discussions about this issue on the Apple support boards which are not being removed.
The multiple posts about an external magazine review have been removed because discussing magazine articles is offtopic for a tech support board, just as discussing the latest Huffington Post article on Angelina Jolie is offtopic.
This seems like a power play to provide more relevance to Consumer's Union than a specific attack on Apple. I am by no means an Apple fan but this issue seems potentially overstated.
Absolutely overstated! I mean, who really wants their phone to actually BEHAVE as a phone! Insanity, I tell you, insanity!
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
"I'm sorry, sir, but you have violated the Terms of Service of this call by referring to an external site. I will have to censor you for the remainder of our conversation. Is there anything else I can assist you with today? ...Sir, by your silence I must conclude that I have resolved the issue. I went ahead and filled out a comment about how happy you are with our product on the Consumer Reports website. Thank you, and please remember that the new season of Glee is available on the iStore for $31.99."
Found it
Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
You spelt touchy wrong
I dunno. Ballmer might whip out his Zune and try to squirt the tykes.
Although, I would make sure all the chairs are properly secured before-hand..
The real news here is that they actually paid attention to something that was said in their support forums. :-p
You don't like your kids much, do you?