Slashdot Mirror


Apple Censors Consumer Report iPhone4 Discussions

An anonymous reader writes "Apple has done it again. All threads about Consumer Report's iPhone4 non-recommendation are removed or deleted. If it happened once, maybe you'd say it was a glitch. But what if it happened twice? Three times? Four times, five, six?"

10 of 588 comments (clear)

  1. Apple fanbois will love it by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will be an "advantage" over Android, that the forums are not cluttered with unnecessary information.

  2. Apple is About Freedom! by CritterNYC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple is about freedom. Freedom from porn. Freedom from criticism. Freedom from competition. Freedom from objective discussions. Freedom from the truth.

    Apple little world is looking more like 1984 every day.

  3. Re:To think that this is the company..... by khendron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They never said that 2010 wouldn't be like 1984.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  4. Re:Zapp Brannigan's Reporting Strategy by biryokumaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If someone says something, and you remove it, that's censorship. I'm not saying Apple isn't within their rights to censor their own website, but there's no question that it is censorship.

    Think different indeed.

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  5. Re:Zapp Brannigan's Reporting Strategy by urulokion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're right in that Apple is free to moderate their boards however they wish. But you are missing the point. Image is very important to Apple. They are trying to keep "the Image" intact. But ultimately Apple is tarnishing "the Image". They are trying to control information in a very Orwellian way (i.e. "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength."). And what makes it very damning and hugely ironic, is that Apple is turning into the very thing they fought against in their very first Macintosh Commercial.

  6. Re:Zapp Brannigan's Reporting Strategy by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That depends on the circumstances. If you invite people to draw on your car, then restrict what they are allowed to draw, then yes, it is censorship. Apple runs a forum for its users, but removes critical threads from that forum -- how that is anything but censorship is a mystery to me.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  7. Re:It is their site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are right up there with Microsoft on the evil scale.

    Compared to Apple, I'd let Microsoft watch my children.

  8. Re:Zapp Brannigan's Reporting Strategy by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree as long as that person has innocent intent. Consumer Reports clearly created this article to sell copies rather than push factual information. Also, the reality is that a good amount of this type of "information" that was on the newsgroups was being put there by marketing firms who are being paid to push a certain agenda. The article "Is the Iphone 4 Apple's Vista" comes to mind here...

    Lets cut to the chase... If Apple is so concerned about negative information on the iPhone 4, do you honestly think that there would be a 3 week lead time on shipping the of the phone? No, they would not. Also, the antenna issue is completely overblown, and I am sure Consumer Reports knows this internally...

    Wow that must be great Kool-Aid. Clearly, a review that essentially says "We love this phone, but we can't recommend it until Apple fixes it so it can actually make phone calls." can only be a slanted hack-job to drive up circulation. Other than that one important detail, they all but gush over the greatness of the iPhone4. At this point, can you even remember what it was like to have a relationship with reality?

    Cue the obligatory Penny Arcade "I'm the guy who gives hand jobs to Steve Jobs" strip. Seriously.

  9. Re:Zapp Brannigan's Reporting Strategy by kg8484 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has no right to censor people for speaking their minds under these circumstances.

    Actually, it is well within it's rights to censor people posting on its bulletin board. Now, if Apple tries to get a restraining order against Consumer Reports or against people posting on Slashdot, then no, it is not within its rights. Again, I repeat, Apple is 100% within its rights to censor people posting on its forum. Doesn't mean it isn't unfair in some way, but still within it's rights.

  10. Re:Look it up by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The multiple posts about an external magazine review have been removed because discussing magazine articles is offtopic for a tech support board, just as discussing the latest Huffington Post article on Angelina Jolie is offtopic.

    So, a magazine article about the iPhone is off-topic in a tech support board dedicated to the iPhone?

    Are you saying this with a straight face?

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.