Slashdot Mirror
Man Claims 84% of Facebook, Gets Order Blocking Assets
Cyrus writes "According to a Bloomberg scoop, a New York man claiming to own a majority of Facebook has gotten a signed court order to block Facebook from transferring assets."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
given the "issues" Z-man has, one may wonder how many of these skeletons are in his closet? A bent sapling never grows straight.
Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
So I am guessing you were also a CS major?
I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
Regardless of whether or not the guy wins some money in the lawsuit, nothing will change. Zuckerberg might be slightly less rich. But he will still be rich, and an asshole. Facebook will still suck.
My other sig is clever.
yes, there is no bigger pile of crap then a social media site that has made it easy for me to get in touch with family and friends, stay up to date in their lives.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
No matter how big an jerk you may think Zuckerberg is, and no matter how bad you may think Facebook is, it is practically always possible to get worse.
Not knowing anything that I didn't learn in the last 5 minutes, upon seeing this article, this Ceglia guy certainly has a running start on both. The enemy of your enemy may not be your friend - just a different enemy.
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
stay up to date in their lives.
Your brother has found a pig in Generic Farmville Clone. Do you want to help him feed it? Click here.
Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
No offense, but 10 years ago, everything you wrote was being said about instant messaging, and before that, about email. [Citation needed], but I wouldn't be surprised if the same applied to telephones. So while I actually agree that Facebook is pretty grating and annoying, the arguments above are just the new "Get off my lawn".
I can only speak for myself, of course, but I guess a lot of people who want this to happen (I am one of them) does so because of Zuckerberg rather than Facebook. Humans are naturally drawn towards justice and fairness, and see Zuckerberg as a person who denigrates his customers, abuses their privacy and takes advantage of their personal data - and always, ALWAYS pushes the boundaries of what Facebook is allowe3d to do and only retreats after a big community backlash. And so, people feel Zuckerberg does not deserve the fortune he has.
Facebook could, otherwise, be a useful and safe tool, in the hands of an ethical leadership.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
Maybe you shouldn't use Facebook then, and let the millions of other people who actually do enjoy using it, use it.
I predict a novel legal theory being invented that will protect the big corporation from a seemingly straightforward contract.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
So basically you are saying since you don't think Facebook is the most effective way to communicate, nobody else should either.
"But this one goes to 11!"
M.U.L.E. 0WNZ all your crappy newfangled web games and always will.
since the beginning of time.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff