Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

More Gas Station Credit-Card Skimmers

Posted by kdawson on from the look-for-the-guy-with-the-blue-tooth dept.

coondoggie notes a Network World piece on credit-card skimmers found installed in gas pumps, this time in Florida. Like the similar wave of attacks in Utah earlier this year, the latest crop uses Bluetooth to transmit the illicitly collected data. Does this mean an accomplice has to hang around within 3m of the pump? "The Secret Service has indicated there's a crime wave throughout the Southeast involving the gas-station pump card skimmers, and it may be traced back to a single gang that may be working out of Miami... St. Johns County in Florida has also been hit by the gas-pump card skimmers. [A local sheriff's department spokesman] says criminals wanting to hide the credit-card skimmers in gas pumps have to have a key to the pump, but in some cases a single key will serve to get into many gas pumps." Here's an insight from the banking industry on the skimming fraud.

4 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. ATM Skimmer by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed that my bank has introduced new ATM's to combat skimming. The card reader now has flashing lights, and the display shows a picture of what the card reader should look like.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:ATM Skimmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is not new in Europe. Every ATM now has it. Also sine 3-4 years ago all cards have a chip in them. The transaction is authorized by the chip in a real-time two way communication, and you have to punch in the pin code. But that is never going to happen here in US, primary because it means no tips. But why bug gas stations - just go work as a waiter, or at any cash register desk and just routinely slide the card through a second reader. In EU the waiter at a restaurant has to bring the POS terminal to your table. You insert the card into the slot, while the card is in the slot the waiter puts in the amount, you check it, decide to tip or not, put the amount of tip in, then dial your pin code. Then the chip on the card already connected with the bank of the POS terminal starts to make the transaction, the bank proxies that transaction to your bank, the chip on the card talks with your bank, and it's done, money are wired from you account to the merchant account. Plain and simple, and in no more than 10 seconds you get an SMS on your cell phone - hey - merchant XXX, pos terminal ID YYY just withdrew 20 euro from your card ending in ..... If it's not you, you pick up the phone, call your bank and just tell them it is not you. And that's it.. the merchant cannot change the amount you were billed at a later time. Here in US you have to wait up to 5 days to have it posted and it could get changed a lot (usually because of the tips).

      You have to decide whether you want a convenience of just waving your card in front of a cash register, or you want the security of actually allowing the transfer of funds from your account. As for the banks - it will always be easier and more profitable to have the people loose their money and go into debt. That is why only a strong government regulation can make them change something. On a little bit of side not - in Europe if you don;t have enough funds in your card the transaction is refused and no penalty is payed. Here, because of the delay in posting transactions you could easily overdraw your card, and get charged 50 for each transfer after the limit.

      So.. decide.. convenience or security.

  2. insight from the banking industry by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting that this "insight from the banking industry" doesn't seem to indicate the banks have any responsibility for the problem.

    There once was a time that people took their money to the bank for safekeeping. I think banks have partly weaseled themselves out of the security side of the business, and what used to be called "bank robbery" they now call "identity theft." Which works ok for the bank, seeing how it's the customer who lost the money and it must have been the customer's fault, or the gas station's, or the POS equipment vendor's.

    The bank, which should act like a watchdog, portrays itself as something of an innocent bystander.

  3. Re:Get the chip by Insightfill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...the various issuing institutions, at least in Britain, have tried to use this to argue that theft/skimming losses should now be the fault of the "negligent" customer, rather than their problem.

    Yes, Slashdot covered a similar case a few years ago. "Stolen car!? That's impossible with our current state-of-the-art RFID keys! You must have negligently left your keys where someone could take them; no insurance for you!"