Slashdot Mirror


Privacy Flaws In Chatroulette Expose Users

itwbennett writes "In a paper posted online this week, researchers from the University of Colorado at Boulder and McGill University outline three different types of attacks that could be launched against Chatroulette users. While the new research doesn't expose any gaping privacy holes, it does show how the service could be misused by determined criminals. For example, the researchers were able to use IP-mapping services to get a general idea of users' location (a public Web site, called Chatroulettemap.com already does this). Then by searching Facebook using information obtained in chats and comparing pictures, researchers were able to identify chatters. 'Even in a city as big as Chicago, you can drill down and find the person you're actually talking to,' said Richard Han, an associate professor with the University of Colorado who co-authored the paper."

101 comments

  1. No No No No No by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Privacy Flaws In Chatroulette Expose Users

    Trust me, on Chatroulette it's the users that have been exposing themselves.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:No No No No No by jmerlin · · Score: 5, Funny

      This brings a whole new meaning to the word "gaping privacy holes."

    2. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, on Chatroulette it's the users that have been exposing themselves.

      That's true in most places, yes. According to the article, the issue is only known to occur in Soviet Russia.

    3. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hehe he said "drill down" hehe.

    4. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was visiting a friend of mine in San Fran a few months ago. He got a new Apple laptop, so he was showing it to me. We tried out Chatroulette briefly, and the third session ended up being a close-up of some guy touching his penis. The first thing my friend wrote was "Jim, is that you? It's Freddy."

      My friend recognized the other guy by his penis. Turns out they knew each other from a gym they both went to, where they'd seen other naked in the showers. They both thought it was a really funny coincidence to meet on Chatroulette like that.

    5. Re:No No No No No by funaho · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Trust me, on Chatroulette it's the users that have been exposing themselves.

      This is exactly the thought that came into my head after reading the headline.

    6. Re:No No No No No by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mr. Goatse hasn't been seen on /. in YEARS...

      --

      eTrade SUCKS
    7. Re:No No No No No by vxice · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm guessing they cross reference the video of your genitals to the picture of your genitals on adultfriendfinder.com for a start on identifying person.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    8. Re:No No No No No by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if they're gay which would give you an excuse for recognizing another man's penis, that's disturbing in many ways.

    9. Re:No No No No No by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      In other news, ChatRoulette is looking for a new name. Some of the top contenders are:

      BouncyPenis
      FindAFap
      PervertLottery

      And...

      INeverKnewYouCouldDoThatWithAHamster

      Goatse and Tubgirl are also falling from fame as lolcatz and trolls everywhere now just link to ChatRoulette. More after we come back from commercial.

      --
      ~X~
    10. Re:No No No No No by maxume · · Score: 1

      As if any of the pics on adult friend finder are real.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:No No No No No by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Exactly... In true FTFY form:

      Even in a city as big as Chicago, you can drill down and find the penis you're actually looking at

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    12. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it was in goatkcd
      I still have nightmare about this

    13. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the thought that came into my head after reading the headline.

      Me too, because I read the "from the users-exposed-themselves-just-fine dept." byline.

    14. Re:No No No No No by spazdor · · Score: 1

      As if there are any women on that site at all except for the ones whose photos they paid to use.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    15. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if they paid any women at all for those photos.

    16. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a creepy stalker guy, I can verify that some of them are real.

    17. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got a new Apple laptop...

      Even if they're gay...

      Was there even really any question about that?

    18. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... in Soviet Russia, penis exposes you?

    19. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well played, good sir!

    20. Re:No No No No No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you expose them in public (and the Internet is in public) then the those are no longer your 'private', but instead they are your 'public' holes. There are quite a few.

    21. Re:No No No No No by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

      Fred: Hey Jim! Long time no see! Remember me from gym class?
      Jim: Hmmm... no, I don't recall. What do you look like?
      Fred: *unzips pants and lets the snake loose*
      Jim: Ah, Fred! I remember now, it's good to see you again.

    22. Re:No No No No No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You believed that line???

      Given the differences between a flaccid penis and an erect one, your friend had exposure to that penis erect. This exposure may have been in the showers, but wasn't likely from showering.

    23. Re:No No No No No by wtfmang! · · Score: 0

      that was clearly a troll, plz refrain from posting on slashdot for 30 days for failing to notice this fact.

    24. Re:No No No No No by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And if that wasn't enough, also staring at you; in anitcipation...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  2. Won't work all the time... by Bryansix · · Score: 5, Funny

    For one simple reason. Facebook does not let you set your profile picture to a shot of your genitals.

    1. Re:Won't work all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's about a banana and 2 kiwi's?

    2. Re:Won't work all the time... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe not, but facebook does let you search by email addresses!

    3. Re:Won't work all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I does however let someone change your account profile picture to goatse.

      Trust me my brother never should have messed with the it geek :)

  3. This is news? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1, Funny

    So the security flaw is that by asking someone for personal information you can obtain personal information about them? This is called social engineering (or maybe just talking).

    Not sure what you'd do with this anyway, go meet that masturbator you saw online?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:This is news? by socz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why make it so complicated and give it a fancy name? Here's the summed up version: "ASL?" What else do I need to know?

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    2. Re:This is news? by Haffner · · Score: 2, Funny

      In another paper posted online this week from the University of Colorado at Boulder, my hand hurts when I poke it with something sharp.

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
  4. For those not stupid enough to know: by Saysys · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Chatroulette is a website that pairs random strangers from around the world together for webcam-based conversations. Visitors to the website randomly begin an online chat (video, audio and text) with another visitor. At any point, either user may leave the current chat by initiating another random connection. As of July 11 the site is offering an experimental "localized" version which pairs people by state". -wikipedia

    So 1.) people find each-other intentional and 2.) "using information obtained in chats" I can get you SSN... if you tell me.

    Literal nothing worthy of note in this research folks... move on.

    1. Re:For those not stupid enough to know: by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you RTFS, it's more along the line of combining the IP address of the other party, and the picture to narrow down who/where.

      I think they are missing the bigger flaw here. Flash, or even worse, peer-to-peer flash...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:For those not stupid enough to know: by Restil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can always sniff out the ip address of the host I'm communicating with, even if all of the data is encrypted. The only way to prevent that is to run all of the data (video, audio, and text) through a central server (or multiple central servers) or some type of proxy. The point is, someone is going to have to pay for a huge amount of bandwidth, as opposed to the way it works now where all the main server has to do is arrange the connections.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    3. Re:For those not stupid enough to know: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are missing the bigger flaw here. Flash, or even worse, peer-to-peer flash...

      From what I understand, there's already quite a bit of Flashing going on. And yes, it's mostly guys showing their pee-ers.

    4. Re:For those not stupid enough to know: by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      And yes, it's mostly guys showing their pee-ers.

      So you're saying it's a Pee-er to Pee-er network?

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  5. Question about chatroulette by Pojut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone ever used it and engaged in an interesting conversation with a person who became a regular point of contact? Or is it all just penises and overweight bald guys?

    1. Re:Question about chatroulette by nozzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah I did but all he wanted to talk about was penises and overweight bald guys so I stopped it.

    2. Re:Question about chatroulette by decipher_saint · · Score: 0

      Everyone on the 'net is either a dick or an overweight bald guy. Chatroulette just exposes this fact.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Question about chatroulette by Restil · · Score: 1

      There's always Merton. And Ben Folds imitating him. But otherwise, you're pretty spot-on.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    4. Re:Question about chatroulette by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Has anyone ever used it and engaged in an interesting conversation with a person who became a regular point of contact? Or is it all just penises and overweight bald guys?

      Who says it can't be both?

    5. Re:Question about chatroulette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No regular point of contact, but I have had interesting conversations with some people the 2-3 nights I tried it. It's also fun just to mess around telling bullshit. Just innocent, maybe PG-13 bullshit, nothing offensive or related to genitals. :)

      You've probably seen videos of that piano-singer guy on chatroulette. There are genuine, nice and fun people too on it. Well there used to be at least, it may have (and probably has) degenerated...

    6. Re:Question about chatroulette by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I'm sure he didn't mean to imply that penises and overweight bald guys were mutually exclusive.

    7. Re:Question about chatroulette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the correct term is "penes".

    8. Re:Question about chatroulette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an important note for all overweight or bald people, these qualities make you as attractive as a penis.

    9. Re:Question about chatroulette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still talk to someone from omegle, which is what people used before chatroulette.

      I think a better question is how many heterosexual people bother to talk to someone from the same sex on a site like that? Even if you arent there for romantic interests, it seems everyone I know (myself included) just skips their own gender.

    10. Re:Question about chatroulette by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I like to advertise my shirt designs. I'll set my camera on a printout with a design and a comment like "Put some clothes on. Get this shirt for $10" and let it sit all day. There is no way to put hyperlinks in, of course, so I just have the URL typed out on the sheet of paper.

    11. Re:Question about chatroulette by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      "If you want to find quality friends on chatroulette you have to wade through all the dicks first." - Cartman

    12. Re:Question about chatroulette by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's penises all the way down.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    13. Re:Question about chatroulette by Myu · · Score: 1

      Some of them looked pretty up to me.

      --
      Myu: ... The map's upside down...
    14. Re:Question about chatroulette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's penises all the way down.

      No, you definitely have that direction backward.

    15. Re:Question about chatroulette by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      Hmm, who would look for a conversation on ChatRoulette? But I can attest it's not all penises and bald guys, there are also vaginas and bare girls (both recorded and live).

      It helps if you go on as a couple, or if you are female, as this guy found out: explanation video

    16. Re:Question about chatroulette by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever used it and engaged in an interesting conversation with a person who became a regular point of contact? Or is it all just penises and overweight bald guys?

      Who says it can't be both?

      Trying to start a genital origami club eh?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  6. Hope it's not as exposed as Goat.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is one ugly exposure !! EEuh

    1. Re:Hope it's not as exposed as Goat.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I keep finding users in the Christmas Islands. It's really odd.

  7. jeez, you nerds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Omg omg omg! I'm having a face to face chat with someone, but - I can find out who they are!

    1. Re:jeez, you nerds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg omg omg! I'm having a face to penis chat with someone, but - I can find out who they are!

      FTFY.

  8. Um, OK. by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next article: Privacy flaws In Public Streaking Expose Users

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  9. Nothing New by Ziekheid · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least 2 of the 3 things mentioned in the paper can be done on ANY cam site (blogtv, ustream, tinychat, etc).
    It's truly ridiculous to only mention Chatroulette here and I don't consider any of the things mentioned a real security flaw. 4chan has been "exploiting" these sites for years already, it's nothing new.

    1. Re:Nothing New by socz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's just like the evening news talking about closing down websites that help promote piracy. I always wondered: "why don't they talk about rapidshare, IRC and newsgroups?" Seriously, there's WAY better ways to obtain things than downloading from a website (ddl) or torrent (p2p).

      Maybe if we blew this up, we'd bring more attention (of regulators), but the masses would also be like ohhhhhhhhh!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    2. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's because Chatroulette has some notoriety and maybe the researchers wanted to give people yet another reason not to use it. Sort of a "if you're stupid enough to use Chatroulette, here's what can happen" warning.

    3. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is parent not at -1 Troll yet?

  10. Whoa there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not bald.

    1. Re:Whoa there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a dick.

    2. Re:Whoa there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what your Momma said

  11. researchers? by z-j-y · · Score: 2, Funny

    researchers in universities are seriously out of ideas of what to research

    1. Re:researchers? by Rijnzael · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm actually a CU-Boulder student and had a class with Han last semester. He's a great prof and really cares about the students' understanding. I was surprised to see that he put out research on something so common-knowledge; "Oh once you have a picture of someone you can look for another picture that looks like it and you know you've found your target". He's more of an operating systems/networking kind of guy. This just seems like fluff research to keep the department chair happy while he actually does his teaching and "real" research. Academia has this tendency to prioritize quality over quantity, and I think this provides an example of the pressures even good profs feel from the top re: publishing.

    2. Re:researchers? by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      He's more of an operating systems/networking kind of guy. This just seems like fluff research to keep the department chair happy while he actually does his teaching and "real" research. Academia has this tendency to prioritize quality over quantity, and I think this provides an example of the pressures even good profs feel from the top re: publishing.

      That's a very generous assessment. Obviously, I don't know the guy, but another possible hypothesis is that he's made the oft-repeated mistake of an expert outside his own field, who thinks he's also good enough to be an expert in another field. Academia is chock full of this -- having a good publishing record in one field tends to inflate one's ego, and can frequently lead to moronic research in even a closely related field.

      I'm thinking of you, "obesity spreads through a social network" guy, who is actually a political scientist.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
  12. Drilling Down by derrickh · · Score: 1

    I wasnt aware that enough people posted pictures of their genitalia on Facebook to make accurate comparisons with Chatroulette. I stand corrected.

    D

  13. Shocking revelation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Exposing your face and allowing it to be recorded can lead to your identification! Who knew?

    1. Re:Shocking revelation by rwade · · Score: 1

      Yeah, great point. I thought the point of Chatroulette was to engage people -- if you're engaging them and telling them things about you that can be used in searching for your profile on facebook, well...my point is -- how is that a privacy flaw in Chatroulette? Chatroulette discloses three things:

      1) Your city

      2) What you look like

      3) What you say

      #1 is not enough on its own to identify you. #1 & #2 is not enough on its own to find your name on facebook. #3 is the smoking gun, apparently -- however, Chatroulette has nothing to do with that. What you say is up to you.

  14. All I did was by bigfootchick · · Score: 1

    All I did was /whois USERNAME and I got all their details. Another trick I use is google their name on Facebook. Or lookup FourSquare. :)

  15. Researchers found new feature by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Funny

    "... researchers were able to use IP-mapping services to get a general idea of user's location... Chatroulette is now testing a new feature called Localroulette, which connects people from specific cities with one another."

    Congratulations researchers, you've discovered chatroulette's new features.

    Please tell me taxpayers didn't pay for this research :( "... researchers from the University of Colorado at Boulder and McGill University ..."

    DOH!

    they weren't researching anything, network admin probably noticed IP logs of them spending all day on chatroulette and they had to come up with some excuse.

    *phone rings*
    Person answering: Hello?
    Admin: is this the research office of (BLANK)?
    "Researcher": Yes it is
    Admin: I'm the network admin for (insert "prestigious" university) and we've noticed someone in your office has spent the last 4 months on a website by the name of "chatroulette". Do you know anything about this?
    "Researcher": Um.... what's the website?
    Admin: Chatroulette
    "Researcher": ..... no, no doesn't ring a bell
    Admin: Well if you notice anyone please let us know. The website is known for inappropriate content (NSFW) and we'll be monitoring the PC logins of the individuals and alert campus security once we know who is visiting the website.
    "Researcher": OH Chatroulette! Oh yes I'm very familiar with that website, we're researching it
    Admin: Research?
    "Researcher": Yes research. We're... um, "probing" it's vulnerabilities, looking for "gaping holes" that "expose" users (chuckle)
    Admin: gaping holes?
    "Researcher": smiling Yes gaping holes... in security
    Admin: Oh i see... well thank you for letting me know, I'll note this in the logs
    "Researcher": You do that, have a good afternoon
    Admin: You too

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  16. gaping privacy holes? by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    gaping privacy holes

    Why would that phrase ever be used when discussing Chatroulette.

  17. Re:Misleading title by a_nonamiss · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Additionally, you should be modded redundant.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  18. Dupe? by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought this was the exact issue the U.S. miltary had when they had soldiers posting geotagged pictures to facebook which identified where they were in Afghanistan. Same idea - people, given a few small details, can very easily find out about you by the use of Google.

    Back when I was in first year university (1996) it was still pretty wild west on the internet. I was talking to a friend who I had never given any of my real details (name, address, etc) when she popped up and asked if I went to AMHS (my high school). After picking my jaw off the floor I found out that I had mistakenly forwarded them an E-mail which I had originally forwarded from my school account to my hotmail account. They found the e-mail address, and googled it. It was all laid out there on the Universities' website.

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    1. Re:Dupe? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      I believe the Facebook issue is fairly different. In that case, it's not Facebook doing the geotagging, it's fancy new cameras (often built in to smartphones) that tag the image file itself with the location, as best as the camera can determine it at the time. Facebook then just makes that metadata easily available.

      In this situation, it's the obvious problem of a peer-to-peer connection, namely that each peer knows the other's IP address, and from that you can start to narrow down a location, often fairly precisely.

    2. Re:Dupe? by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I thought facebook stripped all metadata?

      When you upload a photo to facebook, it is heavily compressed into a few stock sizes. The focus on compression to speed things up and save bandwidth is probably at the point of removing the few bytes taken by even the most basic EXIF data...facebook photo can be flipped through incredibly quickly (due to optimization and preloading). I am sure they keep that data stored safely away somewhere (and may someday add the ability to view it), but it certainly isn't in the pictures they actually serve up.

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:Dupe? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Giving away your location by posting your GPS coordinates is slightly different than giving away your location by having someone analyze your IP and a picture of you.

    4. Re:Dupe? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      That's a very good question, I'll have to experiment.

    5. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They found the e-mail address, and googled it.

      Don't you mean, AltaVistaed it?

    6. Re:Dupe? by enjar · · Score: 1

      If someone Googled something in 1996 they would have access to time travel. Just sayin ...

  19. What a waste of everyone's time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Guys pretending to be women
    2) Using IP addresses to find a general location
    3) Finding someone on Facebook based on their interests

    How are any of these things new?

  20. Yes by axl917 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still talk to a girl in Sicily I ran into on roulette a few months ago. It is rare, but you can find normal people there.

    1. Re:Yes by wjousts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, when asked, she said it's just overweight bald guys and penis'

  21. Those aren't flaws by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing mentioned in TFA is a flaw with Chatroulette, they're simply byproducts of this type of communication. If I printed a picture of myself and stapled it to a telephone pole someone could possibly identify me and try to scam me, too. Does this mean telephone poles have flaws?

    1. Re:Those aren't flaws by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot Your Rights Online Story | Privacy Flaws in Telephone Poles Expose Users

  22. People are still using Chatroulette? by Hell0W0rld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought this was only made for some /b/tards and bored journalists.

  23. Your story... by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

    Your story reminded me of an experience I had back around that same time period ('96 or '97), when ICQ was fairly new and I was in my last year of college.

    My sister spent a lot of time on ICQ and made a few friends. Apparently some guy on there used what little information she had shared with him (I don't know exactly what that was) and was able to put together enough information on her to figure out exactly where she lived. Soon after, he made some some thinly veiled threats to show up at her home and possibly cause her and her son harm. She was concerned, so she came to me.

    I took little information that she could provide me with about him (along with his IP), and managed to determine not only what his real name, but also his place of employment, names and e-mail addresses of members of management at his company, and determined that he had sent these threats to my sister from his work computer during work hours.

    He was in another country (Canada), so I doubted he was a real threat to her, but management at that company still was not happy to hear about this guy's behavior when I reported it to them.

  24. I hate to be all Captain Obvious on you, but... by TheABomb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you plug in a camera, sit down in front of said camera, and broadcast said camera to random strangers, the very notion of a "privacy flaw" becomes moot.

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  25. Are you kidding me? by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Privacy flaws in Chatroulette? Based on what I've seen on Chatroulette, these are not people who care much about privacy!

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  26. title formulated for maximum comment count by xmousex · · Score: 1

    in before a million comments about 'exposing' ...too late

  27. Kill yourself by initialE · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your friend is a gay apple fanboy that goes on Chatroulette, and he enjoys seeing penises on the internet, never mind that he can recognize one immediately by the shape, color or size.

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  28. MiTM attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I performed a dead-simple MITM on ChatRoulette. Take two different virtual webcam programs. Open two browser windows. Set it up so browser window A is using a "webcam" that's actually a live screen capture of the other person in browser window B, and vice versa. It's crappily slow, and it doesn't forward chats. The chat forwarding could be easily automated with AutoHotKey. I just forwarded it by hand with copy and paste if it seemed interesting. Plus you can inject your own comments if you want which is fun.

  29. How is this news? by Lando · · Score: 1

    Ummm, gee it's simple enough to get someone's facebook account. I generally do it by saying, "What's your facebook account?" How is this a security flaw?

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  30. Shock horror. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    IP can be used to track area.

    Social engineering can provide you with people's details.

    Film at eleven.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  31. Quick ! by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    Someone notify CmdrTaco that kdawson got a hold of his password.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.