Slashdot Mirror


Leaving a Comment? That'll Be 99 Cents, and Your Name

netbuzz writes "Anxious to lift a ban on comments brought about by incessant trolling and anonymous slander, a Massachusetts newspaper has begun requiring two things of online readers who want to leave their thoughts on stories: a one-time fee of 99 cents and a willingness to use their real names. Says the publisher: 'This is a necessary step, in my opinion, if The Attleboro (MA) Sun Chronicle is going to continue to provide a forum for comments on our websites.'"

4 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Good Idea by cpghost · · Score: 5, Informative

    The 99 cent one-time fee is a great way to verify user identity by using the banking / credit-card system.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  2. Re:if its a small town paper by SocialEngineer · · Score: 4, Informative

    (I'm the Systems Manager for a local newspaper, and also had to deal with administration of local forums) Even in my smallish town, the trolls are quite able to get around IP bans and more (many are still on dialup, but we have had some utilize proxy services, or SOCKS proxies - I knew I shouldn't have written that guide a few years back :P). Beyond that, we also get trolls who aren't even living in the area anymore.

    As far as the rubber room, while it's a good idea, many papers don't have staff capable of developing systems like that, and are using CMSes not developed in-house. Hell, many small papers don't even HAVE a "web guy/gal" to manage the site. Still, it is feasible that it would function well once implemented.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  3. But the banks DON'T verify that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    > The 99 cent one-time fee is a great way to verify user identity by using the banking / credit-card system.

    Yeah, umm... The thing about that is that they don't verify your identity. At all.

    No, seriously you can get a credit card in ANYONE'S name so long as you're paying the bill. They verify the transaction, not the person's identity.

  4. Re:Dept of Troll Prevention.... by honkycat · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not filtering of different opinions, it's filtering of the trolls who post off-topic graffiti and goatse links rather than actually taking part in the discussion. OP was spot on. Slashdot's moderation system works because it has a huge army of visitors that can be tapped for mod duties. Most newspaper websites have nowhere near enough visitors to do this. Just look at the number of posts on a typical slashdot post and compare it to the most popular articles on a local newspaper: slashdot probably wins by an order of magnitude.