Slashdot Mirror


BP Claims Gulf Well Has Been Stopped

An anonymous reader writes with word that BP has announced the Gulf oil spill has been stopped. Another reader adds more detail: "The last valve on the new cap has been closed, and the flow of oil and gas into the sea has stopped. That doesn't mean it's over. It is unclear whether the steel casing deep in the well can contain the pressure. The risk is that it could burst, which would eventually cause a rupture on the sea floor that would make things much messier to deal with. However, they're monitoring the pressure buildup carefully and if the pressure holds over the next 48 hours (indicating there is no leak below the sea floor), they'll assess what to do next. If it doesn't hold at the expected readings, then they'll re-attach the pipe used for producing to the surface and start collecting again. Regardless of what happens the relief well still has to be completed to permanently plug the well with cement, which could take a couple more weeks."

9 of 601 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Picture or it didn't happen! by bhlowe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to multiple video feeds.. Looks good to me!

  2. Re:Whew by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If they could have just stopped the leak, they would have one the first day. In fact, they tried that, but the BOP was broken... That is what this whole issue is about.

    The collection of oil was to prevent that oil from going into the water, and also gave them something positive to report on.

    In addition, the collection effort required some stops that made the capping of the well possible at all. As part of the capping process the cut the riser of the well (and eventually removed the riser cap) which is where this cap is installed.

    I'm sure that no one wanted to stop this well leak more than BP.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  3. Re:Whew by Rakishi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The well was a write off from the moment the thing started leaking. Everyone knew that. I mean seriously, they can barely cap the thing, how in god's name do you expect them to repair all the damage that was done to it?

    It's orders of magnitude cheaper and easier to just drill another well, they're not some magical things that suddenly shows up in the middle of the ocean, we can make more of them.

  4. Re:Whew by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 5, Informative
    You know, I was going to lament the waste that it seems it will be to pump the relief well and seal off this oil well because of the vastness of the reserve and how much oil and natural gas they could get from it since they can collect it now with the cap on it.

    Before I did that though, I did a little digging to find out how many other projects BP has in the Gulf of Mexico just to see if maybe they have a high percentage rate of success and this is just one of hundreds or something,
    It turns out BP has only 9 (admittedly huge) projects in the Gulf of Mexico. Source
    (count the number of projects in the ride hand column)

    I had to find that in the way back machine because BP took down the page listing their Gulf of Mexico projects. They even still link
    to it (again, look at the column on the right "Gulf of Mexico Facilities) but they broke the link. It's funny, when I peruse that page (via the way back machine) BP brags about their "new and untested" tech that they use to go to "unprecedented depths". It looks like their a little ashamed of it now.

    Anyway, after seeing that they only have 9 facilities in the Gulf maybe this well is better sealed off. I went looking for a reason to trust BP with reopening this well and getting the oil and gas they went there for but a 1 in 9 failure rate is not impressive. Seal that sucker off.

  5. Re:Picture or it didn't happen! by shacky003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the direct feed link from BP - http://www.bp.com/liveROVFeed
    It starts all feeds on load, click on the videos themselves to get a decent fullscreen res look at each..

  6. Re:Whew by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Informative

    And they'll still charge us $3 a gallon for it.

    Haha I wish.

    Signed,
    The rest of the world

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  7. Re:Not a permanent solution. by blair1q · · Score: 5, Informative

    here's what I heard:

    1. they capped it.
    2. they closed the cap
    2a. if the pressure suddenly drops, they know the pipe is ruptured below and they are forcing oil into the sea floor, where it will seep up into the sea, meaning the cap is not preventing a leak, just shifting it to the rupture. they will open the cap immediately and work to start pumping oil to the surface.
    2b. if the pressure is high and holding, they will monitor for up to 48 hours it to determine if it is dropping slowly.
    2b(1). if it is, then there is likely a leak below and they will work to start pumping oil to the surface, to keep the pressure in the pipe low while they wait for the relief well to be completed.
    2b(2). if it is not, then the pipe is stable and intact
    2b(2)(i). they may keep the cap in place and wait for the relief well to be completed
    2b(2)(ii). they may work to start pumping oil to the surface while they wait for the relief well to be completed.
    3. when the relief well is completed, they will open the cap, or remove the pumps, and pump concrete into the pipe to cap this wellhead permanently. the relief well will in any case be the production wellhead for this shaft.

    what's really shocking about the whole deal isn't that they had a faulty blowout preventer, it's that they always knew that the pipe and the rock surrounding it were at points not strong enough to contain the pressure in the well. they knew this either before they started drilling or shortly after, and still they drilled all the way to the oil. they knew that there was no way ever to completely cap this well. as soon as they hit the oil, they would have to allow it to flow to keep the pressure low, or it would eventually rupture the pipe and vent the entire oilfield into the seafloor and then to the sea. and, for some reason, they foresaw no reasonable circumstance under which that plan might fail. they believed it not possible that they wouldn't be able to complete the well and pump it continuously, without a problem, without ever having to stop the flow. and they apparently suppressed knowledge of the entire consideration, because anyone looking at the concept would immediately say they were not only courting disaster, but raising it to a high probability of occurring.

    frankly, i think it makes the deaths of those 11 men nothing short of murder.

  8. Re:Unreadiness for Spills by abundance · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The reasons for why this failed" are not so unknown, since it's known that the welhead's blowout preventer had gone under repair and maintenance works that were identified as inadequate, exposing to the risk of BOP's failure, in a note that a BP's contractor sent to BP management.

    There were also internal notes about the probable inadequacy of the wellhead cement casing, and various reports about dangerous shortcuts took in the operations of the drill in the days preceding the incident, which were protested by the drill workers.

    :/

  9. Re:Unreadiness for Spills by sectoidman · · Score: 5, Informative

    The acoustic dead-man's switch wouldn't have been any help, since it's linked to the same valve on the BOP that failed even when they sent robots to manually shut it down. And, that valve failed because of an accident that happened some weeks before that destroyed the annulus seals: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/16/60minutes/main6490197_page4.shtml. I agree that the relief wells should be required for this kind of eventuality, but if BP hadn't been criminally negligent in maintaining its equipment, this never would have happened.