Slashdot Mirror


Attackers Using Social Networks For Botnet Control

Trailrunner7 writes "Bot herders and the crimeware gangs behind banker Trojans have had a lot of success in the last few years with using bulletproof hosting providers as their main base of operations. But more and more, they're finding that social networks such as Twitter and Facebook are offering even more fertile and convenient grounds for controlling their malicious creations. New research from RSA shows that the gangs behind some of the targeted banker Trojans that are such a huge problem in some countries, especially Brazil and other South American nations, are moving quietly and quickly to using social networks as the command-and-control mechanisms for their malware. The company's anti-fraud researchers recently stumbled upon one such attack in progress and watched as it unfolded."

28 of 40 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious next step by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Steganography. Of course it alone won't keep a good virus researcher from figuring out what's going on, but Facebook/whoever will just see a legitimate profile (and that may make it that much harder to get it taken down).

    Messages posted, postings on others' walls, images posted, even friends made in a particular order could all carry hidden meaning for watching malware.

    1. Re:Obvious next step by countSudoku() · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would love to mod this "Like", but I fear that will launch an attach from BotVille. Speaking of which, why not just use a malware metaphor, say farming, build up a fake business around that as a "game". Then let thousands of stupid people who like shitty "games" play it to control and command their warez-botz-thingyz? Ooops, too late!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Obvious next step by sea4ever · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure but I think that facebook makes some changes to pictures you upload, compresses them and so forth.
      That seems to be the case when I upload a large photo directly from my camera, and on facebook it has been scaled down.
      So I guess it would work as long as the data doesn't get corrupted.

    3. Re:Obvious next step by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Uh, malware scans a list of 10k profiles, and you think they will be able to figure out what it is looking for with all the associated posts, pictures and notes? There is a reason you are an anonymous coward. And it is because of your stupidity.

    4. Re:Obvious next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is still valid regardless of how much you obfuscate the process of searching for commands. Lets say you have a botnet client that scans the images on 10,000 Facebook profiles looking for commands hidden by a steganographic process. A security researcher who has a copy of your botnet client is still able to either disassemble your client or monitor the execution/memory of your client and reverse engineer whatever methods you use to search for commands.

      It's similar to the way a piece of software checks if it has a valid serial; this process may be obfuscated but it's still possible for crackers to reverse engineer this and create a key generator.

      Note: I'm not the same AC as above.

    5. Re:Obvious next step by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      You said it yourself, steganography is used when trying to conceal that communication is taking place. Isn't that what botnet operators want?

      Assuming that access to Facebook, etc. isn't already blocked, a network admin isn't going to notice image downloads from Facebook as quickly as they would repeated hits to http://botnetsite.ru/ and there is a lesser chance of the botnet being detected at all.

    6. Re:Obvious next step by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

      I jokingly suggested something related before- create some software to have servers to join facebook, and those servers can answer stupid quizzes like "20 Ways to know if you're a Windows 2008 R2 server".

      With status messages like:
      ProcessingNode192 is bored (has nothing to do)...
      StorageServer01 is feeling degraded (on array #2)...

      --
    7. Re:Obvious next step by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      And posting inane bullshit to your wall.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    8. Re:Obvious next step by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Noting that in this case, the malware did not bother hiding the messages, but just posted them as notes instead

    9. Re:Obvious next step by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

      If defenders could figure out the code, well, I believe this vignette from Star Trek: Next Gen will help:

      Data: I have access to the Borg collective

      Picarborg: Sleep. Sleep, Data.

      Dr. Crusher: He must be exhausted.

      Data: Most certainly. But I think he may be telling us something.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Finally, IRC is safe! by lemur3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was really starting to worry that these Command & Control things that use IRC chatrooms were going to ruin the good reputation that IRC has built up over the years.

    1. Re:Finally, IRC is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      wow you're kind of a douche bag. chill out man

    2. Re:Finally, IRC is safe! by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

      IRC is a pretty primitive chat program, so it will never earn a good reputation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ in case you're bored.

    3. Re:Finally, IRC is safe! by Kozz · · Score: 1

      While it's true that honest, spontaneous spit-takes are rare, they're an exceptional sight to behold -- specifically because you know they're so rare.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    4. Re:Finally, IRC is safe! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I was once booted from a #Unix IRC channel for being too smart.

      True story.

    5. Re:Finally, IRC is safe! by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      I got caught off-guard enough that I had an improperly-chewed bit of a Slim Jim that I was about to swallow try to traverse my nostril. It happens, and it can SERIOUSLY hurt.

      Serials.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
  3. is this news? by WillgasM · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought they had been doing this for a long time now.

    1. Re:is this news? by Cicada7 · · Score: 1

      fits squarely in the stuff that matters, but no, not news really.

  4. Yes, Marianne, hackers innnovate. any other news? by ehack · · Score: 1

    Yes, Marianne, hackers innnovate. any other news?

    --
    This is not a signature.
  5. The new IRC? by bjartur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meh, IRC has been used for this purpose for a long time. Switching to the centralised Twitter service for increased anonymity is just an evolution, not a revolution.

    1. Re:The new IRC? by socz · · Score: 1

      All your IRC are belong to bots!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  6. Re:Yes, Marianne, hackers innnovate. any other new by vxice · · Score: 1

    It may not be news in itself that they innovate but where exactly they are moving to now is news. You could just as easily say all of those words have been written before, in the dictionary. It wouldn't mean that it is not newsworthy.

    --
    every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
  7. Re:Bleary eyed by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

    I think Hackers rather use being Hackers as birth control. Not much time for getting laid when you're pwning teh intrarwebz.

    --
    I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
  8. And? by cffrost · · Score: 1

    Advertisers have been using all kinds of networks to "control their bots" since the dawn of civilization. Anyway, we each gotta do our bit... good of society, et al.

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  9. Please stop calling them 'cybercriminals' by mhwombat · · Score: 1

    It's as if a journalist is trying to make nerdy white-collar crime sound cool.

    Stop it journalists! You're making it worse! Ooh, and now they're using crimeware!

  10. this is atleast 10 years old... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    So it changes from hotmail to facebook, or aol to twitter, or icq to myspace...it is all the same use a free networking tool to communicate to your botnet commands .....I use /. myself....so much cooler, especially when you get modded down you can implement an auto attack for the person modding you down... ; )

  11. Already possible by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    OSSEC HIDS supports status updates via twitter, so your IDS control server can gossip and bitch about the ailments of its clients like a senile small-town doctor:

    http://www.ossec.net/dcid/?p=168

    You could also use Twidge and your imagination to come up with some cron jobs that post server status updates.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel