eBook Sales Outpace Hardbacks
dptalia writes "Amazon announced that for every 100 hardback books they sell, 180 eBooks are sold. In addition, they've seen sales for Kindles triple since they lowered the price. But traditionalists shouldn't panic yet — paperbacks are still the king."
I love my Kindle. I buy about one book per week. It's gotten to the point where if a book I'm looking for isn't available in ebook format, I simply don't buy that book. I want my entire library available to me anywhere I go. I don't want to haul around dead trees.
The publishers who haven't released their books in ebook format are simply daft.
A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
I buy hardbacks when they're available but a lot of times I find that a book is only available as paperback. With a few books it even seems that while there are no new hardbacks being printed libraries are still able to get the latest edition as a hardback from somewhere, no wonder hardback sales are down when you can't even buy them most of the time...
Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
This is not at all surprising especially for travelers or those who have limited space but like to read many books. As military my PRS-505 allowed me to bring and entire library with me for the size of a small notepad to Iraq as opposed to a half dozen books. The reading experience was close enough to reading a paperback that it isn't worth mentioning except for a few purists.
The picture viewing and manga reading was also sublime. To me the pictures while grayscale looked like they could have been pencil drawn and were easily readable.
The ONLY downside I found was the screen refresh but it wasn't much more than turning a page and easily adapted to.
I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
Or, of course, the fact that some people like the way a book *feels*. The way a page feels when you turn it. While simulated page turns are nice eye candy, an e reader doesn't provide the tactile feedback of a physical object.
The e-Ink displays work by reflected light. So they should photograph quite nicely. So why bother with scanner? Set a digital camera on a tripod, set it to take one picture per second. Click on the next button one click per second. Should be easier than scanner.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
Now all they have to do to ban all books is just silently delete them remotely from your kindle while you sleep. No firemen required.
And you'll have people in small camps living like vagrants reciting books to each other.
We've already got the wall-sized TVs blaring idiot-shows at us all day long, so banning books can't be far behind.
Never mind Orwell, we're closer to Bradbury's reality. Oh Montag, we need you!
If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
Only one person goes through that effort, then everyone else who wants a digital copy will download it. Bookwarez is older than e-books.
It's like arguing against selling digital music or movies because it makes it easier to copy -- Yeah, it does, but ripping DVDs/CDs happens anyways, at least this way you have a chance of making money.
Wouldnt you rather let the people who want to have a digital copy be able to buy it, rather than forcing everyone to pirate it or go without?
To the extent its preventing illegal copying, so what? The copying is illegal, but trivial cost and effort to do without the DRM. The DRM is illegal to remove, but trivial cost and effort. Net result: with or without the DRM, the illegal copying is illegal, and trivial in cost and effort.
Where is the benefit of the DRM?
I have two Nooks... believe me, I did not buy them for the "lend" feature, which is nearly pointless in it's implementation...
SOME publishers "allow" some books to be lent... ONE TIME ONLY, and ONLY for fourteen days. After that, you can not lend it anymore.
By buying into e-books (which I've done, I had my reasons why I ultimately thought it was a good way to go), you are removing any right to resale/donate you have with other books.
Because of this fact, cost of books should not enter the equation for determining whether to buy an e-book reader or not... most of the paperbacks I looked into cost less than a dollar more than the e-book version, and you didn't give up your rights.
Stupid, sexy Flanders.