Slashdot Mirror


Passwords That Are Simple — and Safe (?)

TravisTR submitted a story that talks about simpler passwords. I don't think anyone disagrees that having elaborate rules with 20 char passwords requiring mixed cases and symbols and requiring them to change frequently is a pain, but I'm not sure that allowing unique but simpler passwords is a better idea.

4 of 563 comments (clear)

  1. deh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't use simple words that can't easily be found using dictionnary bruteforce ?

    And most hacked account come from shitty secret question/answer that can let you change password.

  2. don't ever use the word "password" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Call it a "passphrase." Ban that other word.

    1. Re:don't ever use the word "password" by swilly · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. There is only so much entropy the human brain can remember, but I can remember phrases quite well. Throw in a few digits and special characters instead of letters and you have the perfect balance between security and ease of use. Unfortunately I keep seeing maximum passwords lengths, which is just stupid. I suspect maximum password lengths are caused by lazy developers and web sites that store passwords instead of hashes of passwords.

      Don't know if typing phrases would be better for everyone though. Interested to know how non-touch typists would deal with something like "It w@s the b3st of times, It was the worst of times".

  3. Re:Simple by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When your password rules have a net effect of disallowing people from using their familiar pneumonic systems for remembering passwords, you force them to write the passwords down.

    I assume this is when someone uses a captive bolt gun to threaten you to reveal your password...

    And having written-down passwords negates the benefit of all those special characters

    This is a misconception. Forcing the user to write down a password allows the password to be much longer, and probably much more impervious to attack over the network. The fact that it's written down makes the password as insecure as the place where it's written down. If that place is behind a locked door, perhaps in the room containing the protected machine itself, then the password is about as secure as you could expect, since if someone can get into that room they're going to have access to everything that password protects, password or no. A sheet of paper in a wallet is also valid, since people keep extremely valuable bits of information that can be easily changed and cancelled in their wallet as well.

    Encryption keys require a different sort of discipline, but again just because something is memorizable doesn't mean it absolutely better than something written down, or contained in a separate, secure place.

    You have to ask, "what is this password protecting?" If it's protecting a box from network attack, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD USE BIG PASSWORDS AND WRITE THEM DOWN! If you're protecting data from more, ah, physical or intimate incursion, a memorized password is a start, but it had better not be the only part of the puzzle. Since network attacks are a much bigger problem these days than someone breaking into your house, the first solution is probably going to be much more practical and effective.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.