Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Wants Ownership Case Thrown Out
crimeandpunishment writes "Attorneys for Facebook and a New York man claiming majority ownership of the site faced off in a Buffalo courtroom Tuesday, and if Facebook gets its way there won't be too many more days in court. The site wants to get Paul Ceglia's claim thrown out of court. He claims a seven-year-old agreement with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg entitles him to 84 percent of the company. Facebook acknowledges Ceglia and Zuckerberg worked together, but says the contract Ceglia submitted was full of 'things that don't make sense.'"
full of 'things that don't make sense'
The contract or farcebook itself? YOU MAKE THE CALL!!1! I count 500 million things on FB that don't make sense and counting! Just 5.5B users to sign up, and we'll have a wicked-big party and all friend each other and likes will be passed around as if to simulate something that get's passed around. It'll be fun. Friend me, Saddo!
This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
And the individual who's campaigning on a bar-napkin contract, only because the site is now successful, having done no entrepreneurial work of his own—Ceglia isn't a douchebag?
It seems odd that you choose to character-assassinate Zuckerberg on the terms, "he should go back to banking where he belongs." Why's that? Because he's a Harvard student? Because he's Jewish? I've heard this kind of attack, particularly from engineers, particularly from students of computer science. Before we start speculating on Zuckerberg's sense of entitlement and arrogance, let's speak to yours: since when do you get to judge winners and losers? What "kind" of person is he? What "redeeming qualities"? Have you met him? Did you read Accidental Billionaires and feel you know everything about him, and can generalize about young entrepreneurs in general?
The audience resents success. But I resent comments of such obvious, visceral prejudice.
And thats yet another reason Zuckerfuck needs to be put in jail. Not disclosing the contract most certainly makes every move the Z douche has made illegal, he's commited SO much fraud I doubt he can tell where it starts and where it ends. He's been selling bits of a company that he doesn't even own a controlling interest in thanks to how he was attempting to rip someone else off.
When Facebook got money, the concept of DD for an Internet company was something along the lines of 'is the site up right now? Yea? Good enough for me!' Or 'No? Ehh, its a website no big deal we can fix it tomorrow, thats Good enough for me!
If this turns out to be legit, there are going to be several VC companies that will rape him over this, rightly so.
Can we please just put a bullet in his head and save everyone a lot of money and time?
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
The liberals got it exactly right. For years now they’ve been telling us how “vibrant” mass immigration has made stale, pale White societies. Well, London was certainly vibrating on 7th July and that got me thinking: What else have the liberals got right? Mass immigration “enriches” us too, they’ve always said. Is that “enrich” as in “enriched uranium”, an excellent way of making atom bombs? Because that’s what comes next: a weapon of real mass destruction that won’t kill people in piffling dozens but in hundreds of thousands or millions. Bye-bye London, bye-bye Washington, bye-bye Tel Aviv.
I’m not too sure I’d shed a tear if the last-named went up in a shower of radioactive cinders, but Tel Aviv is actually the least likely of the three to be hit. What’s good for you ain’t good for Jews, and though Jews have striven mightily, and mighty successfully, to turn White nations into multi-racial fever-swamps, mass immigration has passed the Muzzerland safely by. And mass immigration is the key to what happened in London. You don’t need a sophisticated socio-political analysis taking in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Jewish control of Anglo-American foreign policy, British colonialism, and fifteen centuries of Christian-Muslim conflict. You can explain the London bombs in five simple words:
Pakis do not belong here.
And you can sum up how to prevent further London bombs – and worse – in three simple words:
PAKI GO HOME.
At any time before the 1950s, brown-skinned Muslim terrorists would have found it nearly impossible to plan and commit atrocities on British soil, because they would have stood out like sore thumbs in Britain’s overwhelmingly White cities. Today, thanks to decades of mass immigration, it’s often Whites who stand out like sore thumbs. Our cities swarm with non-whites full of anti-White grievances and hatreds created by Judeo-liberal propaganda. And let’s forget the hot air about how potential terrorists and terrorist sympathizers are a “tiny minority” of Britain’s vibrant, peace-loving Muslim “community”.
Even if that’s true, a tiny minority of 1.6 million (2001 estimate) is a hell of a lot of people, and there’s very good reason to believe it isn’t true. Tony Blair has tried to buy off Britain’s corrupt and greedy “moderate” Muslims with knighthoods and public flattery, but his rhetoric about the “religion of peace” wore thin long ago. After the bombings he vowed, with his trademark bad actor’s pauses, that we will... not rest until... the guilty men are identified... and as far... as is humanly possible... brought to justice for this... this murderous carnage... of the innocent.
His slimy lawyer’s get-out clause – “as far as is humanly possible” – was soon needed. Unlike Blair and his pal Dubya in Iraq and Afghanistan, the bombers were prepared not only to kill the innocent but to die themselves as they did so. And to laugh at the prospect: they were captured on CCTV sharing a joke about the limbs and heads that would shortly be flying. Even someone as dim as Blair must know you’ve got a big problem on your hands when there are over 1.6 million people in your country following a religion like that.
If he doesn’t know, there are plenty of Jewish journalists who will point it out for him. There’s the neo-conservative Melanie Phillips in Britain, for example, who never met an indignant adverb she didn’t like, and the neo-conservative Mark Steyn in Canada, who never met an indignant Arab he didn’t kick. Reading their hard-hitting columns on Muslim psychosis, I was reminded of a famous scene in Charles Dickens’ notoriously anti-Semitic novel Oliver Twist (1839). The hero watches the training of the villainous old Jew Fagin put into action by the Artful Dodger:
What was Oliver’s h
Freaking awesome.
Now we have lawyers on slashdot ... because they read it on Wikipedia.
Do you guys go to real lawyers and tell them about how you read wikipedia and know how you want to handle your court case?
I'm just curious how long it takes for them to clean out your bank account or laugh you out of the room, and which one happens most often in your case.
Why would he do that? If they start making offers for 50%, he knows he's whipped their ass and will hold out for it in its entirety. I would at least, just to spank the ever living fuck out of Zuckerdouche.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
One of you queers here on Slashdot needs to fuck Zuckerberg up the ass and give him HIV.
Zuckerberg will then die of AIDs.
Problem solved.