Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple Doesn't Appreciate Toilet Humor

Posted by samzenpus on from the evacuate-different dept.

beaver1024 writes "I doubt if Apple lawyers even contemplated the irony as they slapped a small Australian company producing camping equipment with a lawsuit for trademark violations. Sea to Summit makes a product that assists in the disposal of human excrement, calling it iPood. Apple thinks that 'For obvious reasons, Apple's reputation for clean design and high-tech electronics will suffer should it be associated with latrines and the like through Sea to Summit's use of iPood.' If only Sea to Summit had the resources to fight this in court. Alas, we are witnessing yet another sign of the corrupted nature of IP laws in Australia and internationally."

4 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Low hanging fruit by Reilaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't tell which company is more full of shit.

  2. Re:bullPoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > What the hell is wrong with Apple not wanting its products associated with poo?

    Trademarks are only valid for a specified product category or line of business.

    See, for example, Canon EOS cameras and Volkswagen Eos cabriolet cars; there is no trademark case to answer as the product types are discrete and unambiguous.

    A good example of a trademark conflict would be Apple adopting the iOS product name when Cisco already held IOS as a trademark for an operating system, so the two companies came to an agreement. But if I developed an umbrella I could name it IOS with no legal qualms, other than for overly-litigious Californian companies.

  3. Trademarks are not absolute by bk2204 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing that Apple doesn't seem to get is that trademarks are designed to prevent confusion among products in the same field. If the iPood played music or was electronic in any way, Apple might have a leg to stand on. But nobody is rationally going to think that a trowel can in any way be confused with a portable music player. Not only are the products in question completely different, but so are the respective companies' fields of endeavor. Confusion is not possible here.

  4. Re:bullPoo by SETIGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't matter whether it's desirable for Apple. Apple doesn't have legal grounds to stop them from using the iPood name. So Apple is stopping them using financial means.

    --
    Support SETI@home