Slashdot Mirror
GOP Senators Move To Block FCC On Net Neutrality
suraj.sun writes "Seven Republican senators have announced a plan to curb the Obama administration's push to impose controversial Net neutrality regulations on the Internet."
"The FCC's rush to take over the Internet is just the latest example of the need for fundamental reform to protect consumers," says Sen. Jim DeMint, who I'm sure truly only has the consumer's needs at heart — since his campaign contributions list AT&T in his top five donating organizations.
The Republican party needs to be disbanded; forcibly if necessary. Whenever there is the potential for doing something suicidally stupid, totalitarian, or both, the Grand Old Party can be counted on to lead the charge. Truthfully, if we could just get rid of the Right in general, it'd be a major step forward, I tend to think these days.
The older I get, the harder Left I get.
Anyone who mentioned a political party in any way to support or oppose net neutrality gets +5 sheeple.
Maybe I'll post a similar article in a week or two with DNC opposing net neutrality and everyone can reverse their opinions and get -5 sheeple.
Then we can see where we got ourselves again...
Fucking nowhere...
"In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
We are a Republic so we don't have the masses deciding "what's good for everyone". It is a representative Republic. What's good for one State might not be good for another.
My God, the FCC attempts a blatant power grab and the Slashdot crowd thinks it's great. The President does a blatant power grab with warrantless wiretapping and suddenly facism is upon us. It's the same damn thing you idiots! Wake the fuck up!
Without net neutrality, there's nothing stopping a site like Amazon from paying Comcast to slow traffic to any other retail site. Similarly, there's be great disincentive for network owners to allow access to bandwidth-hogging sites, so YouTube, Hulu, and most other video sites would never have been created, let alone new ones allowed to thrive.
Sure there is, it's called negative user feedback. Amazon would backpedal so fast your head would spin. Look at what happened when Blizzard tried to make all their users use their real name on their forums. They reversed course the next day due to the overwhelming negative response.
Unlike the current administration, businesses realize that if they piss off their customers, their customers will go elsewhere. The competition between Comcast and whoever else may be scant in some areas, but it does exist.
Net neutrality means that access remains free (as in freedom). Lack of it is a massive gift to network providers at the expense of free information. When the government abuses their power, then it's time to get your panties in a bunch. This bill abuses nothing, and grants no powers that the government doesn't already have.
Net neutrality means nothing of the sort. Net neutrality tells the providers that they can't charge for tiered access, something they already do. So your $40 per month cable bill will instantly go to over $100. If they have to give the same quality of service to everyone, you can bet your ass that they're going to make sure you pay for it. This bill removes the freedom we all enjoy right now. I'll take throttled traffic over a tripled bill any day of the week.
I would be willing to accept that Obama is not a real socialist, he seems much closer to being a fascist to me.
The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
It is. Obama was elected because people were tired of Bush, not because of anything specific that he stands for. He is already more unpopular than Bush was at the same point, in fact almost any president.
Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
Well, we will never know, since people like you seem to think that the best way to fix problems created by government regulation is more government regulation.
The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison