Slashdot Mirror


SFLC Wants To Avoid Death by Code

foregather writes "The Software Freedom Law Center has released some independent research on the safety of software close to our hearts: that inside of implantable medical devices like pacemakers and insulin pumps. It turns out that nobody is minding the store at the regulatory level and patients and doctors are blocked from examining the source code keeping them alive. From the article: 'The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for evaluating the risks of new devices and monitoring the safety and efficacy of those currently on market. However, the agency is unlikely to scrutinize the software operating on devices during any phase of the regulatory process unless a model that has already been surgically implanted repeatedly malfunctions or is recalled. ... Despite the crucial importance of these devices and the absence of comprehensive federal oversight, medical device software is considered the exclusive property of its manufacturers, meaning neither patients nor their doctors are permitted to access their IMD's source code or test its security.'"

5 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Stay away from Windows CE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the July 2010 updates bluescreened my 81-year-old dad.

    The hospital backed out the update but they had to reboot him in safe mode and go up the back door.

     

  2. Someone needs to write a country music song.... by coastal984 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....with the line "She hacked into my heart and crashed me."

  3. Proprietary pacemaker code excerpt by turing_m · · Score: 4, Funny

    // max_int should be enough for anyone
    for(i = 0; i < max_int;i++){
      sleep(1);
      beat_heart();
    }

    // printf("hi!!!!!\n")

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  4. Re:Same as in the pilot seat by segin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, so because a few employees within a company (and maybe a closely related partner) have looked over the source, it's "peer reviewed"? Peer review means that EVERYONE can examine the source, including people you have never met nor have even heard their names. It means that people you absolutely hate can review your source, not just a few of your employees that have no qualms about lying and saying it's all good just to keep their jobs.

    In other words, your source code has had as much legitimate peer review as my dick has, and since I'm a Slashdotter, any claims of sexual activity on my part are instantly dubious by that simple fact alone.

  5. Re:Same as in the pilot seat by rcw-home · · Score: 2, Funny

    The amount of testing and verification that goes into these software categories often exceed the development cost

    That puts the testing quality roughly somewhere between most video games and Windows.