Microsoft Says No To Paying Bug Bounties
Trailrunner7 writes "In the wake of both Mozilla and Google significantly increasing their bug bounties to the $3,000
range, there have been persistent rumors in the security community that Microsoft soon would follow suit and start paying bounties as well. However, a company official said on Thursday that Microsoft was not interested in paying bounties. 'We value the researcher ecosystem, and show that in a variety of ways, but we don't think paying a per-vuln bounty is the best way. Especially when across the researcher community the motivations aren't always financial. It is well-known that we acknowledge researcher's contributions in our bulletins when a researcher has coordinated the release of vulnerability details with the release of a security update,' Microsoft's Jerry Bryant said."
Sadly, no matter how rich Microsoft are, they simply can't afford to write *that* many cheques.
Except I'm a Linux user and my girlfriend is pregnant.
P.S. I'm an Atheist and I'm not buying that immaculate conception bullshit you're selling.
Aw, that's so cute. One day, when you're a big boy and work on real products, with real, steady, repeat customers, we'll talk.
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
It's because to Microsoft, and undiscovered bug is a nonexistant bug. Their "security" model has always been "security through obscurity". Their philosophy is "why fix a bug if you don't have to?"
Yet they proactively fix bugs and distribute those fixes at no cost. Strange.