Slashdot Mirror
Dept. of Justice Considers Web For ADA
beetle496 noted a blog entry saying "The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on the Accessibility of Web Information and Services Provided by Entities Covered by the ADA (i.e., State and Local Government Entities and Public Accommodations). You can read the fact sheet, or the entire notice. In short, the Department is seeking comments on their desire to revise regulation to 'establish specific requirements for State and local governments and public accommodations to make their websites accessible to individuals with disabilities.' The Department is seeking specific comment on many things including the standards they should adopt, and if there should be any exemptions for certain entities (e.g., small business) before they publish their Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. This is amazing news! The impact that this will have for individuals with disabilities cannot be overemphasized. It is time for our digital society to forever include individuals of all abilities. The period of public comment is open for 180 days."
I don't know about you, but my online banking website doesn't look, act or feel like a book or magazine. There is a definite difference between a content web site and a web application.
I personally don't have an issue with requiring accessibility for most sites (as long as you can provide an accessible alternative to your content or web app) - the tools they do use need to be updated more often. Some of the screen readers require IE6.
Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
It never occurred to you that the ADA was the worst fucking law ever?
Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
I find it amazing that a family that had run a hardware store for 2 generations couldn't just build their own ramp. A handicap ramp doesn't need to be made of titanium and carbon fiber, plywood and 2X6's will work just fine. If they didn't have the space due to the way the building was situated on the street/property line/etc, then there are various rules in the law to help deal with that/grandfather in older buildings. If the rules were ignored when they originally built the place, then it's hard to feel sorry for them. Although if it was a rented space, then shouldn't the landlord have been responsible for it?
One time I threw a brick at a duck.