LCD 'Engine' For Spacecraft Attitude Control
Bruce Perens writes "Japan's IKAROS satellite, which earlier performed the first successful demonstration of a solar sail, has broken more new ground. Liquid-crystal displays — yes, like in your video monitor — were fabricated into strips on the edges of the solar sail. By energizing some of the LCDs and changing the reflective characteristics of parts of the sail from specular to diffuse, JAXA scientists successfully generated attitude control torque in the sail, changing the spacecraft's orientation."
It's neat to see this phenomenon being used for a spacecraft.
"The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
Downwind faster than the solar wind!
With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
Neat. Anyone have an order-of-magnitude idea if this could be used for stationkeeping on sats in Earth orbit or for attitude control in deep space missions? Just wondering if it produces enough torque to control a real spacecraft. IIRC, for most spacecraft fuel for attitude control is the limiting factor on mission duration, and I think in some cases (e.g., Kepler) it's the only expendable. Could a spacecraft using this technique have virtually unlimited life? If you're solar powered and don't burn fuel, what limits lifetime-- dust on the solar arrays? Battery degradation?
How about using computed holography driving embedded LCDs to make a light sail act as a sort of synthetic-aperture device? You could have multiple steerable beams, receive with multiple steerable reflections, etc.
Bruce Perens.
As I understood from the press release, the purpose of the test was to find a viable way to control the attitude of the sail itself. Being so thin, it would flutter and probably be ripped apart if handled roughly. An LCD is an interesting idea in this context, although I believe the LCD would be orders of magnitude thicker and heavier than the solar sail.
As for the momentum needed, it would be very small, because the disturbing momentum itself is very small. Since all the perturbation comes from radiation pressure, it's no big deal to get the correction from radiation pressure as well.