Slashdot Mirror


World's Fastest Hybrid OK'd For Production

thecarchik writes "The Porsche 918 Spyder hybrid supercar, first shown as a concept at this spring's Geneva Motor Show, got official approval as a production model today from the company's board of directors. Just consider the specs: a 500-horsepower, 3.6-liter V-8 engine with a 9200-rpm redline, 0-to-62-mph acceleration of 3.2 seconds, and top speed of 198 miles per hour. Oh, and did we mention it gets 78 miles per gallon on the European cycle? The astounding fuel efficiency comes courtesy of an E-Drive mode that lets the 918 Spyder drive up to 16 miles on pure electric power, though [ahem] not at 198 mph."

12 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. SI units by SensiMillia · · Score: 4, Informative

    78 miles per gallon is about 3 liter for 100 km.

    198 miles = 319 kilometers

  2. Deceiving. by pwnies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "78 miles per gallon on the European cycle"

    Sure, and my plug in golf car gets mpg on any test thrown at it. Really that's poor and deceitful advertising. This car is a plug in car - it doesn't generate it's own electricity. It's not like a prius where you just fill it and forget about it, you're supplying another form of energy yourself. Saying what MPG it gets is redundant unless you also show how many Joules of electricity it used in the process as well.

    1. Re:Deceiving. by billcopc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or, for the idiotic mass public:

      "Miles per buck"

      Really, that's all people care about. Multiply by the average cost of a gallon of fuel, or kwh of charge, and spit out a number any cousin-fucking retard can understand. Maybe then people will become a tiny bit more conscious about efficiency, and/or take arms against the energy cartels (a nerd can dream, can't he ?)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  3. Too fast by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    It accelerates so fast they can't even stop the timer before it reaches 62.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:0 to 62? by Simulant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Europe is on the metric system. 62miles is about 100km.

  5. Re:Fitting since Porsche made the first hybrid by netsavior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    d'oh broked link
    Sorry about that

  6. 16 whole miles on battery? wow. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I put a couple of extra batteries in my old Chevy I think I could get that far on the starter.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  7. Re:Tesla by photogchris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, but different Poreche. the hybrid is a 918 spyder, your linking to a Boxster spyder. Basically the Boxster has a 320hp flat 6 while the hybrid 918 has a 500hp V8 plus 2 109hp electric motors. Also it looks to be 4 times more expensive then the Tesla at about $650,000!

    http://nexus404.com/Blog/2010/07/29/porsche-918-spyder-goes-to-production-kind-of-confirmed-back-in-march-the-green-light-on-the-porsche-918-spyder-is-now-officially-on/

  8. Re:Ho hum by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I heard Porsche has a couple okay engineers on staff.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  9. Re:And this one pays for itself... by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do you know they aren't paying to get the superior performance and power delivery afforded by the torque characteristics of electric motors in the drivetrain?

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  10. Re:Question for car engineers by Just_Say_Duhhh · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm an engineer...and a race car driver. You can decide if that qualifies me to answer.

    Electric motors can produce torque at all RPMs, so you don't have to mess around with complex gearing to keep the engine in the "power band."

    Sure, if you wanted to burn rubber, an electric motor would be happy to comply, but if you want a car that is easy to control, you only supply as much torque as the tires can handle (even ICE-powered cars do this). You don't want super-wide tires, because you increase rolling resistance, making the car less efficient. Tire contact patches are optimized for traction and resistance (and then the owner screws that up because he thinks 22" wheels on a sub-compact looks "gnarly!").

    --
    I need trepanation like I need a hole in the head.
  11. Re:Wow! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Informative

    As for Tesla? Screw 'em. We're paying them (government subsidy??) to develop a car they will sell us back at a ridiculous price.

    It's a loan you twat, not a subsidy

    http://www.google.com/search?q=doe+loans+electric+vehicles

    Hell, Nissan got $1.4 billion+, Fisker got around $500 million, GM got $14.4 billion and Chrysler got $8.5 billion. You know who has a solid, proven drivetrain and energy management system? Tesla. There should be some sort of test before you're allowed to post here.