Slashdot Mirror


Google Adds Licensing Server DRM To Android Market

eldavojohn writes "According to AfterDawn, Google has given app makers the option to use a license server as DRM to ensure the user has paid for an app before they can download it. Reportedly, the Market app will communicate with a Google license server using RSA encryption. It is important to note this is only available for non-free apps (built with SDK 1.5 and later), and it was instituted to provide a better solution to the old and widely criticized copy protection scheme that was susceptible to Android app piracy (like sideloading). For better or for worse, Android's Marketplace appears to now have an optional, phone-home form of DRM." Following news of the new licensing service, Hexage Ltd, makers of a popular Android game called Radiant, released the data they had collected on piracy of Radiant over a 10-month period beginning last October. A series of charts shows total users, paid users and the piracy rate, by region.

2 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. I don't see the problem. by DWMorse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At the great risk to my karma, I guess I have to just pipe up and say that I don't see the problem here.

    License-server based apps have been selling on various platforms for years. Decades. Android now supports this, adding a little attraction to developers to invest time and money making an application for use on Android. Given the lack of QA on a great many Android apps (can anyone offer an explanation how Facebook for Android is such pure garbage, all jokes about content aside?) I for one see this as a step in the right direction.

    Android developers, you now have a piracy deterrent for your applications you would like monetary compensation for creating, and more importantly, maintaining. I fail to see how this is evil and how any of the wry 'do-no-evil-lol' quips are deserved.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
  2. Re:"Do no evil" by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, a lot of people disagree with paying for apps as that goes against the purpose and concept of free software

    http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html

    --
    Palm trees and 8