Slashdot Mirror


UK Government Rejects Calls To Upgrade From IE6

pcardno writes "The UK government has responded to a petition encouraging government departments to move away from IE6 that had over 6,000 signatories. Their response seems to be that a fully patched IE6 is perfectly safe as long as firewalls and malware scanning tools are in place, and that mandating an upgrade away from IE6 will be too expensive. The second part is fair enough in this age of austerity (I'd rather have my taxes spent on schools and hospitals than software upgrade testing at the moment), but the whole reaction will be a disappointment to the petitioners." Update: 07/31 11:43 GMT by S : Dan Frydman, the man who launched the petition, has posted a response to the government's decision.

5 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Reading Comprehension? by Manip · · Score: 4, Informative
    Their response was to the suggestion of changing browsers. Their post sets out very clearly that they're migrating their applications and workstations to IE8.

    Complex software will always have vulnerabilities and motivated adversaries will always work to discover and take advantage of them. There is no evidence that upgrading away from the latest fully patched versions of Internet Explorer to other browsers will make users more secure

    And:

    Upgrading these systems to IE8 can be a very large operation,

    Does make one wonder if the submitter or the editor even read it.

    1. Re:Reading Comprehension? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Their post sets out very clearly that they're migrating their applications and workstations to IE8.

      I wonder if you have read it. Here's the complete paragraph from which you quoted one (partial) sentence (emphasis by me; the first emphasized sentence is the one you quoted):

      It is not straightforward for HMG departments to upgrade IE versions on their systems. Upgrading these systems to IE8 can be a very large operation, taking weeks to test and roll out to all users. To test all the web applications currently used by HMG departments can take months at significant potential cost to the taxpayer. It is therefore more cost effective in many cases to continue to use IE6 and rely on other measures, such as firewalls and malware scanning software, to further protect public sector internet users.

      So it's quite clear that they are not upgrading IE versions.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  2. Re:Frosty Pizzo? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Informative

    Opera is far more configurable.
    Firefox plugins leave Opera's configurability in the dust.
    Chrome's interface is cleaner and more compact.
    Only mobile and cli browsers score lower on Acid3.
    Everything else runs circles around IE's rendering times.

  3. Reality: deal with it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is something called reality that has to be dealt with. I know this is typically not what petition signers encounter in their daily lives, but endure this explanation. The truth is that critical applications depend on IE6 to function, and upgrading from IE6 would cause work to stop. They shouldn't have built their apps on IE6? Blame Microsoft, their ruthless tactics led to that situation.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  4. A fully patched IE6? by nacturation · · Score: 5, Informative

    IE8 is the patch to IE6.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.