Slashdot Mirror


WikiLeaks 'a Clear and Present Danger,' Says WaPo

bedmison writes "In an op-ed in the Washington Post titled 'WikiLeaks must be stopped,' Marc A. Thiessen writes that 'WikiLeaks represents a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States,' and that the US has the authority to arrest its spokesman, Julian Assange, even if it has to contravene international law to do so. Thiessen also suggests that the new USCYBERCOM be unleashed to destroy WikiLeaks as an internet presence." Reader praps tips an interview with another WikiLeaks spokesman, Daniel Schmitt, who says they have no regrets about releasing the Afghanistan documents, and says WikiLeaks is "changing the game." Several other readers have pointed out that WikiLeaks posted a mysterious, encrypted "insurance" file on Thursday, which sent the media into a speculative frenzy over what it could possibly contain.

4 of 837 comments (clear)

  1. And they should know by vm146j2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They could only publish it if they were getting the acceptable, authorized leaks which told them so.

    --
    "Lost time is not found again."
  2. Re:too late by Inzite · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is neither about putting the cat back into the bag nor about preventing future leaks. This is about responding by doing something , regardless of whether or not that something that must be done is justified, legal, pragmatic, ethical, or effective.

    Reacting has become the solitary goal of politicians...to take some kind of action when their constituents feel threatened, regardless of whether that action is appropriate, or if there even exists any action whatsoever is appropriate.

    Cases in point:
    The TSA
    The War on Terrorism
    Warrantless Wiretapping
    The War on Drugs
    MADD
    Felony Time for Personal Drug Use
    Religion
    The Pledge of Allegiance
    The Witchhunt to Determine Who Killed Michael Jackson
    Laws Banning Assisted Suicide
    Censorship of (insert media here)
    Laws Against Flag Burning
    The RIAA
    The MPAA
    etc.
    etc.
    etc.

    It's a tragedy of this fully-padded, 100% sterilized, risk-free, instant-gratification, 24/7-connected dreamworld that we are increasingly inhabiting that there has to be an immediate cure for every evil. People no longer accept that sometimes the best action is no action at all.

  3. Re:I Do Not Love It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two of the most recent wiki leaks (Collateral damage and Afghan War diary) are examples of not strategic information but examples of information that shows that the wrong things are done in the wrong places and in the wrong way.

    One of those tells us that the strategic efforts of the USA in the war were wrong in many ways; the other tells us that civilians were killed by a psycho that was imploring to kill civilians.

    I don’t see how this can be of any use to an “enemy” if this is just a report of things your enemy knows but you don't.

  4. Re:I love it by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wikileaks is a small group of people dealing with lots and lots of data. It's not surprising that they screwed up and released papers with personal info in them.

    Well, actually, they didn't released papers with personal info - Only Rupert Murdochs paper The Times/Fox media mouthpieces tried to make that shit stick - however the echo chamber that is the US mainstream media has tried (successfully I might add) to amplify this lame point despite there being not one single shred of evidence to back up the claim. Oh yeah, the one name that they do mention as already dead - died two years ago... but they fail to mention little facts like that, or tell you buried down on page 13.