Slashdot Mirror


The Recovery Disc Rip-Off

nk497 writes "The chances of finding a recovery disc at the bottom of a PC box is getting slimmer, as vendors instead take the cheaper option of installing recovery software on a hard disk partition, leaving the buyer with no physical copy of the operating system they paid for if (or when) the hard disk fails. Users can burn a backup disc, but many aren't as diligent as they should be. While some PC vendors will offer a free or cheap disc at the time of purchase, buying one — or even tracking one down — after the fact can be expensive and take weeks to arrive. 'I've had a lot of people that have had this problem,' said David Smith, director of independent maintenance company Help With Your PC. 'One customer recently found his hard drive had gone, but by the time he'd paid £50 for the recovery disc, paid for a new hard drive and paid for the labour of installing the device, it made more sense to buy a new machine.'"

67 of 551 comments (clear)

  1. It's down to the cost of one disk? by Trip6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's how close we're watching costs these days?

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
    1. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's how close we're watching costs these days?

      In an industry where one is expected to lower your retails costs by 25% every year simply to stay competitive, I can't say I blame them.

      If they could fit enough into the BIOS to have it connect to their servers and redownload your OS in case of drive failure, why the hell not go that route? One less plastic disk the world doesn't need.

    2. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see why they don't do this anyways. And they don't need the BIOS to do it.

      You have your serial number on the sticker on the box. The OEM license discs won't take the non-OEM serial.

      Just publish the ISO image to their FTP site, say "here it is, download/burn it wherever", and be done with it.

      The real answer is that their "built-in burn your own backup" software is a ruse: first they fuck you over not including a real recovery disc separate from the hard drive, then the OEMs (Dell especially) spam ads all over the fucking screen about buying the "upgraded backup software which will back up your personal documents" while you wait for it to burn the fucking DVD at 0.5x speeds.

    3. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>>I can't say I blame them.

      I can. It's cheaper for them to run-off a million or so DVD Restore Discs, with discounted pricing, then for me to run to the store, buy a DVD blank, and record a restore disc. (That's what my new HP Compaq computer expects me to do.) I'd rather pay an extra 10 cents on the purchase price and get the disc.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For anyone not Apple. Look at what happened with Dell. Basically since 2005 they made almost nothing on PC sales. Something like 70% of their operating income came from kick backs from Intel. It's one of the reasons why I don't buy PC's these days. It's been a race to the bottom and to see who can cut the most corners without completely going under.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    5. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by n4f · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the burn even works. I have a Compaq laptop that came preloaded with Windows Vista. Tried burning the recovery because I wanted to wipe the drive, reclaim my 8 gigs by deleting the recovery partition, and install Ubuntu. It would get through 99% of the burn and then just fail randomly. After going through half a dozen DVD-R's, I just gave up.

    6. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Carpathius · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't burn a different image for each machine shipped. Not even each model shipped. I recently had to restore two Dell machines. Each came with a base Windows disk with a bunch of different base drivers for a bunch of different machines. Then came the drivers disk, which supported a bunch of different models as well. Each of those two disks probably supported hundreds of different models.

    7. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's how close we're watching costs these days?

      No - this is part of "encouraging" people to buy a new PC instead of fixing their old PC. Today, I am finding people that are throwing away dual and quad core PCs because the repair costs are so high.

      Microsoft go out of their way to ensure that refurbishers can't just reinstall the original version of Windows. They make it difficult for consumers to reimage their PCs easily.

      If they did that, who would buy a new PC?

    8. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by quantumplacet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having spent more time than I'd care to think about digging through those backup DVDs for drivers, they generally only support one model, occasionally two or three. The reason there are so many drivers on the disc is because a given model usually has dozens of different configuration options, eg 4 or 5 different graphics cards, 3 or 4 different NICs, etc. However, each disc is usually locked to a single model, and does some sort of check that prevents it from running on any other model even if it has all the necessary drivers.

    9. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > And just how the fuck do you expect a presumably novice computer user to just download an ISO image somewhere and burn it? You might as well tell them to use Linux; it would be just about as useless to them.

      If the old OS is any good, it will be made easy for him.

      If the old OS is crap, then he's got extra incentive to dump it.

      There is no good reason why burning an ISO in 2010 should be hard in any OS.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by index0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aol must have been rolling in the money to give free cds away.

    11. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a better idea.. Why make DELL eat the cost. Microsoft can get off their asses and ship dell 22 billion OS install DVD's Those asshats are raking in the money faster.. How about dell having the balls to tell MSFT to shove it and supply install Discs.

      Honestly Michael Dell rolls over for Ballmer every time. Get some ca-hones Mikey! Microsoft will feel it pretty hard if you tell them to go pound sand.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually no. I was going to build my own system for my video editor replacement. But I could not touch the price of buying a prebuilt ASUS PC and the parts to upgrade it.

      for the exact same hardware I could not buy my i7 processor, motherboard, and 8 gig of ram for the price of the same + case+DVD drive+1TB hard drive + Win7 license..

      Either Newegg is price gouging, or the pc makers are really undercutting everyone. Plus I got a Win7 OEM license I was able to sell for $100.00... Oh and ASUS gives you a Microsoft OS install DVD.. and the COA sticker peels off easily because it was too new to set.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The stickler in this is that crapware merchants pay PC vendors to have their stuff shoveled onto machines, so it will be present everywhere unless one installs from true OS media. So shipping true Windows media isn't in the PC company's best interest because it means fewer installs and fewer chances of getting handed cash when someone upgrades or activates the crapware.

    14. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by talz13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it doesn't. If I can buy a 100 pack of DVDRs and burn one for $0.50, they can buy 1 million DVDRs and burn one for $0.05. They've already paid for the license, so why won't they give you a frickin' disc?

    15. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the burn even works. I have a Compaq laptop that came preloaded with Windows Vista. Tried burning the recovery because I wanted to wipe the drive, reclaim my 8 gigs by deleting the recovery partition, and install Ubuntu. It would get through 99% of the burn and then just fail randomly. After going through half a dozen DVD-R's, I just gave up.

      I had this happen with an HP too.

      On a side note, I ended up giving it away. It overheated too much and would freeze or shutdown. I had to use external cooling from an over-sized fan with everything placed next to the window on a cold night. The recipient placed in on two ice packs for setting up Windows.

    16. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In an industry where one is expected to lower your retails costs by 25% every year simply to stay competitive, I can't say I blame them.

      Am I really the only one who would rather they put prices up by 25%, but supplied reliable hardware and a clean OS installation with original media?

      I would be perfectly willing to pay a higher price in exchange for good quality products, where the hardware doesn't fail after only a year or two, the drivers don't get abandoned because a new OS I don't care about came out six months later, the software doesn't routinely crash or leak sensitive data, etc. Unfortunately, hardly anyone in this business seems to make such products any more.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    17. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by TheSambassador · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows actually comes with "ISO Image Burner" integrated into 7. It'd be realllly easy.

      But... even when the manufacturer TELLS people straight up to burn the backup DVD with the provided software, most people just don't do it. I don't see why they'd be more likely to burn an image that they'd have to download it.

    18. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Sabriel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet somehow my local chain store can sell me a DVD movie complete with plastic case and fancy jacket for under ten bucks... and profit from it.

    19. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by mlts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      +1. Even if the cost was 50% more so the PC makers can actually provide the following:

      A decent quality level of components. Caps ready to bust are so 2000-2002.
      A level of phone tech support that is decent (no script readers that hang up on the customer if they can't find where to go on the flowchart).
      Printed manuals. PDF files don't do squat when there is no machine to read them.
      CD-ROM media, as well as read-only USB flash drives so machines without CD-ROM drives can be recovered.

      Ideally, a purchased PC should have:

      Hardware RAID (not hardware-assisted RAID), and two mirrored drives for the boot OS. This way, Joe Sixpack can lose a drive, but still be able to browse his pr0n.
      A decent power supply that is way underused so it can run quietly.
      A drive (or mirrored drives) which are used by a preinstalled backup program for nightly backups. This way, Joe Sixpack can be told to "put recovery disk in the drive, boot, click 'restore', go to the sports bar, and after a few Bud Lights [1], it should be back to where it was before the data loss."

      I sort of miss the days where computer shops were Mom and Pop businesses similar to how bike shops are today. It wasn't perfect, but there was something about having someone to physically come to, should computer problems happen, that made those shops worth patronizing. The closest thing we have these days to this is the Genius Bar at the Apple Store.

      [1]: Using beers as a temporal unit isn't exactly a precise way of doing things, but explaining to someone that setting up backup software and installing an external HDD is a one beer job, versus a reinstall which is a five beer activity gets the point across.

    20. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by sorak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To add a ten-year old gripe to that, why is it that the web browser and the media player are "part of the operating system", but hardware support for CD burning didn't come along until XP, and support for common cd standards, such as ISO format still hasn't become common?

    21. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes, and somehow the dollar store sells re-pressings of older TV movies on DVD for $1 a piece, and profits from it.

    22. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yours too? I've got an HP Pavilion DV6000-series that's nearly as bad. If I don't prop the back end up (the fans point down and to the back, rather than just back--WTF sense does that make???) it overheats and shuts down if I play a flash video in full screen. Hell, sometimes it does anyway. It's a pretty high-end laptop, or was at the time, but gaming is only a possibility in the winter with the thermostat set on 60.

    23. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's about double for a similarly-sounding spec.

      That sounds like either you're being ripped off by your suppliers on the good stuff or you have access to cheaper cheap stuff than here in the UK. Every self-build system I've put together in the past decade had a 25–50% premium over what I could have ordered on-line from a large-scale manufacturer, but I don't think any were any worse than that (and they were all cheaper than what I could have bought off the shelf from the local PC World or similar retail outlets).

      That said, I would happily even pay double the asking price of the typical cheap **** you get today if I could reasonably expect the PC/printer/whatever to last 5+ years rather than 2–3 if I'm lucky, and if came with a clean OS install, working drivers for everything, and with back-ups of all the basic software also supplied on original media. After all, no system I have built myself to a carefully chosen parts specification has ever failed, even after 5+ years of regular use, while the canned machine I'm writing this on was supposedly fairly high-end at the time it was bought yet has been showing warning signs of unreliable hardware since it was less than two years old. Either I've been remarkably lucky over an incredible period of time with the self-build boxes, which is of course still a possibility, or it really is worth buying the better brands of hardware and taking the time to assemble everything carefully.

      However, as I get older and I have other priorities competing for my time, I don't really want to go through the self-build process any more. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any company trying to establish itself as a premium quality PC hardware supplier. Likewise, it seems like no-one really makes everyday software of what I would call acceptable professional quality any more: shipping bug-ridden, hard-to-use junkware and then patching later (or not) has become the norm in the Internet age. Maybe there just aren't enough people like me to make up for all the people who don't know any better and think it's normal for PC power supplies and hard drives to die after a couple of years, printers to stop working because a toner cartridge says you've printed the allowed number of pages with it even though it's still half full, and software to crash and lose your document/spoil your game/whatever at least once before you can finish what you were working on. :-(

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    24. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by Xaositecte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why the hell do people keep thinking this?

      It's not that the cost of a CD is prohibitive or adding anything it the cost.

      It's that someone figured out they can charge more for the CD if they don't include it in the standard price!

    25. Re:It's down to the cost of one disk? by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AOL can spam the entire country with CDs through the snail mail. Companies like Dell have manufacturing processes down to an exact science. It's not that big of a cost. No really, it isn't.

  2. Gotta wonder... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... how many Windows "pirates" actually own a legitimate product key but have simply no install CD/DVD.

    1. Re:Gotta wonder... by richy+freeway · · Score: 2, Informative

      What the hell are you two talking about? Seriously. Both of your statements are wrong.

      OEM Windows WILL activate online, it doesn't always though. Sometimes you do have to ring up, usually if the number has been activated too many times but sometimes just straight off the bat.

      To say that the OEM keys are specific to a particular OEM and that you need the disc from that particular manufacturer is just utter codswallop. I've reinstalled literally hundreds of laptops, all from exactly the same set of ISO's I keep on my server.

  3. HP Does this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife recently bought an HP laptop. It comes with the recovery stuff on a partition.

    You get one time you can burn a physical recovery disk. When we tried it, the process failed. Leaving you with no more tries at a recovery disk, and no recovery disk.

    Very annoying. Combine that with the performance of the laptop, and we won't be buying anything else from HP because they're products are overpriced and crappy. Ripping a CD created MP3 with really bad jitter and noise -- lame for a dual core machine which wasn't doing anything else at the time.

    Posting anonymously because my wife works for HP and we bought it using her discount. :-P

    1. Re:HP Does this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, your an idiot

      I hope you were going for irony there.

    2. Re:HP Does this ... by berashith · · Score: 2, Informative

      The other piece about the HP recovery disks is that they are not an OS disk, but instead an image of the factory default install. I was hoping to have an image with base OS and drivers to get started. Instead I have a copy of all of the apps and other nonsense in the exact same configuration.

    3. Re:HP Does this ... by mlts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I learned that lesson with all PC makers. That is why if I get tasked with helping someone with a new PC, first thing I do is boot it from a Knoppix CD, plug in an external drive, and both tar and dd off the partitions. This gives me an image I know will work. Then I boot a TrueImage or MaxBlast CD and use that to image the partitions. The reason I do both is that for a novice user, TrueImage is easier to use, but I know the Linux dd image is able to put back exactly how something was laid out, sector by sector in case a PC maker decides to an attempt at DRM.

      After that is done, I boot the machine, make the recovery DVDs (preferably onto dual layer DVD+R media), then make ISO images of those.

      It sounds like a lot of work, but it ensures that the machine's software can be put exactly into the state it was when it was opened.

      Of course, after I do all of this, I boot Knoppix again, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda, zeroing out every nook and cranny of the drive, then install the OS of choice from scratch. One of the first and fundamental rules of system administration is never go with what is preinstalled, unless it is a custom OS load just for that box from the factory.

  4. why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows that just need your key that is on the COA so you don't need to torrent the iso?

    1. Re:why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows by shadowrat · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't seem to advertise it, but they do. Digitalreiver hosts it for them:

      http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/10/25/windows-7-64-bit-x64-direct-download-links/

      You require a license to use it, of course, but that is the software.

    3. Re:why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows by Cheviot · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can just order the disk alone from Microsoft at the Microsoft Supplemental Parts center. 800-360-7561

    4. Re:why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows by Locutus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      probably because Microsoft is the one behind this mess. they want you to purchase a new computer with a new copy of Windows or go out and purchase a new licensed CD. They don't want standard Windows installation discs on the market because it is easier to find a product key to use than it is to get a working Windows install CD.

      Remember when you got a copy of the standard installation discs with the PC? You could get the OS installation, not a modified and customized imaging-only type of CD but a full installation disc. Microsoft got the idea that if you had that disc, you would install it on many computers even though it was illegal to do so. Then came the custom installation or imaging CD which only worked on your computer or one exactly like it. Windows activation followed and then the elimination of the CD all together and only a recovery partition which was tied to your boot sector so installing Linux or any other OS or boot manager meant your recovery sector was useless.

      To follow Microsoft's marketing speak, 'Customers have asked for a simpler way to install Microsoft Windows and we believe putting the software on the fastest media, the hard disk, is what's best for the customer.' It's all bull and more talk to best scrap your wallet clean. IMO

      Me, I just download an ISO from ubuntu.com, linuxmint.com, fedoraproject.org, opensuse.org, knoppix.net, etc and move on.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:why can't MS have easy to get iso's for windows by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, which of those links takes me to download a copy of Windows 7 in which I can just put the legal key that came under my laptop?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  5. Not necessarily a rip-off by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, I have never used a recovery CD. When I buy a PC - I do not need or want the recovery CD (It just fills up cabinet space). If this cost is unbundled (and I'm not saying it is) - I'd prefer to pay a little less and not receive the physical media.

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Not necessarily a rip-off by zzsmirkzz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally, I don't want a recovery CD, I want the Windows Install CD and a Driver CD. I just bought an HP which reminded me to make my one set of recovery disks (which I did, 3 DVD's). However, what I really wanted to do was format it and re-install windows to get rid of all the junk they pre-loaded on it.

  6. Infuriating by hcpxvi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is indeed one of the most infuriating things about purchasing a new computer. How much money can it save? Surely the manufacturing cost of an optical disc produced in bulk is in the noise compared to producing and shipping a laptop? Heck, Canonical will ship you a disc with Ubuntu on for free, so it can't be that pricy.

    Actually, perhaps the Linux zealot faction should welcome the "no OS discs" trend. Faced with a machine where you have had to replace the HDD, it is nowadays much easier to obtain and install Linux than to get your hands on the media from which to re-install Windows.

  7. Usage by MistrX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pfff... I never like recovery discs. Every grain of personalisation is gone since the company you bought the computer from placed their wallpapers and custom themes all over the place. Even worse, the harddrive is littered with trials of virusscanners or other advertisement software. Always had that personal drive for your music? It's gone! The last recovery disc I used also 'restored' they drive mapping replacing all partitions to make it factory default again. And there is nothing you can do about it. No settings, no parameters you can set. C drive was wiped like it should, but forget about other partitions and everything on it aswell.

    I HATE recovery discs. Just do it yourself by loading a boot diskette/USB/other external device and install a clean copy of your favorite OS which mostly can be ripped from the recovery disc themselves.

    1. Re:Usage by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I like what dell does with thier buisness machines. The discs they ship (at least the XP ones, I haven't tried the vista or win7 ones) are windows install CDs (not "recovery CDs") that use the normal windows installer, don't insist on wiping the hard drive, don't seem to install andy crapware and yet provided you install them on a dell they will install without any activation BS.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Usage by Domint · · Score: 2, Informative

      This continues to be true for their Vista and Windows 7 recovery media as well. I have stacks of the things here at work, and have even used them to "recover" non-Dell hardware, with a valid license activation key.

  8. Re:Micro$oft by mark72005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's just to save a nickel on each unit.

    My el cheapo Acer laptop was set up this way. The pre-installed software had a utility that creates a recovery disk, which I did almost immediately after buying the machine, then I threw the (2) disks into a safe. Problem was, it never really asked me to do it. I just stumbled on the utility.

    I don't really see anything wrong with the practice personally, but the manufacturers should be much more forceful about telling people to burn recovery disks. There should be some kind of a nag screen when you first start up the machine warning you to burn them and keep them in a safe place.

  9. Re:Ah the joys... by Pop69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    But if you happen to buy a piece of hardware at the store that's not on the distribution's hardware compatibility list, it probably won't include a Linux driver on a disc either.

    You mean that you haven't noticed that Windows has a hardware compatibility list as well ?

  10. Hard disk failure? Unlikely... by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Interesting

    no physical copy of the operating system they paid for if (or when) the hard disk fails

    I know very few people who have recently reinstalled their OS due to hard drive failure. On the other hand, I know quite a few people who have had to reinstall their OS because their OS was a craptastic pile of failure that in one way or another became unusable due to non-hardware issues.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  11. I hate having to be the one to say it... by randomaxe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but every Mac I've ever bought has had install discs for the OS and any additional applications in the box. They are rarely needed, since Time Machine does a fantastic job of providing a backup that I can restore to, but they are there.

    That in itself might be worth the so-called "Apple Tax".

  12. One Of The Best Things About Being A Mac User by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that Apple gives you a real bonafide OS disc with the computer you buy.

    1. Re:One Of The Best Things About Being A Mac User by ducomputergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depends, how much is your time worth? Before I bought my dad an iMac, it was 3 - 4 hours every time I visited cleaning crap off his computer and usually 6 hours around christmas every year to wipe the drive and reinstall. So probably around 15 hours a year. Since I bought him the iMac and he got over the initial how to questions in the first weeks, I've spent a grand total of 2 hours in 3 years upgrading from OS 10.5 to 10.6 on his machine last christmas.

      Not having to deal with that crap when I visit, worth every penny of the apple tax.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    2. Re:One Of The Best Things About Being A Mac User by TRRosen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um I hate to break this to you. But that Snow leopard upgrade disk, is a a full OS install disk. There is no need to install Leopard first.

    3. Re:One Of The Best Things About Being A Mac User by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      A disk that is tied to a particular make model and revision of product is NOT a proper OS disk.

      A proper OS disk is something that you can use on any Apple or Dell of your choosing.

      A Snow Leopard disk is a proper OS package. A Mac recovery disk is not.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. Not only that, but by davebarnes · · Score: 3, Informative

    The discs are not "recovery discs", but full blown copies of the operating system.

    Worth the tax to me.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:Not only that, but by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      > The discs are not "recovery discs", but full blown copies of the operating system.
      >
      > Worth the tax to me.

      No they aren't. They are married to the particular model of Apple they came with. They're no more useful than a Sony recovery disk.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Not only that, but by mlts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget that a retail edition of OS X 10.6 just installs. No CD-keys. No activation. No "genuine advantage". No sudden black screens or notices that the OS may not be genuine. OS X installs, prompts for a username and then to register. OS X Server is a bit tougher, as it asks for a serial number and periodically checks for the same serial on the network, but it doesn't need to repeatedly phone home to keep its "genuine" status.

      Why can't Microsoft operating systems do this? The losses they may get to "piracy" will be completely offset by more people keeping with Windows and not jumping ship because they are tired of the CD key BS.

  14. It's all about the cheddar by gregor-e · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you make a backup, you're also enshrining all the crapware the computer comes with. This guarantees that should the drive fail, your crapware shall not perish, but shall have everlasting life. That's probably worth an extra $10 to the manufacturer, so there's no way they're going to bear the cost of a disc plus lose the extra $10 they can get from the crapware-advertisers.

  15. Well two things by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) You can remove the partition easy enough.

    2) Are you hurting for disk space on a new system? Hell I just bought a laptop a couple months ago and it has 500GB of disk space in it. A *laptop* has that much. Desktops are no problem to get with 1TB or more. Are you really going to miss 10-20GB of that?

    I mean I reinstalled my laptop with Win 7 Pro, instead of the included Home version, but I left the recovery partition. Why not? It isn't a problem or anything.

    1. Re:Well two things by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) You can remove the partition easy enough.

      Yes, you can. Too easily, in fact.

      Sure, if you have Windows (or whatever your favorite OS is) install media then you probably don't care about this recovery partition. It's a good way to get a little extra space on the disk.

      But if you don't have install media and you remove the partition? Now you're screwed.

      I mean I reinstalled my laptop with Win 7 Pro, instead of the included Home version, but I left the recovery partition. Why not? It isn't a problem or anything.

      The problem I have with a recovery partition isn't the space it takes up... It's the fact that it lives on my HDD.

      If I get a nasty virus that starts eating my PC, it can get at that recovery partition. If my HDD fails, that recovery partition is gone. If I upgrade my HDD, I've got no media to use to install Windows on that new disk.

      A recovery partition is entirely too vulnerable. I much prefer a physical disc.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  16. Re:Micro$oft by GaryOlson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wrong assumption on saving money. This could be looked at as a method to drive sales of Windows. Rather than wait for a recovery disk to be shipped, how many people will just drop the system off at BigBoxTechSupport and pay for a clean install -- and how about we upgrade your Microsoft to Windows 7 also? Microsoft sells another license, the retail support department has more sales, and the system owner does not have to know anything about how the system works.

    Just like taking the car to the dealer for service. What could be more natural?

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  17. It gets worse by D.+Book · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently bought an ASUS netbook which not only came with no recovery discs, but no utility to create recovery media (either optical or USB). If the hard disk dies or the recovery partition is corrupted (e.g. by a failed test restore of your self-created drive image), there's no way to restore the system to its factory state yourself. This has been raised in the ASUS forums and their response is sorry, but you have to return the system to them if you need it restored. Remarkably, people who noted this issue in Amazon.com reviews had their criticism thumbed-down, and ridiculed by "most helpful" reviews containing the narrowminded suggestion that recovery media is unecessary because you can "simply restore from the hard disk!".

    1. Re:It gets worse by jpeter20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recommend, not only for netbooks, but for any system, making a backup of the entire hard drive using Clonezilla. I've backed up friends' and family members' hard drives to my external hard drive in case of catastrophe. An added benefit of this method is that you can clean all the crapware off of Windows first, download any system updates, then make your backup, so if and when you need to restore, you have a fresh, fast(er) copy of Windows installed.

  18. Re:Ah the joys... by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it probably won't include a Linux driver on a disc either. Now what?

    Well, there is the internet.

    Actually, though, more often I find the opposite scenario to be true. Most hardware "just works" with Linux, but for Windows you need to install stuff from the included CD. You may be loading just a driver, or you might be installing whatever additional spyware/adware/nagware/crapware the hardware vendor (or some 3rd party) wants on your machine. But as long as it "works", you won't know or care.

    I have nothing (well, a few things maybe) against Windows itself as an OS, but the ecosystem surrounding it is an unmitigated cesspool. The people who swim there see the big chunks of poop floating around, but they think that's just the price you have to pay for a day at the beach (and, of course, you get what you pay for). You'll never convince them to try the clean, cool pond just over the hill, because, well, they'd have to climb that damned hill to get there.

  19. Re:Ah the joys... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

    People that can actually research things.

    I was smart enough that when I wanted a new webcam I used the internet thingy and searched. I found the Microsoft Lifecam HD works under Windows, Linux and OSX perfectly... yet the box says "WINDOWS ONLY!! HOW DARE YOU ASK ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE!!!!"

    I used my brain and made a educated purchase. I guess those that are incapable of doing anything but looking at boxes get to miss out on a lot.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. Re:Download one by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > - I can't make Flash work on Ubuntu, even though I've tried numerous times. It keeps saying something about, "Not enough permission."

    Then you aren't really trying. You aren't actually sincerely trying to make it work. You're just trying to make it fail. You just want something to whine about. You're just a troll.

    It doesn't get any easier than a vendor repository managed package.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  21. Re:Ah the joys... by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've already been told by the other guy but -

    Compared to the latest incarnation of windows (7), linux is dreamlike for hardware compat. That scanner (and any accompanying printers) are more likely to work under linux, and without having to download a hundred megabytes of crap from a support site, if there's any support at all.

    WLAN is a similar story and a friend has just had to go buy another card because he switched to win 7. And 3d is fine now, thanks.

    Look, if you don't like linux for some reason then fine, nobody's forcing you to use it, but your arguments are out of date.

  22. Operating System by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ``vendors instead take the cheaper option of installing recovery software on a hard disk partition, leaving the buyer with no physical copy of the operating system they paid for''

    I don't know if this is still the case, but the last time I took a look at this recovery software, there wasn't any way to install the operating system I paid for, either. This was several years ago, and the recovery software came on a separate CD. However, when run, this would actually overwrite your harddisk with some image which did not match the installation as shipped, nor matched an actual OS install - where you can, for example, use separate partitions for the OS and your data.

    Failing disks are a problem, but these sorts of recovery software add a new and unnecessary problem: if, for whatever reason, you need to recover your OS, they will also wipe out all your data and installed applications. That's not recovery, that's destruction! Of course, I know about partitioning tools that can split partitions while keeping the data, and I back up my data, so I can work around the breakage, but it's still annoying.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  23. Re:How many people actually registers crapware? by mlts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I see, people end up registering the stuff that pops up in order to get it to shut up. The usual antivirus program for example that pops up notices that the end of the world will happen because it will stop getting new definitions in 30 days. If they knew better, they would be pulling that stuff out and installing Microsoft Security Essentials which is provided by MS at no charge, but provides as good AV protection as everyone else.