Slashdot Mirror


The Bus That Rides Above Traffic

An anonymous reader writes "China is the new tech king. They're developing a new, two-lane bus system that travels over traffic below. It's claimed to cost 10% of a subway system and use 30% less energy than current bus technologies." This one has been boggling my brain. I can't see how this is a good idea or safe. But it sure is awesome.

8 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. Trucks? by Danimoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do they have trucks in that area? Wouldn't that pose a minor issue?

    --
    No smoking sigs indoors.
  2. Looks cool, but... by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This looks cool, but I have to wonder how practical it is. First, you'd have to design all your roads and bridges to accommodate it, but second, you'd have issues with things like turning traffic (don't forget to look for a giant bus over your head or coming from behind before you make that turn!) and possibly even pedestrians, although I'm sure they'll have a clever solution like not putting it right next to the sidewalk.

    Just thinking of how things are on my bike sometimes, though, the turning traffic was the first thing that came to my mind.

    --
    R.Mo
  3. Re:Looks nifty assuming no one crashes into the ra by the_fat_kid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best solution would be to let everyone telecommute and invest in laying fiber for greater bandwidth.

    That would be a wonderful solution if nobody MADE any thing.
    you know those nasty, dirty people who produce everything you own.
    I have not been able to find a way to run my cabinet shop from my desk. I'll be damned if I don't have to keep traveling to the shop to cut things and assemble things and those darned customers think that we should deliver and install too.
    please crawl back under your bridge now.

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  4. Re:Looks nifty assuming no one crashes into the ra by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You've got the same problem with streetcars and trolleys. Never seems to slow them down much.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  5. Re:Looks nifty assuming no one crashes into the ra by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    sure, a country should make things and the people who do can commute to work. But that's still would leave a huge chunk of the population who could work from anywhere. we're wasting time and fuel being on the roads, only 5% of days at most would I physically need to be present at work or at client.

  6. The best of both worlds by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The advantages of el trains and monorail systems is that they don't compete with street traffic. The advantage of buses is that they can pass each other -- one stalled car doesn't take the whole line down as currently happens with light rail. Elevated bus lanes seems to me the best of both worlds.

    Regarding earthquakes, elevated roadways are a mature technology. Nothing is 100% safe -- if you're looking for absolute safety we'd never build anything -- but built to today's standards, elevated roadways shouldn't be any less safe than any of the other tall structures hanging over you -- overpasses, skyscrapers, bridges, etc.

    Parenthetically, light rail on the street is the worst of both worlds. The disadvantages of light rail (the system moves as a whole or not at all) with the disadvantages of buses (the system competes with street traffic). When I was living in San Jose, cars being t-boned by light rail in low speed collisions was so common that people started scrawling under the ubiquitous "Taking 217 cars off the road" the addition "One car at a time".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  7. Re:Looks nifty assuming no one crashes into the ra by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Americans are good drivers compared with a lot of the world. Not the best certainly (Germans are indeed far better), but good. Much more of the world is like Italy than Germany, or at least the bits I've seen or heard of. I've personally observed a fair chunk of Europe and the Middle East; and while northern Europeans are generally as good or better drivers than Americans, most of southern Europe is kind a scary. The Middle East is freaking frightening, and I say that as someone who did most of his driving there in an armored vehicle. Asia in general doesn't look any better in the footage I've seen, though there are definite exceptions (Japan comes to mind immediately). From first hand accounts of friends, Africa is one giant game of bumper cars in most countries.

    If you listed every country on Earth in order of driving safety, I'd be willing to bet the US would be in the top 15 or 20 percent. And yes, that does scare the Hell out of me now that I think of it.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  8. Re:Looks nifty assuming no one crashes into the ra by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maye you got modded down because of your selective quoting. The parent to your post was talking about streetcars and trolleys, not the DC Metro system, which is trains on dedicated tracks.

    And also maybe because you used your tangential complaint to segue into your personal desire to use a car, based on fallacies in your post, which no one really gives a flying fuck about.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai