Slashdot Mirror


Hands On With the BlackBerry Torch 9800

adeelarshad82 writes "Research in Motion announced the company's first slider-style BlackBerry, the Torch 9800, which is also the first BlackBerry with both a touch screen and hard keyboard, and the first device to run the new OS 6. The Torch feels and looks very much like a BlackBerry, with the proper BlackBerry Bold-style arrangements of plastic, metal, and glass; there are also BlackBerry fonts on the keys and the now-standard BlackBerry trackpad. The Torch's 3.2-inch, 360-by-480 screen is a standard capacitive LCD touch screen. The screen is bright and sharp, but it's obviously behind the competition in terms of resolution. The Torch has a 5-megapixel camera with VGA video recording, Bluetooth 2.1, 512 MB of program memory, 4 GB of built-in storage, and 802.11n Wi-Fi. The Torch has the same 624-MHz Marvell processor as the existing BlackBerry Bold. The new BlackBerry 6 OS adds touch to the interface mix. RIM appears to have totally rewritten its media apps. There's a new Desktop Manager coming with BlackBerry 6, and a Social Feeds app that combines Twitter, Facebook, and various instant messaging conversations."

24 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Bad Apple by Spazntwich · · Score: 5, Funny

    How you like RIM, Jobs?

    1. Re:Bad Apple by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I once had a recruiter contact me about a position at Research in Motion. For the next 2-3 days as we corresponded back and forth, I kept receiving emails titled "re: Rim Job" "re: re: Rim Job" "re: re: re: Rim Job".

      I suppose I'm lucky they weren't all immediately filtered as spam.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Bad Apple by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A job at Research in Motion.

    3. Re:Bad Apple by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best part? Their careers site is rim.jobs.

  2. According to Slashdot by mark72005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to Slashdot, this phone already outsold the iPhone in the last quarter :)

  3. Re:Groundbreaking [2007]! by qoncept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They think they know better than people who have used both.

    --
    Whale
  4. Blech by grub · · Score: 2, Interesting


    RIM is like Microsoft: not the best made stuff, but business adopted it so it's a standard of sorts.

    I hate that my workplace will buy us Blackberries but won't go iPhone (or whatever). I end up swapping the SIM to my personal iPhone and all is well but it's still wear and tear on my own stuff.

    .

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Blech by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where I work they recently started allowing employees to bring their own 3Gs/4 iPhones to the network with the caveat there would be no support whatsoever to those people. In the the few months that policy has been in place there have been numerous company wide mobile email outages to those iPhones. Of course many executives switched and you can't NOT support the execs. AT&T couldn't figure out what the problem was and neither could Apple. In the 4 years I've been here I can count on one hand the number of times the email on the Blackberries has gone down. I've been discouraging people from getting iPhones for work and now I can actually offer them an alternative. I welcome the Torch with open arms.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Blech by rabbit994 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We have had opposite experience. We do provide work iPhones and support them. iPhone users we never hear from again about Email. Blackberries on other hand are constantly loosing connection to BES, BES looses connection to mailbox, reset their BES account, clean out their Blackberry queue, it's never ending ticket queue.

      Between most sysadmins I know, their dislike of BES is pretty universal and we wish they would embrace ActiveSync like everyone else.

    3. Re:Blech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blackberries on other hand are constantly loosing connection to BES, BES looses connection to mailbox

      Why don't you tighten up your connection then?

  5. WebKit by IceFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Surprised it isn't in the summary, but this phone is also the first Blackberry to have a WebKit based browser which is big news.

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    1. Re:WebKit by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

      No kidding. Have you ever tried developing for the BlackBerry browser, or the Widget API, which uses the same rendering engine? Netscape 4 is literally more capable and standards-compliant by comparison. It's virtually unusable to do anything beyond bare basics with JavaScript or CSS (and even then, behavior is often inconsistent and unreliable).

      The Widget API is also perplexing in its own right. Although it supposedly uses the same rendering engine, its implementation of the DOM is slightly different from the Browser's. In short: a nightmare.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:WebKit by pspahn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that is what distinguishes a Blackberry as a business phone. Only a large business with many wasted resources would want to develop for a Blackberry.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  6. Re:Groundbreaking [2007]! by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get this artificial distinction between "business" users and "non business" users.

    Business user: I need fast push access to e-mail and critical documents wherever I go. I don't care about anything else.

    Personal user: LOL i just want 2 play sum farmville and take sum pictures of my doggie and put it on fabo and omg twitter i liek dont care if it works all the time k just as long as its pretty pretty!!!!1111ONE00110001

  7. Re:AT&T - No Thanks by cygnwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. I happen to... mostly... Like my provider. Even though they don't always have the uber popular phones like the i-phone. And they completely seem to miss the point about 'rugged' phones (Nothing since the Moto W450? Really?). But I like the customer service I've gotten, I like my plan, I like my coverage... I just don't like the fact that the phone manufactures are trying to force me to pay full price for the phones I want (instead of changing to their exclusive service vendor, if you can call what AT&T and Verizon do 'service') and then go through the process of jailbreaking them to use them on the network that I like. Makes me feel like a second class citizen...

    --
    Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
  8. Look and feel by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Torch feels and looks very much like a BlackBerry

    Wait. Is that supposed to be a compliment? The only nice things to say about Blackberry relate to their keyboards and enterprise software.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  9. Re:Meh by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Internals are a bit disappointing. Why are they only putting a 624Mhz processor in their new flagship device? HTC, Apple, Moto & Samsung are all using 1ghz ARM variants in their flagship phones--with higher speeds and dual core phones on the near horizon.

  10. Re:Meh by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meh for the average user, true. Nice to see RiM focusing back on business users without trying to introduce an "iPhone killer".

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  11. Renamed for the UK market... by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Funny

    The phone will be dubbed the "Blackberry Flashlight 9800" for UK owners

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:Renamed for the UK market... by natehoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's just hope they don't have any battery overheating problems, or the "Torch" name will turn into a bad pun really, REALLY fast.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  12. Re:Meh by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meh for the average user, true. Nice to see RiM focusing back on business users without trying to introduce an "iPhone killer".

    And how are they focusing on businesses moreso than they already do? It looks like they're missing the forest for the trees by rushing to include every new buzzword-laden technology (Social Feeds! Instant messaging! Facebook!) without actually understanding the underlying themes and trends. To me, that seems like the antithesis of "focusing on business users."

    Also, why is it that businesses cannot benefit from the (considerably superior) graphical, processing, and multitouch capabilities of the current crop of Android and iOS devices?

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  13. Re:Groundbreaking [2007]! by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any reasons people would pick an Iphone over the current crop of Android devices or Blackberries?

    Any reasons people would pick an Android device over the current crop of Iphones or Blackberries?

    (You forgot Symbian btw - the number one platform, and as of Q2 2010 still increasing their lead over Blackberry and Apple, with their increase in sales second only to Android.)

    And on a related note, I'm pleased that we manage to get coverage of the Blackberry without an obligatory astroturfing comparison to "the Iphone" as if it were number one, neither in the article nor the summary. Unfortunately the BBC are on their usual Apple spinning form, with the headline "RIM launches Blackberry Torch to challenge iPhone". (Does any other kind of product get a reference to a less successful competitor when it's covered in the news? And why pick Apple rather than Android (who are growing faster) or Nokia (who are number one)?)

  14. As an indie BB developer... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an indie BB developer, I've mixed impressions here. The changes to OS6 look very promising (I'll be digging in more tonight since they released the SDK today, but so far they look good -- and this on top of a platform that was pretty solid to begin with, even if not the flashiest out there.) There are also some cool features - like gesture support on the trackpad, integrated search, etc - which I'm looking forward to playing with.

    A lot of things I've had to manually code workarounds for are now part of the OS. This is a two-edged sword though: I still need to support older platforms (thus must keep my legacy code); yet also want to have the more efficient/integrated advantage that comes with using native APIs. It's not *too* painful as I've already determined handling for this scenario in previous OS versions (5.0, 4.7, 4.6, 4.5, 4.3...) ... but it is frustrating as some of these things really should have been there all along. (On the other hand: this isn't a problem specific to BB. -- it's a problem with developing against any platform that undergoes significant improvements over time.)

    I was looking forward to the Torch hardware itself - since my first BB (8700c) I was thinking it would be really cool if they found a way to merge their keyboard with the Palm touchscreens. When I heard about it, I had geekgasms. Now that I'm seeing the specs... my reaction is mixed. I'm seeing a lot of feedback about the relatively slow processor (compared to other smartphones); but realistically I don't anticipate that to have much effect. My experience with BB has shown that Well written apps will run well; poorly written apps will run poorly; but the core OS will remain snappy. As long as that doesn't change, I'm not too concerned about the CPU speed. (the only exception was the 8800 - that thing was dog-slow... don't know what they were thinking.) Even the RAM doesn't bother me - though I am still h oping we'll see the ability to run apps off of SD card or at least on-board flash. Either of these would make RAM an absolute non-issue.

    What disappoints me is the screen resolution: this device has the same resolution as my 9700-- which has a much smaller screen. I really expected this to get bumped up a notch in this release, and the fact that it hasn't has me debating whether i want to get the Torch, or wait for the Flaming Torch or whatever the next version of the hardware will be. Considering how long I've been wanting exactly this device, the idea of waiting for a next rev is irksome.

    Overall: the OS looks good. The API improvements make a solid system even better. The new tools for web-based apps look very promising, and a vast improvement over their previous iteration. The hardware is "meh", but still a step up; I only wish the screen were better resolution. The fact that they're now including app store with the OS itself is also a huge improvement: too many people think that the crapware links that AT&T/whoever pushes to the phone are the extent of the BB app selection, and that's not the case. Hopefully this push (along with their planned marketing) will make both developers and consumers more aware that BB is a good platform for apps.

  15. Re:Meh by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Internals are a bit disappointing. Why are they only putting a 624Mhz processor in their new flagship device? HTC, Apple, Moto & Samsung are all using 1ghz ARM variants in their flagship phones--with higher speeds and dual core phones on the near horizon.

    Get this... if you don`t spend all your processing time making animated zooming window borders and other GUI frills, you don`t NEED an insane processor. What does a cell phone need to do?

    Make calls... doesn`t need much processing power.
    Look up contacts. Make appointments. Access memos... doesn`t need much processing power.
    Take pictures. Display low-res video. Encode and decode music... doesn`t need much processing power.

    If your phone seems slow, it`s because it`s full of glitzy crap. My Bold 9700 does everything I ask it to do, immediately. It doesn`t lag. It isn`t slow. It doesn`t - in a nutshell - need a faster processor.

    --
    "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."